blaxon

And FYI, be sure to duly note this and inform and share with your fellow misguided desperation committee.

"out of control": Says you, and the democrats, but they mean ICE is out of their control. SO, at the end of the day review the attached photo and basic simple tailored for the basic thinkers message contained within and try to keep with reality and not your own misguided emotional state. You reak of emotional bias so very typical of brainwashed democrats, the pic of a sandwich pretty much lays out the basis for your childish desperation. But your behavior is endemic across the blue libtard spectrum, so you be you and let us laff @ U.

Courts have ruled that its reasonable to shoot as often as required to contain the threat and its not required to justify each and every shot fired.

Brief and on point. Study this. Questions?

Don't need one, (defense) has a badge and a requirement to carry out federal law enforcement of the laws enacted by congress. The problem stems from a domestic terrorist weaponizing their vehicle and threatening a federal officer engaged in lawful and prescribed law enforcement. Poor judgement cost a terrorist her life and thats on the dead poet and the democrats who did noting but the fan the flames for the wokesters at ICE Watch. Maybe this is why Gov Walt passed this into law.

Even better, a highly trained, skilled and experienced professional. There won't be a prosecution of ICE agent Ross, but if the fraudsters in MN think they can, the case is dead, much like Ms. Good. So, try to understand the attached photo, specifically item 3.

Just like Michael Byrd did when he murdered Ashley Babbitt in cold blood.How's your double standard levels today! Time to take a closer look, think it thru and believe whats right and not what you feel emotionally, that's what your problem is but you already know that.

I've heard she was a poet, an award winning one (the Academy of American Poets Prize (specifically the university/college-level award at Old Dominion University) AND an esteemed and trained member of Ice Watch group (specifically a Minneapolis/Minnesota chapter). Reports from outlets like the New York Post, National Review, The Post Millennial, Fox News, and others describe her as an active participant in ICE Watch, a network of activists who monitor, alert communities to, and interfere with ICE operations (often described as "rapid response" or "legal observers"). Locals and vigil attendees called her a "warrior" who received thorough training on how to respond to ICE agents—knowing rights, whistling alerts, documenting actions, resisting commands, and sometimes more confrontational tactics like blocking vehicles or "de-arresting." https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/08/minnesota-ice-shooting-nicole-macklin-good https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2026/01/12/the-left-doesnt-want-you-to-know-this-about-renee-goods-ice-watch-training-n4948195 https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/blog/can-renee-good-family-sue-ice-shooting/ Poetry and now Darwin Award?

It's possible Maduro may want to share his knowledge about dominion, smartmatic and how they work with election fraud bringing some clarity to any shenanigans in the 2020 election. I'm certain he's looking to deal something to avoid dying in a super max such as Florence.

If Trump is a pedophile like Bill Clinton, where is the evidence of this? If there's evidence in the Clinton-Epstein files why didn't Bidens den of pedophiles expose it and finish Trump off for good? It's no different with all the evidence the "made for production" Jan 6 committee deleted INSTEAD of dumping it on Spec counsel Jack Smiths lap to further take down President Trump. Democrats if not always lying maybe are just too daft to get it sorted, that is to keep the lies from unraveling.

Maybe Trump was looking to collect the increased bounty Biden placed on Maduro for information leading to Maduro's arrest and/or conviction on charges including narco-terrorism, cocaine importation conspiracy, and related weapons offenses tied to his alleged leadership of the "Cartel de los Soles." On January 10, 2025 (shortly before Biden left office and coinciding with Maduro's controversial swearing-in for a third term amid disputed election results), the Biden administration's State Department announced an increase to up to $25 million for Maduro. They also raised the reward for Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello to $25 million (from $10 million) and added a new $15 million reward for Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino López. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/10/world/americas/biden-bounty-nicolas-maduro.html

They should investigate the BILLIONS stolen by Somali's in the largest welfare fraud in US history. And investigate why they allowed MPLS to burn during the George Floyd glory day riots.

Zero evidence of that as you should know and the ICE agents position being in front of a car does done exonerate the domestic terrorist for committing felonious assault by weaponizing her vehicle and in this case striking the ICE agent.

Where is the evidence of that, or are you making up something only you know about? And, BTW, the agents perceived state of anger, or as some would say "evil intent" are irrelevant and has precedent case law in support of that, so go look it up and maybe learn something. Start here: Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989).

The problem began (not to mention refusing to comply to numerous orders to exit the vehicle) as she pointed the wheels hard to the left and reversed the vehicle maybe 1 meter PLACING the ICE agent directly in the path of the vehicle now as he was off to the side while filming. That's the moment the domestic terrorist crossed to felonious assault status as she then accelerated immediately towards the ICE agent weaponizing her vehicle to deadly weapon status and based on her very bad judgement she was justifiably neutralized after being shot dead by the ICE agent whom had every reason to fear for his safety and those in immediate vicinity and elsewhere as the terrorist tried to strike the ICE agent and then take flight. The point is that Renee Good committed an aggravated felony against the ICE Officer before he drew his weapon and fired his first shot. IT DOES NOT MATTER WHETHER SHE ACTUALLY STRUCK HIM WITH HER VEHICLE. As the jury instruction states in (United States v. Wallace) the assault is complete “if the defendant’s conduct places the officer in fear for his life or safety…” case law link: https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/united-states-v-wallace-889832742 That means that when the ICE Officer fired his weapon, he was attempting to “seize” a fleeing felon. All uses of force — lethal and non-lethal — to immobilize a suspected criminal offender are “seizures.” The Fourth Amendment requires that seizures be “reasonable” in order to comply with the Fourth Amendment. The girlfriend or wife of the terrorist will likely face charges for her role if she's found to be in violation of any of the following federal statutes. Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371): This covers agreements to commit a crime against the U.S., like obstructing a federal operation. If they conspired to interfere with the arrest or provoke a reaction, this could stick, with penalties up to 5 years in prison. Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1505): Interfering with federal law enforcement duties, such as an immigration enforcement action. Her role in filming and allegedly directing Renee to the scene could be seen as aiding the obstruction, carrying up to 5 years. Aiding and Abetting Assault on a Federal Officer (18 U.S.C. § 111 and § 2): If Renee's acceleration of the SUV toward the agent is deemed assault with a deadly weapon (the vehicle), and Rebecca encouraged or facilitated it, she could be liable as an accomplice. This is a felony with up to 20 years if serious injury occurred (the agent was reportedly dragged and injured).

