Jump to content

DNPBC0

Member
  • Posts

    328
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DNPBC0

  1. The irony is that the Thailand Tobacco Monopoly is government owned and a good earner.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thailand_Tobacco_Monopoly

    ...and probably a 'good earner' for government officials. The Wikipedia article refers to US Court documents which in 2010 showed that three tobacco companies had paid US$1,238,750 in bribes to officials of the Thailand Tobacco Monopoly to secure sale prices:

    http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/August/10-crm-903.html

  2. Unless these Cambodians were an imminent theat to the lives of Thai soldiers or civilians, this appears to be clear case of extrajudicial killing and as such needs to be thoroughly investigated by the Thai authorities. Of course, the USA's model of blowing people to bits with drone rockets in Pakistan, Somalia and the Yemen on the pure suspicion that they are terrorists sets everybody sliding down this slippery slope.

    • Like 2
  3. The Nation article fails to mention that 100% of people will die. The question implied by the article then becomes how can we toss in the towel for the least cost. The answer is, of course, die as soon as possible, thereby avoiding the medical and related costs which would have accumulated over the years of a longer life. Die young, folks - it saves money.

  4. .................................

    Australia is a rice producer and exporter of medium grain rice, the size of the crop limited by water availability. Around 1 million tonnes/year is grown with the highest yield/hectare (around 10, Thailand 3.3) and lowest water usage in the world, and of course FAR fewer people employed so much higher incomes.

    Can you imagine the look on Yingluk's face if it was suggested we could teach Thais how to grow rice.

    I suspect the same lack of efficiency operates for all Thailand's agricultural products. Yet, here we are surrounded by areas of increasing food deficits with a huge market potential if only Thailand could pull it's finger out and improve its productivity and agricultural systems.

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2012/05/daily-chart-17?fsrc=nlw

    20120602_woc302.png

  5. Great news from the PM of Thailand. It shows some vision for the future at a time when global food security is increasingly threatened by population growth, water shortages, energy uncertainties and climate change. Thailand is in a good position to make a positive response, but farmers here are very badly remunerated, poorly resourced in terms of modern technology and seriously undervalued as keystones of the nation. I am hoping that Yingluk will lead a revitalisation of Thai agriculture and the status of farmers.

  6. The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money.

    The problem with capitalism is that it allows investment bankers to turn other people's money into global financial crises.

    No, that's corporatism.

    By far very different things, since both socialism and corporatism counts on the governments intrusion into the market place.

    No. it's capitalism - a particularly rampant form of it. It was precisely the lack of government regulatory control of the financial market which allowed the investment banking system to create worldwide economic havoc.

  7. Minor earthquakes frequently precede major ones and to talk of the recent handful of small quakes being a good sign because they relieve tectonic pressure borders on the bizarre. The earthquake magnitude scale is logarithmic. This means, for example, that to release the energy of a magnitude 6 earthquake there would need to be 1000 magnitude 4 or 32,000 magnitude 3 smaller earthquakes.

    The painful ignorance of the Director of the National Disaster Warning Centre comes as no surprise, but his failure to have his stupid statements checked by one of his team of scientists tells us that he is also dangerously arrogant.

  8. He said the city administration has a direct responsibility to speed up the drainage of floodwater in the capital.

    The central government did not interfere with flood control under the city jurisdiction, he said.

    What was the Disaster Act enabled for? Did it get withdrawn?

    There does seem to be considerable confusion about the Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Act 2007. To refresh everyone's memories, an English translation of the Act is here:

    http://thailaws.com/law/t_laws/tlaw0397.pdf

    Of course, as is usually the case in Thailand, there are two jokers in the pack: (1) how accurate the English translation is, and (2) how far the provisions of the Act can be ignored or bent by Thais.

    If the translation is accurate, then my understanding is that under s.15 the BMA Governor has the responsibility for disaster prevention and mitigation in his own area until, and unless, he is over-ruled by the Commander in Chief (the PM says she is that?) under s.13.

  9. This should have been done two weeks ago at least.

    But let's see what actually get's done to prepare for this disaster .... besides a press conference.

    So far almost everything is a reaction .... haven't seen much significant preparation ... except the sandbag walls ... which only delay the floods.

    The delay;s that the sandbags are providing should be used for evacuations and preparations.

    I agree, especially since there is no special procedure for 'invoking' the Act or declaring a 'disaster'.

    A full copy of the Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Act 2007 (English versions) is available here:

    http://thailaws.com/...ws/tlaw0397.pdf

    It is interesting to see that under the Act all provincial governors (including the BMA Governor) were expected to have prepared disaster plans by the end of 2009. I wonder where these are, or even if they were done. If not, then the governors should be held accountable for some of the chaos. Of course, TIT :(.

  10. Unsubstantiated assertions aside, I guess that no-one will really know how many were killed as a consequence of Thaksin's 'war on drugs' or how many innocent people died at the hands of the police. That's the problem. Unless the police and the criminal justice system abide by due process and unless homicide investigations are instigated, conducted, completed and reported according to established protocols, we are left floundering in doubt, debate and distrust, and the door is wide-open to those who believe that 'collateral damage' and extrajudicial killings are fine and dandy.

    It's probably time to re-read the 2003 Amnesty International report, which clearly documents the lack of investigation and follow-up ( My link).

×
×
  • Create New...