TallGuyJohninBKK

So by your price controls illogic, former Republican presidents Gerald Ford and Richard Nixon must have been Marxists and Fascists as well: In 1971: "Nixon issued Executive Order 11615 (pursuant to the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970), imposing a 90-day freeze on wages and prices in order to counter inflation. This was the first time the U.S. government had enacted wage and price controls since World War II." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_shock And then later from 1975: FORD SIGNS BILL ON ENERGY THAT ENDS POLICY IMPASSE AND CUTS CRUDE OIL PRICES WASHINGTON, Dec. 22—President Ford ended a yearlong stalemate with. Congress over energy policy today by signing into law a bill that will roll back crude oil prices and help stabilize gasoline and fuel oil prices for consumers, at least temporarily. ... Cut in Crude Oil Price The new law will force a reduction in the average price of crude oil produced in the United States from the current $8.75 a barrel to $7.66 a barrel. The change will go into effect in February." Shocking what those Republican Marxist presidents were up to.... 😞 But when it comes to "fascism", the definition of that sounds a whole lot more like a different presidential candidate: "Not all scholars agree on what fascism is. Philosopher Jason Stanley of Yale University says it is "a cult of the leader who promises national restoration in the face of humiliation brought on by supposed communists, Marxists and minorities and immigrants who are supposedly posing a threat to the character and the history of a nation." That is, fascism focuses on one person as leader, fascism says communism is bad, and fascism says that at least one group of people is bad and has caused the nation's problems. This group could be people from other countries or groups of people within the country.[9] [BOLD emphasis added] https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism That sound a whole lot like the campaign platform and ravings of.... well, you know who.

Someone above kind of put their foot in it.... 🙂

Trump having "a somewhat promiscuous relationship with the truth" is pretty much like saying... ...water is wet!

Re part 1 above, maybe you should consult further with: Re part 2 above: Not that most people these days actually believe anything Donald Trump says is the "actual truth".

Can't let a dead dog lie... Once more from the OP: "To be doubly certain, I consulted a leading historian of American Marxism, Paul Buhle, a retired lecturer at Brown University. He said he had looked into Harris’ history and found no evidence of Marxist leanings. “It’s a slur,” he wrote in an email."

I did... in order to highlight the inanity and inaccuracy of Trump's name calling directed against VP Harris. As the OP report further noted: "For another thing, Harris has moved quickly and effectively to define her positions as squarely within the mainstream of current Democratic thinking: liberal, but a long way from anything resembling Marxism, which calls for government ownership of major industries." The majority of the public understand that, and recognizes Trump's tripe for what it is.

Say various of the posters here who regularly regurgitate Trump's nonsense name-calling tripe. Voters know Trump and recognize his name calling and him for what they are... nonsense.

From the same report above: "A Wall Street Journal poll released last week found that the vice president is viewed positively by 49% of voters, a gain of 14% since July. The same poll found that 59% of voters consider Trump “too extreme” to be president, but only 46% consider Harris too extreme. (That number, 46%, roughly matches already committed Trump voters’ share of the electorate.)" Then.... From the same OP report: "She has made some arguably progressive campaign proposals, including a federal ban on “price-gouging” by grocery stores; Trump denounced the idea as “Soviet-style price controls.” But it turned out to be broadly popular: An Economist-YouGov poll last month found that 60% of voters like the idea, including about half of Republicans." Trump can't win for trying...

Per the Los Angeles Times in the following news report. ..."Trump claimed, without a shred of evidence, that Vice President Harris, whom he has dubbed “Comrade Kamala,” “wants this country to go communist.” ... But his wild punches aren’t landing.... So why is Trump’s free-swinging rhetoric failing? For one thing, Harris isn’t — and never has been — a Marxist, and most voters appear to recognize that. ... To be doubly certain, I consulted a leading historian of American Marxism, Paul Buhle, a retired lecturer at Brown University. He said he had looked into Harris’ history and found no evidence of Marxist leanings. “It’s a slur,” he wrote in an email. (more) https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-calls-harris-a-marxist-a-communist-even-a-fascist-why-his-wild-punches-don-t-land/ar-AA1pQtYt

