Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

spidermike007

Advanced Member
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by spidermike007

  1. 1 hour ago, connda said:

    If I compare my life and expenses in my village as opposed to living in the US state where I still vote and maintain my residency - well, there is no comparison.  Life in Thailand allows me to live very well on a fix income and modest retirement savings.  If I returned to the US?  Just as a comparison, the new 1 bedroom apartment I rented in 2007 that cost $550 a month is now $1000.  Now is that reflected in the US inflation index and adjustments to Social Security?  <laughs and laughs and laughs>  So Ok!  The price of a cup of ice cream from an ice cream vendor on the streets of Chiang Mai increased from 10 THB to 20 THB.  Do I think that Thais should increase prices fractionally like from 10 to 12 THB or 10 to 15 THB?  Of course.  Is it going to break me?  <laughs and laughs and laughs>  I don't know about ya'll who live within the farang communities in Pattaya, Phuket, Bangkok, and Chiang Mai and shop upscale.   But here in rural Thailand?  Life is beyond good.  Life is wonderful. 
    I hope the Thai government doesn't go out of their way to screw that up.  That's my only real fear.

     

    Good point. Where I used to live in Los Angeles, a two bedroom apartment, or small house in West LA, Santa Monica, or a comparably decent area is now $3,000 to $4,000 a month. That is 100,000 to 130,000 baht a month! It is insanity. A cell phone account, with the same data as the one I have here that cost me $25 a month, is $135 a month. A modest lunch is $30. The same seat that I had redone on my scooter for $13, is $275 in Los Angeles. A visit to my house from an AC guy, to clean my AC unit is $16 here. $125 minimum in the US. A visit from a plumber here is $15. In the US, $150. A visit to the emergency room is $2,200. For a 40 minute visit. Here it is well under $100. The prices are insane. And even more insane is the nonsense they are feeding us about 3% inflation. More like 15%. Or higher. Every time I go back the prices have shot up. On nearly everything. I do not know how the average person is surviving there, and can see why the middle class is shrinking to such an alarming degree. 

     

    Granted, there are some things like good wine that are far cheaper. But, most things here are alot more reasonable. Especially anything connected to labor. 

  2. In this day and age of disinformation, deflection, distortion, and deliberate misleading of the voters, and the populace, it is more important than ever to be able to distinguish between weak, feckless, ill conceived, misguided, ruthless criticism of the media, and truth. Truth is truth, even though very weak, and unhinged men like Rudy will attempt to tell you otherwise, in an effort to protect their masters. Same goes here. It is something the public needs to be vigilant about. The media is NOT the enemy. The distortionists, and liars are. 

  3. Why does this happen? Who gets "involved" with someone online, without ever meeting them? First is all, the biggest variable when you meet someone online, is whether or not you will like them once you see them. Do you find them attractive? Do they find you appealing? Is there any chemistry? Is she emotionally developed, or a stunted, emotional retard? There is no shortage of women that fit that category here. Would you want to be with her any longer than an hour, once you meet her? If not, what do you do once you have made this rather grand and rather silly commitment of your time?

     

    I guess it comes down to self esteem. When I was doing online dating, I always limited the first encounter to 15-30 minutes, over a cup of coffee. And 90% of the time I was very glad I had followed that protocol. I also limited the number of contacts prior to that cup of coffee to three. I do not have any interest in having pen pals. And Thai women love to chat, and text, and you end up wasting alot of hours on someone you have never met, and more than likely are not going to get with once you do meet her, for a couple of dozen reasons. The numbers are not on your side, so why invest the time, once you have made the contact? What would Bond do?

     

    Always remember one very important fact. You are a man. You have as much control as you are able to establish. You set the agenda. Time is always your ally. Not hers. She is almost always going to be in a hurry to make things happen. And lastly, if she is willing to come and stay with a guy she has never met before, she has more than likely been working as a bar girl, in a special massage parlor, or as an escort or freelancer. Very few real "civilians" would move that fast, nor be that forward. Buyer beware. And be good to yourself. Be a man. Leave behind the Western ways of emasculation. 

  4. 5 hours ago, Hanaguma said:

    Walls/barriers work. It's pretty simple, otherwise they wouldn't exist in places outside the US context. 

     

    They aren't perfect, but that is not being claimed. Nor are they necessary for the entire border area, but that is not being claimed either. They ARE effective in certain situations and certain locations.  Remember the migrant caravans of last November? What would have happened had their not been a wall between Tijuana and the US when they stormed the border in an attempt to enter the US illegally?

     

    It has become a political football rather than a national security issue for a number of reasons:

     

    1/ Chuck and Nan can't stomach giving in to Trump, no matter the merits of the situation

    2/ Chuck and Nan face growing resistance from the younger, farther left leaning members of their own party, and may be put out of power if they compromise

    3/ It looks a tad hypocritical for Pelosi to call a wall "immoral" when she has a stone wall herself, surrounding her 20 million dollar winery/estate in the Napa Valley.

     

    Illusory perceptions. The democratic party, and the majority of Americans, are firmly behind "Chuck and Nan". There are no merits of a wall. Period. You simply cannot build a wall across the Rio Grande Valley. It is simply not possible. All you can do is build a tall fence across select areas. Pelosi is doing a superb job, of deflecting the hysterical, and fear mongering nonsense coming from Don. She outclasses him on every level, and is a rocket scientist, intellectually, in comparison to this man of very modest intelligence. I do agree the left leaning members of the party do not want a compromise. The hole that Trump has dug for himself is getting deeper by the day. Some are enjoying watching a hate monger suffer. I myself, am enjoying the drama, known as the waning days of the lame duck term.

