MikeandDow

do you live in a different world, you need to start naming these so called oligarchs methinks it all in your mind fairytails, would love to hear some of these oligarchs, and thaksin was a policeman to start off with

He has said that he is the executor of his fathers estate the shares are NOT in his name, dont know where you have gotten this from, please ref your source as iam not aware of this ???The shares have NOT been sold as this would be breaking the law, the company ITV is in litigation with the goverment and shares can not be sold, your info totally incorrect.

And the smallest country in the world

I totaly agree, I can not see any reason why he transfed the shares, the ec and naac knew about the shares a long time ago and gave the green light. the courts have ruled on other MP and senitors holding media shaes and because the share holding is very low can not influence the media company the court ruled all ok,but i know the thai courts do not use Precedent, but i think he should have just carried on and not done anything , but this is thailand . Look at the latest because he wrote a couple of books they are saying he is running a media compay !!!! there id a differance books are literature nothing to do with media but thai's will be thai;s

because he is Executor of the estate, any how he told the ec and nacc all about the shares a long time ago he got the green light all ok and they know they made a mistake as they did not think he would win the election if you look into the history of holding share you will see a lot of MP senitors who hold shares in media companys but because they dont have a lot of share dont have influance the courst have said no problems

A Non vote is a NON vote, this is your opionion but totally incorrect it very obvious you have no idea Thais are very lazy a lot dont give a damm thats why a lot did not vote, but MF won the election and hopfully can form a goverment and that will represent the whole of the thai people

if you dont belive thar BP is biases to the military more fool you. In Thailand if there is a court case you can not sell the shares, and ITV is in a court case, therefore Pita could not sell the shares, pita was executor of the shares, the shares were tranfered no money passed hands, as executor in Thailand it mean he was NOT the owner the shares, The shares where not tranfered into his name they are owned by his father

Abstention from voting is a form of exercising one's right to vote. When someone confirms that they are abstaining from voting, it means they are voting neither for nor against the motion at hand. They are nevertheless taking part in the election through expressing neither approval nor disapproval for a particular candidate, party or motion. he need 376votes from MP or senators

No you dont have to be owner, the shares where tranfered Pita transferred his shares to his relatives sometime ago without any benefit from it. He can not sell those shares anyway because itv was not list on the SET. Remember BP is a military newspaper they want to bring MF down

Have you read his posts !!! I respect he has an opionion but NOT blatant rubbish which most of his post are in my opionion

I really like to know how you are stating that the Thai people dont have a consensus, have you taken a survey of the people ???? dont just rely on the figure you have quoted all that could of changed, all we have is that MF is trying to form a goverment and that goverment will represent ALL the thai people, and that is all the artical is saying A General agreement if you dont agree tuff

again which other similar countries, so we have gone from ( It is the best developed country in the region) to doing very well Which is it ??? you should learn not to post the first thing that pop into you head research it first wit FACTS

And how do you know he was the owner ???? full of rubbish again, you need to state Facts not your opinion

google is your friend, do you know how to use google

WOW so You are speaking for the Thai people again you are talking rubbish

There are a Lot of better developed countrys in the region, more powerfull that Thailand Google is ur friend

get it in your brain there are NO STATES in Thailand

well why do you post rubbish just get ur facts right

You have no idea !!!! a consensus is a opionion and that is what the article is about an OPIONION

I dont think you know the meaning of consensus !!!! this is what it means a generally accepted opinion or decision among a group of people and to me MF has a consensus of the people acording to ur figures MF won the election

You are the one stating Thailand "It is the best developed country in the region. " i belive sinapore is in asia and is smaller than Thailand and has less pop and it is far more developed that thailand so which is it ??? or are you just posting rubbish again

What has size got to do with it for being a country and now you are saying sinapore is a country make up your mind, and i accept your apologie

Totally agree, Chinese quality is very poor, like stepping back into the 1940"s

God!!!! this is utter rubbish!!!!! For 1 Thailand does not have "states"

From Wikipedia, Singapore (/ˈsɪŋ(ɡ)əpɔːr/ (listen)), officially the Republic of Singapore, is an island country and city-state in maritime Southeast Asia. the capital city is called lion city