Long Covid symptoms in kids aren’t one-size-fits-all, study shows Headaches dominate in very young, fatigue in adolescents Aug. 21, 2024 Rachel Gross wants to clear up misconceptions about children and Covid-19. A pediatrician and population health researcher, she recalls a time four years ago when people didn’t think children could even contract the disease. Then, after accepting kids’ vulnerability to the virus, it was thought only adults could suffer from the myriad symptoms that persist or crop up post-infection, collectively known as long Covid. Now that it’s clear kids can also develop long Covid, Gross wants to correct assumptions that the condition looks the same in adults as in children, no matter their age. In new research published Wednesday in JAMA, Gross and the RECOVER-Pediatrics Consortium report that school-age children and adolescents experience similar long Covid symptoms across multiple organ systems, but those symptoms cluster in ways that vary depending on their age while diverging to some degree from the pattern seen in adults. As part of the federally funded RECOVER initiative focused on post-acute sequelae of SARS-Cov-2, or PASC for short, the study found that school-age children (6 to 11 years old) with prolonged symptoms were more likely than uninfected children to experience headaches (57%); trouble with memory, focusing, and sleeping (44%); and abdominal pain (43%) at least four weeks after Covid. Infected adolescents (12 to 17 years old) more often had daytime fatigue, sleepiness, and low energy (80%); body, muscle, or joint pain (55%); and trouble with memory and focusing (47%) post-infection than uninfected peers. (more) STAT https://www.statnews.com/2024/08/21/long-covid-symptoms-children-recover/ https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2822770

Here the concluding passage from the original New York Times opinion piece: "Whatever our politics, Trump brings out the worst in all of us. He nurtures hate on his side that we mirror. So let’s take a deep breath, summon F.D.R.’s empathy for the forgotten man, follow Clinton’s advice — and, for the sake of winning elections as well as of civility, remember that the best way to get others to listen to us is to first listen to them." Well, if nothing else, it's a rarity to find the words "Trump" and "civility" mentioned anywhere close to each other. But I do agree with the author's primary conclusion: "Trump brings out the worst in all of us." That's reason enough that he never should serve as U.S. president again, for the sake of the U.S. and the world.

A recent report found 5.8 million U.S. kids have long COVID. Here’s what you need to know now. Updated Aug 26, 2024 ...a new large analysis published this year in the journal Pediatrics found 5.8 million American kids have long COVID—symptoms lasting at least six months after infection. The report estimated that, much like adults, 10% to 20% of kids who get sick with COVID-19 develop this complex, poorly understood post-infection syndrome that can affect almost every system in the body. The problem is, it can be really hard to diagnose and even harder to find someone who recognizes the signs and knows how to help your child get better. Who Develops Long COVID? As we found out firsthand, any kid can develop long COVID. “Research indicates that long COVID can affect previously healthy children and adolescents, including those who experienced only mild cases of COVID-19,” says Carlos Oliveira, M.D., Ph.D., an assistant professor of pediatrics at the Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, CT. At the same time, he adds, kids who got severely ill during that initial infection have a potential double whammy, as they are “significantly more likely to develop long COVID.” ... The stakes are high, as many kids across the country and world are having their lives upended by long COVID, says Jessica Snowden, M.D., chief of pediatric infectious disease and vice dean for research at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in Little Rock, AR. “I hear from parents and children all the time who are struggling with a wide variety of long COVID symptoms, from school problems to breathing concerns.” (more) Health Central https://www.healthcentral.com/condition/coronavirus/pediatric-long-covid https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/153/3/e2023062570/196606/Postacute-Sequelae-of-SARS-CoV-2-in-Children

Long COVID is a $1 trillion problem with no cure. Experts plead for governments to wake up August 9, 2024 ... This form of COVID is particularly perilous because, for many people, its symptoms may last years (or a lifetime) and their effects may trigger all sorts of associated problems and costs. Long COVID “affects nearly every organ system,” the review notes, including the cardiovascular, immune, gastrointestinal and reproductive systems. While more than 200 symptoms have been identified, common symptoms include memory problems, difficulty concentrating, fatigue, heart palpitations, chronic cough, shortness or breath and recurring headaches. Chillingly, most people who develop long COVID did not have particularly vicious cases of the virus initially. That’s in part because so many more people experience a mild form of COVID rather than a severe one. (Across most studies, long COVID risk does increase with the severity of the initial infection.) And each time people become reinfected with the virus, they’re at risk of developing long COVID, even if they didn’t experience it previously. The authors note that studies on recovery from long COVID are “sparse and inconsistent.” But those that have closely evaluated individual manifestations of the virus have found recovery rates to be fairly low at one year, and only 7% to 10% fully recovered after two years. For millions and millions of people, the debilitating effects of long COVID are just that. (more) Fortune https://fortune.com/well/article/long-covid-cost-1-trillion-treatment-cure/