     

    20180721_LDD002_0.jpg

  5. There is little doubt, that the true number goes well beyond ten, for the forsaken island of Dark Tao. There is a serial killer on the loose. And he and his family are above the law. And and all laws, including the hapless army. Having been there a dozen times over the years (mostly for very, very low quality diving, while I was learning) I will never go back, and recommend all those with an open mind, and a concern for their well being and safety, to avoid the island. Besides, it is way overpriced. 

  6. 15 hours ago, xylophone said:

    Let's just say that they "wouldn't"....... in fact when they found out how much the BIB were being paid in terms of brown envelopes etc, they wanted a piece of the action and there was a fair amount of bad feeling between the two for some time, before it was resolved.

     

    And just to show you how it was resolved...........a friend who with others owns a very high profile disco/nightclub here, which often stays open till 5 AM or 6 AM, and pays a large sum every month to the BIB in order to do so, was fearing that when the army took control, he would lose the ability to stay open that late and they would close him down, to all intents and purposes.

     

    Imagine his surprise and delight when the army "came knocking" and just wanted a share of the action, so he ended up putting them on the payroll, so to speak.

     

    Quite obvious that the army is just as corrupt as other institutions here, after all it is just about genetic in this country.

     

    And hence the utter and complete desperation to cling to power as long as they have. Fortunes have been made. 

  7. On 1/17/2019 at 3:15 PM, NamKangMan said:

     

    Ahhh, the old comparing prices on Phuket to the west argument again.  You do know the the minimum wage here is 300 baht.  Right?

     

    I think you have answered your own question.

     

    "Do you consider an hour plus journey in a cab to or from the airport not worth 700 baht?" - I think the journey from the airport is reasonable. 

     

    So, accepting the "reasonable" cost of 700 baht for "an hour plus journey in a cab" as a bench mark, do you then think just to get in the back of a tuk-tuk being minimum 200 baht to be "reasonable?"  

     

    Using your 700 baht bench mark, do you think 400 baht from Kata to Patong in a tuk-tuk to be "reasonable?" 

     

    What about after midnight when the same journey back to Kata doubles to 800 baht?  Do you think that is a "reasonable" price, when compared to your "hour plus journey in a cab?"

     

    It must be noted, tuk-tuks do not have air conditioning and seat belts, "cabs" do.

     

    Most tourists have no problem with the airport journey cost, because they only use this transport twice on their holiday. 

     

    Many tourists will require more frequent, but shorter distance land transport. on their holiday.  Many regularly go from their hotel to the beach, also to the market, also to shopping, also to activities, also to shows, also to tourists attractions, also to the nightlife etc.  Their tuk-tuk travel can run into thousands of baht a day, given you pay, or you walk, or you hire a vehicle. 

     

    I remember a thread a long time ago where a member posted a photo of his air ticket from Phuket to Bangkok, and it was cheaper than land transport to the airport.  Just saying.  This has been common knowledge for some time.

     

    Yes, it is fair to say I have "extreme bias against the sector."  I freely admit I am the most vocal on this forum about land transport on the island, but particularly the tuk-tuk mafia. 

     

    See all those coach buses, with the majority of tourists to Phuket inside them, on the roads here now?  Why do you think that is?

     

    See the terrible traffic here now? 

     

    Have you read the headlines that Phuket is the worst Province in Thailand for road death, thus making Phuket one of the most dangerous places in the world to be on the road? 

     

    Have you seen the parking issues here now?

     

    Remember the regular headlines of tuk-tuk drivers assaulting passengers? 

     

    Have you been to Bangkok?  Why do you think Phuket doesn't have proper metered taxis like Bangkok?

     

    Have you been to Pattaya?  Why do you think Phuket doesn't have baht buses? 

     

    Land transport, an essential service, is controlled by criminals on Phuket, and I do not apologize for having "extreme bias" against criminals, who, in my opinion, are indirectly responsible for many deaths and serious injuries here, and who have forced the change of tourist demographic on Phuket.

     

    Agreed. No justification whatsoever for Phuket or Samui taxi prices. None. Apologists will disagree. So will the taxi mafia. It comes down to sloth. More and more sloth on the part of Prayuth and the incompetent army. Also massive corruption. 

     

    Bottom line is the Samui and Phuket taxi mafia is far more powerful than the army. Seems to be a fact. Funny, but true. And very sad. The elections could not come soon enough!

  8. On 1/21/2019 at 8:56 AM, madmen said:
    On 1/21/2019 at 8:49 AM, Olmate said:
    Well “travellers you know”. That’s real confirmation then! emoji2961.png

    You want names, addresses, blood type.? Or you just can't pathom I have non expat friends that used to spend annual vacations in phuket.

    Me too. Some would spend $75,000 on a ten day vacation. I have some super wealthy friends and they took two vacations a year at $50-80k per trip for two weeks with the family. They don't come anymore. 

     

    Just ignore the trolls. 

  9. If you have a certain degree of success, and a career, why on earth would you want to look after your kids for any 24 hour period? I just looked after my 10 month old niece (my wife, and her sister did all the work) in our home for the past two weeks. Even though she is an angelic kid, she is still a 10 month old. Non stop activity. Call her typhoon Lek. I get it. Not something one chooses to do, if you have a choice.

     

    Kudos to him for not being cowed into submission. And sounds like he has had a colorful past. Good on him. Being with hundreds of women is nothing to be ashamed about, despite protestations to the contrary by the emasculators. 

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.