Slip

1 hour ago, BobBKK said:

 

You quoted me Neeranam and we are on the same side lol 

"on the same side"?  Congratulations on the most vapid infantile post on this long thread packed with them.

19 minutes ago, MrMojoRisin said:

Hmmm.

No evidence?

Disproved?

Propaganda?

 

The New York Times, with all the resources available to them, have yet to get to the bottom of the mass murder at the Gaza hospital - perhaps it is a bit early for internet keyboard warriors to be spouting off, eh?

 

The competing claims have not been independently verified. The New York Times is working to assess the various accounts through an analysis of photos, video footage and other evidence, as well as on-the-ground interviews. - The New York Times

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/18/world/middleeast/gaza-hospital-israel-hamas-explained.html

I see you have been suitably humiliated for this post already, but really, try to establish some balance in your view.

Edit:  This.  Thank you.  I guess sometimes you have to labour a point because it can be forgotten quickly in a thread as monstrous as this.  

MrMogoRisin said:

Quote

I have no need to deflect anything for I am rational and sane enough to be able to judge both sides as being terrorists and being guilty of crimes against humanity...., those wishing to portray either side as being morally superior to the other though, these are the people in dire need of deflections - deflections away from the truth. 

6 minutes ago, MrMojoRisin said:

Updated information..... or manufactured misinformation.

Neither you nor I can know for sure the level of truthfulness of what either side says.

 

The very fact that it is a plausible possibility that Israel bombed the hospital and added another 500 innocent victims to their already in the many thousands kill count - tells every rational person all that they need to know about the morals of the IDF. 

This boils down to- an accusation is made by one side with no evidence to support it and is then disproved, you believe said propaganda, then you project that on to prove your thesis.  It doesn't work well.

2 minutes ago, Thorgal said:

Forum rules and moderators at AN require to backup facts.

 

That's what I did. Some forum member went even that far to send a PM to BBC to disagree...

 

To say that these clips came before information was available is pure speculation.

And I said it before : I can't promote false information. Sorry.

Literally NOTHING you post can be trusted.  I don't know why you are still posting.  You have zero credibility except to those looking to confirm their own biases.

14 minutes ago, Neeranam said:

I totally agree. 

 

Thanks for the answer.  I've learned a lot on this thread, I didn't know only experts were allowed to post. 

I have no horse in this race, like Piers Morgan just said in a interview I watched. He is a good, unbiased reporter, yet like me, gets unfairly labelled as a racist/antisemite.

<snipped that dreadful character>

 

You may note I said "well informed" not "expert".

However you are exactly one of the people who thrashes a partisan line with dozens of posts: Just the kind of person I was discussing.

Piers Morgan is an abomination and by no means good or unbiased, but I have no idea if he is antisemitic or not.

But I believe we all have a horse in the race one way or another.

EDIT: I meant to say that TRT world (Turkey) is still reporting it as an Israeli air attack despite all evidence otherwise. 

5 hours ago, Neeranam said:

There is another question, why would they blow up their own people? 

By mistake.

5 hours ago, Neeranam said:

Why did Biden cancel his meeting?

Oh dear.  For someone who posts incessantly on this thread you don't seem to be very well informed.  The Arabic parties cancelled the meeting.

I have avoided posting on these threads before so far.  The behaviour of both Hamas and the Israeli government are abhorrent, but watching posters of either ilk misrepresenting the situation to cast blame only on the other side is equally appalling.

6 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

And when he's released , he will be regarded as this generations Nelson Mandela, MLK or Ghandi 

You're aiming too low.  By his flock, he will be regarded as nothing short of the new messiah!  Well, he's not, he's a very naughty boy.  However, who cares how he is regarded on release? Most just want to regard him in a flaming orange jumpsuit to match his skin tone.

1 hour ago, Red Phoenix said:

WOW - Donald Trump Reveals Where He Stands on COVID in New Viral Video
<snip>   <--The appalling  affront to the language that Trump inflicts on us all.

So now we see why Wet Walt or whatever his name is floated this trial balloon from the op in the first place.

More manipulation and nonsense from MAGA.

10 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Ah, the relevant words are "convince the jury that what they told the grand jury under oath is true". Give the sheannigans they have been getting up to in recent years if I were on the jury I would have a hard time believing anything an FBI witness said.

 

As for not needing to prove that the documents are actually classified or important, pull the other one. Are you seriously saying there is no need to know what is inside the folder with Top Secret written on it? Could be a laundry list for all anyone on the jury would know on that basis. If I were on the jury and asked to believe something "just because", I'd acquit on the basis of reasonable doubt.

There is no way you would be on such a jury.  You would be weeded out as having obvious bias (assuming you answered questions truthfully).

17 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

I’m not a fan of contracting out  criminal Justice to criminals and I very much doubt Rampton or Broadmoor are anything like an ‘easy sentence’.

 

 

 

 

He isn't talking about criminal justice.  He is talking about revenge.

Good- I hope they throw the book at her.  

Fine- Incarcerate him while he awaits trial and give him all the time he needs.