The condition has put significant strain on patients and society — at a global economic cost of about $1 trillion a year, a new report estimates. Aug. 9, 2024 About 400 million people worldwide have been afflicted with long Covid, according to a new report by scientists and other researchers who have studied the condition. The team estimated that the economic cost — from factors like health care services and patients unable to return to work — is about $1 trillion worldwide each year, or about 1 percent of the global economy. ... About 6 percent of adults globally have had long Covid. The authors evaluated scores of studies and metrics to estimate that as of the end of 2023, about 6 percent of adults and about 1 percent of children — or about 400 million people — had ever had long Covid since the pandemic began. They said the estimate accounted for the fact that new cases slowed in 2022 and 2023 because of vaccines and the milder Omicron variant. ... Many people have not fully recovered. The authors cited studies suggesting that only 7 percent to 10 percent of long Covid patients fully recovered two years after developing long Covid. They added that “some manifestations of long Covid, including heart disease, diabetes, myalgic encephalomyelitis and dysautonomia are chronic conditions that last a lifetime.” ... Treatment remains one of the biggest challenges. There is still too little known about treating long Covid, the authors wrote, and there remains a “near-total absence of evidence from randomized clinical trials to guide treatment decisions.” (more) New York Times https://archive.ph/IefAs https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-024-03173-6

Thailand MoPH Weekly COVID report for Aug. 25 - 31, 2024: For the week: --569 new COVID hospitalizations (red) --1 new COVID death (gray) --212 COVID patients currently hospitalized in serious condition (pneumonia type symptoms) (dark purple) --91 COVID patients currently hospitalized requiring ventilation/intubation in order to breathe (light purple) https://ddc.moph.go.th/covid19-dashboard/?dashboard=main

New Covid Vaccines Are Coming. Here’s What to Know. We asked experts about the right time to get a shot, and how long protection will last. Aug. 22, 2024 [Among the questions answered in the full New York Times report linked below:] How are the new shots different? What if I just had Covid? How fast does protection kick in? When should I get vaccinated? New York Times https://archive.ph/iZasE

It's kind of weird (to use that popular term lately)! The OP opinion piece here is actually about what the author thinks could be a political civil war within the Republican Party if Trump loses the election. But a lot of the comments here in this thread have ended up being about the potential other kind of real civil war, like the U.S. got a brief taste of during the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection. Normally, you wouldn't think the latter even fathomable... But then you look at a lot of the absurd extremist political rhetoric being dished out here on this forum (some share of it probably by non-Americans), and you begin to wonder.... What happens if Harris wins the election, but the Trump election deniers that Republicans have placed in many election departments around the country refuse to count or certify the ballots. Or Republicans in Congress go another round at attempting to do the same with the state election results? We seem to be living in perilous times. New Report Details Terrifying Threat of Trump’s Election Deniers Election deniers hold crucial roles in elections in multiple swing states At least 70 pro–Donald Trump election denialists are working as election officials in key swing states, according to a report published Monday from Rolling Stone and the right-wing extremism research newsletter American Doom. Officials who had promoted election conspiracy theories were identified in at least 16 counties in six swing states: Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. These individuals were identified through scouring coverage of refusals to certify 2020 election results and other denialist behavior, as well as sifting through the social media profiles of election officials in these states. Across these swing states, Trump loyalists stand ready to disrupt the results of democratically held elections—at least 22 of them have already refused or delayed certification in recent years, indicating likely chaos in November. (more) https://newrepublic.com/post/184340/trump-election-deniers-power-swing-states https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/trump-how-georgia-officials-wrote-rules-deny-election-results-1235089385/

August 30, 2024 A growing proportion of Americans believe COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and are unwilling to be vaccinated or to recommend it to others, according to the latest national health survey by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania. ... False beliefs proliferate As of July, 28% of survey respondents mistakenly believed that COVID-19 vaccines have caused thousands of deaths, up from 22% in June 2021, while the proportion who know this is untrue fell from 66% to 55% over the same period. Twenty-two percent of Americans believe the falsity that it's less risky to get infected with COVID-19 than to get the vaccine, more than double the 10% with the belief in the months following the 2021 vaccine rollout. The proportion of respondents who mistakenly think that COVID-19 vaccines change human DNA reached 15%, nearly double the 8% who believed it in 2021. ... The skepticism extends to other vaccines as well, with 32% unsure of the effectiveness of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine aimed at young people, 23% uncertain about the pneumonia vaccine, 19% doubting the shingles vaccine, and 47% unsure about the RSV vaccine during pregnancy or at age 60 and older (37%). (more) https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/covid-19/survey-reveals-growing-american-distrust-vaccines-covid-other-infectious-diseases COVID-19 Misinformation & Vaccine Perceptions Perceptions of Vaccine Safety and Efficacy "Vaccines are one of the great success stories of public health. Vaccination has eliminated or nearly eliminated some diseases (e.g., smallpox and polio). For others, such as COVID-19, it has significantly decreased the number of people experiencing severe illness, hospitalization, and death because of infection. Unfortunately, recent years have seen declines in Americans’ perceptions that a variety of vaccines are safe and effective (see Figure 5). Although most respondents still report these vaccines as safe (65-81%) and effective (61-83%), respondents surveyed showed significant declines in perceptions of safety for MMR and COVID-19 vaccines, and in perceptions of efficacy for MMR, seasonal flu, and pneumonia vaccines. COVID-19 Vaccine Perceived as Less Safe & Effective than Other Vaccines: Our respondents consider MMR and seasonal flu vaccines, which have existed for decades, safer and more effective (75-83%) than the more recent COVID-19 vaccines (65-66%). Evidence from the CDC suggests that COVID-19 vaccines are actually more effective than flu vaccines. There has also been an increase in perceptions that the COVID-19 vaccines are very or somewhat unsafe (from 18% to 24%)." https://cdn.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/asaph-report-summer-2024.pdf

