MikeandDow

And the government want to give them money !!!!!!!!

Does the guy know anything about the job NO !!! convicted Muppet, People are now find out about these muppets the EC and CC are going to be busy !!

Don't forget the Alcoholics, Gamblers,and the Drug addicts they need there 10000 fix

Good joke !!!! Thailand has never been great!!

What is going to happen in reality NOTHING !!!!!

As evidenced by the last election, populist policies will no longer be enough to appease voters. The spectre looming in the background is what has been voiced by the disenfranchised 14 million voters that chose the now-dissolved Move Forward Party: constitutional reform – in particular, institutional reform. Yes, the judiciary plays an important role. They should be independent and unelected, not necessarily entirely answerable to the people. But this is exactly why its powers should be clearly delimited. There should be clearer separation of powers, checked and balanced with the other branches of government. In this sense, their powers of interpretation should not be tantamount to judicial coups. With the judicial interference in the democratic legislative process through overly broad interpretations – from holding that a mere proposal to amend section 112 of the Criminal Code is grounds for banning people from politics to this current case – the Constitutional Court has toppled more than enough democratically elected leaders on questionable grounds. And this is just a microcosm of how the powers that be make a mockery of the highest, supposedly elected, office in the country. All this points to one thing: the case for constitutional reform remains stronger than ever. If anything, the Constitutional Court’s verdict is a reminder that reform is a real, relevant and recurrent issue not to be swept under the rug of populist discourse. The office of the prime minister should hold more meaning than what the unelected institutions, including the Constitutional Court and the Election Commission, are giving it. Such reform cannot be excluded from the national agenda forever. If Thailand wants to show that it is truly open for business, it’s going to take more than cash handouts. It’s going to mean taking a long, hard look at our country, strengthening the rule of law, and building strong, robust, and accountable institutions. This is the precondition for development.

In reality what do you think is going to happen NOTHING !!!!!!!

Nothing will happen

This Doctor is a "Nut job " the shear arrogance of the guy !!!

Wayyyyyyyyy to early to say

Lots and lots of nut jobs in Thailand

Read somewhere can be 10yr ban but it will take some time for this to happen see the other news about a cc judge Thailand is a big mess

glad to help

There should be only 1 criteria, be able to do the job, Why place a police officer in charge of the Ministry of Education, an inexperienced person in charge of environmental issues,

google is your friend Under the 2007 Constitution, the Constitutional Court has nine members, all serving for nine year terms and appointed by the King with senatorial advice: Three are SCJ judges and are selected by the SCJ plenum through secret ballot.

Of course he is right BUT its going to be lifetimes before Thailand changes for the better

"some people will just use it on cigarettes and booze," bit of naive statement, giving money to drug addicts alcoholics and gamblers to feed there habits, i think this will cause a lot of problems in the family when theses addicts have spent there part but mum and dad have not what do you think is going to happen ??

yes, that's going to happen in a lot of Thai households, don't forget the gambling

you are dreaming Referencing Section 67 of the Corrections Act 2017, this certificate is not merely a piece of paper—it’s a formal attestation that the individual has been legally discharged and granted the liberty to travel abroad. that is all, he still has a criminal record and is classed as convicted Felon in the eyes of Thai law

And the other one Chada the gangster, Why place a police officer in charge of the Ministry of Education, an inexperienced person in charge of environmental issues, or someone with ties to organized crime in positions meant to combat such activities. Individuals with a history of criminal activity should also be excluded from government roles to maintain public trust.

Worst thing they could do give cash.

Sorry you have to do that lots of poster can not figure out what you are posting about on here. lots of immature posts like your self, but you must agree it was a stupid question

Think the bell will be ringing constantly

"The minister wanted to know if the money had really been spent on athletes’ training, Mr Jirawat said". this guy should be sacked does not know where the money has gone

This will keep happing Lack of enforcement and training