JonnyF

History will show his start was way better than his finish. 

Just now, Old Farang said:

Someone is on its last legs, and it is Iran, not Israel, 2 more days of Israel/US action will put the problem to rest.

Indeed.

Not only Iran, but Palestine as well.

Neither are in much of a position to demand anything. 

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Is that you attempting to attribute behavior I had no part in to me, or perhaps some defense of collective punishment?

You said you like singing their "unique chant". That chant is pretty unique in modern football. Perhaps you should be more specific if you don't wish to be misunderstood?

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

I don’t have an ‘alleged stance’ I post my views for which I am responsible, I’m not responsible for views I have not expressed.

You alledgedly support gay/trans rights. You have proudly made that claim many times. Yet a few days ago you were waxing lyrical about Saudi Arabia and now you're talking about enjoying 'unique' Spurs chants. Makes me wonder is all...

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

I’m sure you can work that out.

Yes, it seems I have...

1 hour ago, RuamRudy said:

 

I think you are confusing Britain with Lalaland, a place you seem to be spending an increasing amount of time in. 

For such a proud nationalist you seem to have some strange opinions on controlling borders.

Then again, not many of them want to go to Scotland so you can talk the talk without having to walk the walk. A classic Scottish trait.  

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

That didn’t used to be the case, when exactly did it start being a thing?

It was a gradual slide into such a pathetic state of affairs.

But you already knew that.

No surprise from someone who organizes an event where people dress as the opposite sex and expose themselves to children. 

8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m perfectly aware of the history of the Spurs and their connection to London’s Jewish community and have often enjoyed joining other Spurs fans in encouraging the players with our unique fans chant.

A tad hypocritical given your alleged stance in this thread...

https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/ckgzl1q5y19o

3 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I do cheer my team, but I don’t turn a blind eye to their failures.

Seems you turn a blind eye to their actual results though. I'm sure you're a huge fan though... 😃

15 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m a Spurs fan, which is quite enough of a burden thank you.

If true, I suggest you keep quiet about your anti-Israeli stance if you ever attend a game. Keep your Palestinian flag at home. 

Spurs have a long standing association with the Jewish community. 

39 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

So if trans people don’t exist why do you lay in bed feverishly thinking about them?

Is this really your best argument against the point that he was making?

Essentially...  "You're gay".

Is that the best you've got Chomps? 😃

6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Once again demonstrating the rightwing fixation with transgender women while ignoring transgender men.

 

Its a thing.

Probably because it's the blokes doing most of the raping. 

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

Well I would agree few blokes on this forum make more noise about transgender people than you Jonny.

You being one of them (allegedly 😉).

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

I say live and let live , don’t you agree?

Absolutely. I have no problem with blokes wearing dresses if that's what does it for them. As long as they stay out of women's sport, women's toilets/changing rooms and women's prisons then they can wear a pink girraffe costume for all I care.

I will continue to refuse to pretend they are women though. 

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

And who gets to determine if their views are expressed correctly?

I said they should be presented correctly. i.e. as a bloke who likes to dress up as a woman.

Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

 

Maybe the rightwing should restrict their time ranting about transgender people to your suggested 1%, you keep the matter in proportion. 

If they occupied less than 1% of airtime, the commenting on them would reduce to a similar level.

30 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Trans people exist, they have views, allowing them to express their views is not political, it’s simply not denying them the rights others enjoy.

As long as their views are presented correctly I have no issue.

For example, "Now let's hear from Dave, the man from Cardiff who likes to dress like a woman and thinks women can have a penis and that men can give birth".

The frequency of their views being aired should also be proportional to their representation in society i.e. less than 1% of air time should be spent on them.

1 minute ago, spidermike007 said:

Whenever somebody levels any criticism at Trump you always go back to your fallback position and call them obsessed, have you ever thought that maybe you are the one who is obsessed with defending the circus clown? 

I feel no need to defend Trump against an incident that is completely unrelated to him. 

Just now, CallumWK said:

 

Probably the same as why you always blame the woke lefties for everything you don't agree with

Only when it is related to Woke leftism. 

6 hours ago, webfact said:

This case contrasts with a British man's experience in Phuket, where a dine-and-dash attempt resulted in an altercation with local performers. The differing outcomes have sparked debate on law enforcement practices.

A 2 tier justice system that actually favours nationals over foreigners?

Kind of like the opposite of the UK then. 

The Brit must be upset. Treated as a second class citizen in Britain and also when he goes abroad. 

8 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Maybe my question should be, how do you define "the law" here in the Land of Smiles the Cake Box?

 

Broadly speaking, I would define it as a system of rules, established by government and enforced through social institutions.

May I recommend a beginners course on Jurisprudence. They are quite inexpensive now. As is googling the meaning of Jurisprudence. 

2 minutes ago, Tug said:

Why are you obsessed with another country’s problems?

I have an interest in global politics and international news/affairs.

Perhaps if you took a similar interest it would help with your Trump obsession? 

Just now, NanLaew said:

How do you define what is "illegal" in Thailand, the Land of Smiles the Bung?

The law would be a good place to start. 

More competitively priced exports for the US.

Fewer imports. More people buying locally. 

Great news.

5 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

This guy isn't military. Never has been, either.

Never said he was. 

5 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

 

Now when the military say's it ain't gonna happen, then all bets are off.

Betting is illegal in Thailand. Therefore the bets are already off.