Obviously you mean post-election like this: January 6 United States Capitol attack "On January 6, 2021, the United States Capitol Building in Washington, D.C. was attacked by a mob[39][40][41] of supporters of then-U.S. president Donald Trump, two months after his defeat in the 2020 presidential election. They sought to keep Trump in power by occupying the Capitol and preventing a joint session of Congress counting the Electoral College votes to formalize the victory of President-elect Joe Biden. The attack was ultimately unsuccessful in preventing the certification of the election results. According to the bipartisan House select committee that investigated the incident, the attack was the culmination of a seven-part plan by Trump to overturn the election." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack

See above for a rebuttal of your incorrect claim, at least as regards THIS particular article.

Maybe you should actually read just who wrote the original version of the Opinion piece above. Desperate stuff from the left??? Try again! If Trump loses, expect a Republican civil war by Myra Adams, Opinion Contributor - 08/30/24 7:00 AM ET ... "Myra Adams is an opinion writer who served on the creative team of two Republican presidential campaigns, in 2004 and 2008." https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4853672-trump-biden-2024-republican-party/ https://x.com/MyraKAdams https://myraadams.com/about-2/

That might be what you get, sometimes, when the article in question is an OPINION article!

Just for some U.S. background on that: I did a count the other day of the U.S. CDC's weekly COVID deaths reports. By the early part of August, U.S. COVID deaths were approaching 30,000 for thus far in calendar year 2024, if I did my maths right. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#trends_weeklydeaths_select_00 In the CDC's recent report on the top 10 U.S. causes of death for 2023, COVID was number 10 on the list. Influenza was somewhere further down on the list just based on death counts. https://aseannow.com/topic/1335279-covid-drops-to-10th-leading-provisional-cause-of-death-in-us-for-2023/

COVID is estimated to be infecting nearly 1 million people per day in the U.S. right now, and the weekly COVID death toll rose to almost 900 with the latest CDC update. Neither is the case for the flu, as shown below: Respiratory Illnesses Data Channel Reported on Friday, August 30th, 2024. "Seasonal influenza and RSV activity are low nationally, but COVID-19 activity is elevated in most areas. COVID-19 COVID-19 activity is elevated nationally, with continued increases in many areas and early signs of decline in others. COVID-19 test positivity, emergency department visits, and rates of COVID-19–associated hospitalizations remain elevated, particularly among adults 65+ and children under 2 years." https://www.cdc.gov/respiratory-viruses/data/index.html

U.S. FDA authorizes Novavax’s updated Covid vaccine, paving way for fall rollout Aug 30 2024 The Food and Drug Administration authorized Novavax’s updated protein-based Covid vaccine for emergency use in people ages 12 and up on Friday, paving the way for the shot to compete with Pfizer and Moderna’s jabs this fall and winter. Novavax’s vaccine targets the highly contagious omicron subvariant JN.1, which began circulating widely in the U.S. earlier this year. JN.1 only accounted for 0.2% of cases circulating nationwide as of this week, according to the latest Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data. Novavax manufactures protein-based vaccines, which cannot be quickly updated to target another strain of the virus. Despite that, the biotech company has noted that its shot provides protection against descendants of JN.1 that are currently dominant in the U.S., including KP.2.3, KP.3, KP.3.1.1 and LB.1. ... Public health officials see Novavax’s vaccine as a valuable alternative for people who don’t want to take mRNA shots from Pfizer and Moderna, which use a newer vaccine method to teach cells how to make proteins that trigger an immune response against Covid. (more) https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/30/fda-authorizes-novavax-protein-covid-vaccine.html