rattlesnake

I encourage you to be less defensive. Post-exposure prophylaxis is not the same thing as "vaccination" in the commonly accepted sense. If @Red Phoenix wants to add any information or correct anything I am saying, he is welcome to, but as far as I am concerned, citing a post-exposure rabies treatment to justify "vaccination" as it exists in 2025 (17 doses injected into babies by the age of 6 months) is a false equivalence fallacy and nothing else.

That's pretty much it, really.

It's a cult, as evidenced by the hostility towards those who break away from it.

Post-exposure treatment is a reasonable thing to do indeed in this case, I doubt anyone will deny that.

"May", "could", "according to predictions"… Thanks for the insights, compelling indeed.

RFK is leading another study on it, in no such dubious conditions. That's good news, isn't it? It should settle the matter.

Hence the term "almost". Three deaths is statistically insignificant, and one of the deceased children is confirmed to have died of respiratory failure as a result of malpractice. The current outbreak is not out of the ordinary, it is just that the media are making it look otherwise for those who are still gullible enough to take what they say at face value without checking information independently.

I am fully aware of the photos and accepted narrative. What I am now interested in is how many people of that generation actually saw/knew of such cases (not that I deny the reality of these ailments, I just question how prevalent they were). According to Dr. Suzanne Humphries, a large part of what is called "polio" is actually caused by poisoning from neurotoxic pesticides such as DDT, as the outbreaks always match(ed) the areas where they were/are used, including nowadays. This is documented with sources, so regardless of what one concludes, she can't conveniently be pushed into the "whackjob on social media" square (not by anyone rational and honest, that is).

A 70 year-old saying he never saw it is notable and brings nuance. I'll ask my dad (72) about it when I have a chance.

And yet these threads are rife with them ("I had three Covid jabs and feel fine"…).

Of course, eugenics is always at the root of these endeavours in the name of a proclaimed superiority. They had the choice (and were encouraged) to leave Germany (lots did).

A mass-scale solution to finally get rid of “parasitic vermin” worthy only of eradication. I'm sure I've read this somewhere before…

One example of many, former Australian MP Dr. Kerryn Phelps, who was initially pro-vaccine but changed her stance after she and her partner were both seriously injured: Dr Kerryn Phelps reveals ‘devastating’ Covid vaccine injury, says doctors have been ‘censored’ Dr Kerryn Phelps has broken her silence about a “devastating” Covid vaccine injury, slamming regulators for “censoring” public discussion with “threats” to doctors. […] She revealed she had spoken with other doctors “who have themselves experienced a serious and persistent adverse event” but that “vaccine injury is a subject that few in the medical profession have wanted to talk about”. “Regulators of the medical profession have censored public discussion about adverse events following immunisation, with threats to doctors not to make any public statements about anything that ‘might undermine the government’s vaccine rollout’ or risk suspension or loss of their registration,” she said. https://www.news.com.au/technology/science/human-body/dr-kerryn-phelps-reveals-devastating-covid-vaccine-injury-says-doctors-have-been-censored/news-story/0c1fa02818c99a5ff65f5bf852a382cf

So much for "science", eh? Speak against the almighty doxa and face persecution. The message is clear to all those who might be tempted to speak out. The incentive to shut up and just go along with it is immense. History keeps repeating itself… and there is never any shortage of Good Germans to help perpetuate the cycle.