.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
puchooay
-
Posts
3,071 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by puchooay
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
4 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:Pointing out an observable fact is not ‘knocking the Royal family’.
An off topic observable fact. As you yourself pointed out. Also one that last took place nearly 2 centuries ago.
Sounds like knocking.
-
6
-
1
-
15 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:
Please post links to this plentiful evidence there is a campaign ongoing to change the wording of roald dahls writings.
Like I said.
Those with the ability to digest and consider the meanings of what they have read and learnt,l don't need to be given links to nurse them to the evidence.
-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:
Nope. No evidence for that at all. Just conspiracy theory nonsense.
Plenty of evidence if you care to view with an open mind, witness what is going on around you and acknowledge not everything in life needs a link to be proven.
Try walking the road of life more towards the middle. It is far more enlightening
-
1
-
1
-
-
10 hours ago, connda said:
I've taught here for 3 years in a private school. I wouldn't teach in a public school. The wages suck and there are other countries where the requirements are less of a hassle and the money is significantly better. Teaching in a private school was more like a hobby where I could make 40K a month. Thai public schools. <head shake>
The salary difference between private and public is not as clear cut you make out.
I've known public school salaries easily above the 40k salary you quote.
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, placeholder said:
But not pitiful like someone who offers an arbitrary judgement without reasoning to back it up.
You are right.
Those kind of posters should shut up and leave.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, placeholder said:
Because the care in question is primarily about the fetus/baby. They're not claiming that the care is in regards to any condition of hers except pregnancy.
You definitely need to look up the meaning of "obvious".
You are funny.
The obvious thing is you can't see what's in front of you.
-
1
-
-
-
2
-
-
16 minutes ago, placeholder said:
Such nonsense. Whatever I called it doesn't matter. And it has nothing to do with the fact that legal clearly stated that grounds for calling the detention illegal was that the child or fetus was not being given proper care. Your claim was that they were objecting to detention per se. That is clearly not the case. It was about care.
Yep. Just about care.
That's why the case was filed on behalf of the unborn child using the Florida law on life at conception.
If it were solely about care, why was the filing not in the name of the incarcerated woman? It is her that receives the care, or not, after all.
It's all obvious really.
-
3 minutes ago, stevenl said:
Since you can't answer the question and seem to agree about the source it's clear your statement was incorrect.
Glad we agree these changes are nonsense but a hyperbole like yours doesn't enhance your argument.
Not incorrect at all. I was pointing you in the direction if a substantiated answer, as that seems to be what people need on here.
-
1
-
-
On 2/16/2023 at 8:11 PM, ezzra said:
At 1.6+ million baht owing to them the hospital has every right to asks for their money, the problem is with the UK travel insurance that drags their feet in covering the expenses and not adding to the already mounting miseries and pains of everybody.
More likely the insurance doesn't cover unlicensed motorcycle riders.
There have been a few of these stories recently. When will people learn?
-
5 minutes ago, stevenl said:
What is the woke community?
Looks like these changes are done by the people in charge of it, being the publishing house and the estate. Personally I think it's nonsense, but most likely it's being done to help sales, now or in the future.
Get yourself a dictionary. Look up "woke" and then look up "community". That should give you the answer.
I too think the changes are nonsense, I hope it back fires on them. Next thing we know Oliver Twist will be "financially challenged". Fagin was ugly. 555
-
1 hour ago, placeholder said:
What don't you understand about the fact the the grounds for the claim that the fetus is being unlawfully detained is that the fetus is not being given proper care.
"The filing was made on behalf of the unborn child and calls for Harrell to be discharged from jail until the child is born so she can receive proper care."
Whilst using the law that the foetus is a person in it's own right. The claim was filed on behalf of, in the eyes of law in Florida, the child.
You clearly disagree with this filing as you refer to "foetus" and not "child" or "baby". Thus, basically and fundamentally, agreeing with my post.
-
8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
Well I wonder what you meant by this:
What part of "can't" don't you understand?
-
6 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:
Double switch.
It’s the Florida law that claims a fetus is a baby, the litigant is using ‘the legal’ definition, not ‘having it both ways’.
I have never said she is having it both way.
-
5 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:
Did you miss "In an emergency petition in a Florida court, Ms Harrell's lawyer argued that jail staff have endangered the child through "a lack of reasonable and necessary prenatal care". ?
Where is that saying about being held for "no reason"?
You obviously missed "now in prison awaiting trial, she claims her baby is being unlawfully detained".
-
9 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:
From the OP I think her point is that she doesn't get proper pre natal care. I wonder if there are any other prisoners in the same situation, and the case could easily be resolved by providing "proper" pre natal care.
If it can be proven that the pre natal care is insufficient then she has a case, IMO.
No. She's trying to get released on the grounds her "baby" is being held for no reason. From the OP, that'd made quite obvious.
-
1
-
-
45 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:
The accused is trying to get herself out of jail by being "clever" and her opinion isn't the law
Exactly my point. The prosecution need to point out it goes both ways.
-
21 minutes ago, Mac Mickmanus said:
It was a foetus , it wasn't a minor
Not according to the accused.
My point was, if it is being held against it's will. It has to be considered when prosecuting the accused. Can't gave it both ways.
-
Is there a law in Florida against taking a minor with you while you commit murder?
If so, that needs to be added to the charge sheet.
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
Suffice to say, it’s not Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Microsoft et al amongst the high profit tech companies.
Quite correct. Why?
Becase the app is a blocker at connection level. It covers the device, not platforms. Nothing to do with using products from the companies you quoted.
Once fully developed I can see the big phone manufacturers buying the technology and selling their devices with it pre loaded.
Good luck to SafetoNet. A company with little over £1m paid up capital. I hope they make millions out of this..
-
1
-
-
55 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
Good news, but why is this left to individuals to deal with.
Social Media Platforms routinely scan images link them to accounts, files shared over the internet are traceable during sharing, source and destination are knowable.
Why aren’t the social media and tech giants raking in vast profits using their technology to identify, block and report child sexual images?
If volunteers can set up an app to block these images, how very much more could tech giants achieve?!
The volunteers are not setting up the app.
The volunteers will download the app and test it in real time.
It's called System Testing. In integral part in software development.
-
Just completed my wife's FLR application.
She was given a partial waiver on IHS payment. Didn't apply for one. Just appeared.
Anyone else had one?
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, Bluespunk said:No idea why or what you think I’m agreeing with, but given your posting history I seriously doubt I do.
What exactly do you think I should explain?
My posts have just pointed out who is behind these changes-the company that profits from dahl’s writing to be clear, not some right wing mythical culture war agenda - really don’t see how that can be explained any further.
I asked you a question.
As usual, you sidestepped that question as you knew the answers would contradict what you wrote.
Never mind. Ho hum.????????
-
2
-
1
-
1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:
I don’t have to explain anything as I am not responsible for any changes being made. The changes made are those decided upon by the roald Dahl company not me.
They are the ones who profit from dahl’s writing and I am sure any such changes are motivated by commercial reasons rather than any imaginary culture war bogeyman. They no doubt see a need to compete against more current childrens authors/genres.
Thanks for confirming you agree with me. Your lack of desire to explain speaks volumes. Thanks again.
-
1
-
1
-
Marriage age raised to 18 in England and Wales in an effort to better protect children from forced marriage
in UK & Europe Topics and Events
Posted
I disagree. Each and every individual is different and should be treated as such.