Jump to content

arthurboy

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    912
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by arthurboy

  1. ubonjoe

     

    Joe, I now am going to Savannakhet to apply for a multiple entry because my circumstances have changed.

     

    I have both forms for the Visa Application for the Thai Consulate and for my Laos Visa On Arrival and see that I have to provide details of 1) a Laos based guarantor for the Thai consulate and 2) Laos based contact person for the visa on entry.

     

    As I don't know anyone in Laos, what do I do about this?

     

    Can I also use my wife's name as guarantor in Thailand for the consulate visa application?

     

    Thanks in advance.

     

     

  2. homemade514 Thank you for your kind advice and solid information. Needless to say, I now have some breathing space to get things in order. 

     

    For general information for anyone in this situation, https://www.immigration.go.th/content/service_24 lays out the documentation required to get an extension, but omits the need for the following: 1) photos 2) "renting a house/ apartment you will need the contract and 3) id/tabien baan of the house/ apartment owner."

     

    Based on advice from people here, it's undoubtedly a good idea to take these documents as well.

  3. Thank you for your replies, overherebc and ubonjoe

     

    I didn't realise I could get a 60 day extension on my current extension, and therefore not have to leave Thailand (for now). Again, sorry to be a pain, but what are the document requirements and procedure for this? Would they want proof of financial status for a 60 day extension?

     

    I'm currently in BKK so would visit IMM at Chaengwattana.

     

    Thank you.

     

     

  4. I have a non-imm O extension of stay (multiple re-entry) based on marriage, obtained at Chaengwattana last year. We also have a son and my name is on the Thai birth certificate as his father. We have all the legally required documents.

     

    I've been working in Thailand for a number of years and, during that time, have had a variety of work sponsored non-imm extensions of stays, WP's etc., all legal and above board. I've never done a border run.

     

    My current extension is due to expire on 11 February 2019. After retiring last year, unfortunately, it looks likes I'm not going to make the financial requirements this time round and am not prepared to use an agent to fix this for me. I have an pension income from the UK, but it's been less than 40K a month for a long time, and I don't have 400K in my Thai bank account. 

     

    In short, should I/can I go with my family to Savannakhet, Laos just before my current extension expires and apply for a 90 day single entry based on marriage or parenthood, and without having to verify my financial status? Once back in Thailand, do I then continue to apply for 60 day extensions to visit (stay with) my family? If so, does that mean I then keep renewing the 60 day extension for a fixed period of time, say one year?

     

    Long term, once my financial situation settles down, I plan to switch "back" to a one year extension of stay, based on marriage or parenthood, from within Thailand.

     

    My apologies if my request seems a repeat of all you have dealt with before on here, but I know you guys have spent a lot of time answering questions like this, so your time and expertise are really appreciated.

     

    If I've missed out a information, please don't hesitate to ask.

     

    Thank you, and regards.

  5. ....... " Mr. Jiradet is a former advisor to Kittiratt Na-Ranong, ex-finance minister" .....

    Another politically motivated prosecution proving the junta's lack of impartiality, or just another rat caught out?

    just another rat caught out?thumbsup.gif

    Tis interesting though that - as yet - no Dems or big name yellow shirt affiliates have been investigated for any wrongdoing anywhere.

    I imagine that's because they are all good people...

  6. People that bought 'shares' in the KCCU were told by the court on Friday that they will not get their money back. It looks like the people have been conned by a classic Ponzi scam.

    The court also said that if cash was deposited, then there's a chance of restitution - assuming that sufficient actual money is returned by Supachai et al.

    KCCU is also now asking for investors to start depositing money again. Er...no thanks.

    • Like 2
  7. Does anyone know if the farmers are contracted to grow produce for the big agribusinesses such as CP? Do the farmers sell to middle men or privately at local markets etc.?

    I don't know where you are going with this, but I suspect it is similar to the statement of a government official last week. She blamed the people who wanted to eat fresh produce for the problems with burning.

    I wonder how many farmers are contracted to grow for CP et al and therefore how the haze problem squares with these company's stated corporate social responsibility.

    I suspect it doesn't.

×
×
  • Create New...