Absolutely was not over reaction. She was armed with a 4,000 lb deadly weapon. The threat to the officer, his fellow officers, the general public and anyone and anything else potentially targeted by this domestic terrorist wielding her car as a deadly weapon. There's legal ruling, the precedent which provides a framework for defending such actions, and the totality-of-circumstances analysis, focusing on the officer's perspective in split-second decisions by the ICE agent. Until the terrorists vehicle quits moving, the threat posed still exists. Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U.S. 765 (2014) https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/572/765/

Call it what you will, democrat rhetoric inflaming the situation. The ICE agent took appropriate action in response to a life threatening attack by a trained domestic terrorist who weaponized her vehicle and used it as a deadly weapon and neutralized the threat as all LE are trained to do in situations like this where their safety and the public's as well is under deadly assault. Maybe be these trained domestic terrorists will give extra thought now before trying to run over police with their vehicle.

in support of ICE.

Maybe there will be more streets in Iran renamed to Trump who could now be on course trajectory to hero status with the Iranian people. I have no doubt Trump can make good things happen for the Iranian people. https://x.com/nypost/status/2008979491821879304?s=20 Trump street Tehran.mp4

The girlfriend, barking out commands during their encounter and obstruction of ICE performing lawful congress enacted laws may face prosecution! If evidence supports that she encouraged, planned, or participated in the interference with the ICE arrest—such as urging Renee to confront the agents while filming with intent to escalate for publicity—the following federal offenses could apply, given ICE's involvement: Conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371): This covers agreements to commit a crime against the U.S., like obstructing a federal operation. If they conspired to interfere with the arrest or provoke a reaction, this could stick, with penalties up to 5 years in prison. Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1505): Interfering with federal law enforcement duties, such as an immigration enforcement action. Her role in filming and allegedly directing Renee to the scene could be seen as aiding the obstruction, carrying up to 5 years. Aiding and Abetting Assault on a Federal Officer (18 U.S.C. § 111 and § 2): If Renee's acceleration of the SUV toward the agent is deemed assault with a deadly weapon (the vehicle), and Rebecca encouraged or facilitated it, she could be liable as an accomplice. This is a felony with up to 20 years if serious injury occurred (the agent was reportedly dragged and injured). Other Possibilities: In Minnesota (state level), charges like reckless endangerment or conspiracy to commit endangerment could arise if local prosecutors get involved, especially since her statements like "I made her come down here, it's my fault" suggest involvement. Past allegations of domestic abuse (e.g., cigarette burns on children) aren't directly related but could influence bail or sentencing if charged here. Renne's g:f.mp4

She's a trained agitator, an ICE Watch’ ‘warrior’ who trained to resist feds before shooting". Sadly, her misguided proclivities and overt criminal actions ended her life. She should have obeyed the laws and the ICE agents requests, not weaponized her vehicle and she would have spent the evening at home with her 2 or 3 children instead of horizontally laid out on a slab in the HCMC morgue facility. https://nypost.com/2026/01/08/us-news/renee-nicole-good-was-minneapolis-ice-watch-warrior-who-trained-to-resist-feds-before-shooting/

And, if more domestic terrorists like Renee Good attempt to weaponize their vehicles against federal (or any) LE agents, they will dealt with accordingly, proportionately in accordance with laws not the least of which was enacted by MN governor Walz himself. Minnesota Statute §609.066, signed by Gov. Tim Walz in July 2020, which permits officers to deploy deadly force against a vehicle accelerating toward them as an imminent threat, without requiring physical impact. https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/609.066

BCA, hennepin county sheriffs office (HCSO), other state agencies ALL lack jurisdiction in federal cases as ICE are federal employees, period. In addition, Minnesota being run by fraudsters (refer to MASSIVE current/ongoing somali welfare fraud) and their refusal to cooperate with ICE /immigration has precluded them from the investigation for good reason. They cannot be trusted, obviously. The federal government’s decision to exclude Minnesota from the ICE shooting investigation is a direct consequence of the state’s deliberate obstruction of immigration enforcement. Minnesota Statute § 171.12 and Minneapolis Code Chapter 19.30(a)(3) actively restrict information sharing with ICE, violating 8 U.S.C. § 1373. The Laken Riley Act mandates cooperation, yet Minnesota’s sanctuary policies—like Hennepin County’s refusal to honor detainers—prioritize political posturing over public safety. When a state repeatedly undermines federal authority, its participation in sensitive investigations becomes a conflict of interest. This isn’t about transparency—it’s about ensuring accountability isn’t sabotaged by entities that have already shown contempt for the rule of law. The DOJ’s lawsuit (U.S. v. Minnesota, 0:25-cv-03798) proves systemic noncompliance. Trust is earned, not demanded. https://x.com/DOGEai_tx/status/2009319577730023521?s=20

The guy who disarmed one of the shooters IS NOT muslim. He is a Lebanese Maronite Christian (an Eastern Catholic Christian denomination)

Don't forget the Trump Russia probe was a lost plot orchestrated by democrat lost plot experts.