Jump to content

puchooay

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    3,071
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by puchooay

  1. 12 minutes ago, LaosLover said:

    As Clint Eastwood said, "If you want a guarantee, buy a toaster".

     

    I substantially helped raise 3 children via-step-parents arrangements. We're all 100% estranged. It's the outcome about 95% of the time: they stick with Mom -and Mom is done with you.

     

    You will indeed be forgotten. It's nothing personal. That child will not be at your death bed. Be grateful for the love experience and get on with your life.

     

    As to the rest of it, if you move to a poor, ultra-traditional place, there's going to be a lot of pettiness, resistance to outsiders and generalized, poor education dysfunction.

     

    Hello? You moved to the Buddhist equivalent of the Bible Belt? I lived in Appalachia and I had all of the same complaints, except for the kiddy-fiddling part (but with Baptist dry drunks -who knows?).

    Still banging the same drum, I see. Totally blind comments.

  2. 16 minutes ago, StayinThailand2much said:

    That is rubbish. I've been there, and I found it absolutely boring. But if you like to live, like the OP wrote, on a farm there or in the sticks, go for it!

    You clearly have not kept up with the posts on the thread and are basing your comments on a visit you made. 

     

    When did you visit Isaan and how long did you stay? Which province did you stay in? 

  3. 1 hour ago, StayinThailand2much said:

    Some people love to live on a farm in Thailand's Northeast, others want to move to North Korea, or the desert. Good for you if this is your thing...

    That still doesn't explain why you wrote a load of rubbish about Isaan when it seems you've likely never even been there.

    • Thumbs Up 1
    • Haha 1
  4. 2 hours ago, placeholder said:

    In none of these studies had the trans participants undergone hormone therapy. This parameter was established so as to preclude any effects on the structure of the brain.

     

    In this one they started with a normalizing process that was 305 women and 242 men. A normalizing process is one in which norms are established. In this case the norm for cisgender men and cisgender women. Once that was established 24 cisgender men 24 cisgender women and 24 transgender women had their brains scanned.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8955456/

     

    this one used 40 transgender adolescents and 39 cisgender adolescents

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0306453017305590?via%3Dihub

     

    This one had 29 trans men and 17 trans women

    https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hbm.25905

     

     

    How many of those scanned had abnormalities with regards to their sexuality?

  5. 1 hour ago, placeholder said:

    And you have proof of its rarity? Although the fact that you used "may" indicates that you've got nothing.

    Whereas scienitist who actually imaged the brains of people who said they were transgender, found significant discrepancies between their biological sex and the gender they felt they really belonged to.

    How many people were involved in these brain scans?

  6. 11 minutes ago, onthedarkside said:

    You were more than asking questions, you made a statement:

     

     

    That is a fact. I will make statements when there are facts to back them up.

     

    The post I was referring to was full of questions.

     

    It's quite amazing that, whilst showing 2 sides of this complicated case, whilst constantly stating I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with any part, whilst never having stated what side of the fence I am on, I'm accused of all sorts of things.

     

    Criminology is fascinating. How different criminal minds work is fascinating. How the system has changed is interesting. The way criminals were diagnosed mad and how they were treated in asylums is tragic.

    • Confused 1
  7. 15 minutes ago, placeholder said:

    Whether or not they believe the lawyers case is a deflection is utterly irrelevant to the fact your latest response is another attempt at deflection.

    No need for them to "believe" the lawyer. He us telling the truth. He's not allowed to lie. It's a matter of how the parole board balance the appeal for parole.

     

    It's the fact that I have the ability to see things both ways that appears  something you cannot comprehend.

     

    Nothing I have written is untrue or "false" as you have suggested. I'm purely showing both sides of the situation.

     

    If you want to believe I'm deflecting, that's fine. Even though your accusations are a result of a blinkered view.

    • Confused 1
  8. 1 minute ago, placeholder said:

    I did get it wrong that you claimed 18 years. I believe it was only 12. That said your contention that has served 18 years more than the total of sentence is false. All this other stuff about the merits of his case is a deflection.

    I hope the parole board don't erroneously believe the lawyers case is deflection. It is all part of the law in UK. 

    • Confused 1
  9. 12 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

    While he's never been charged with an attempt to kill according to his own confession in his book:

     

    "I was killing a man before their very eyes and getting away with it. His whole body was shaking like he was having a fit. I heard the death rattle. His face had turned blue, his eyes were bulging and his tongue hung down on his chin. This monster was on his way out and I felt so happy. He was getting off lightly for what he had done to that little girl."

     

    MAD, BAD & DANGEROUS: I saw his eyes bulge as I choked life out of monster.. it felt so good.

    https://www.thefreelibrary.com/MAD%2C+BAD+%26+DANGEROUS%3A+I+saw+his+eyes+bulge+as+I+choked+life+out+of...-a060952074

     

     

    Strange he was never charged for it. Did he exagarate it in his book for effect? He says "before their very eyes". Whose eyes? Maybe the prison officers allowed it to happen. The victim was a peado. Wouldn't be the first time they've turned a blind eye to such things. Ian Huntley was attacked even though he was supposed to be in isolation.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...