bubblegum

Yes you believe everything.

To the above: You're missing the point!

Here he goes again. Travel ban for Myanmar and other nations. Why? Because an Egyptian threw a Molotov cocktail  at those Jewish people in Boulder. Egypt is NOT on the list of banned nations. There is something in this dudes brain that does not connect.

no

1 hour ago, Cameroni said:

 

Lol, a 2 year old can see what Wilders stands for: hatred. The Theo van Gogh/Julius Streicher kind of hatred. But not righteous, justified hatred. Hatred of a religion, no less. How idiotic do you have to be to hate a religion?:

 

But of course Wilders only hates Islam because he's too cowardly to say what he really hates, Arabs and Moroccans.. Because it's not politically acceptable he cloaks his hatred in the more pretentious hatred of religion. Never mind that the largest Muslim contingent in Holland, the Indonesians, have been living in harmony with the dutch for eight decades

 

And he has the gall to invoke "Humanism" and "Christianity". Erasmus and Jesus would turn in their grave if they could see this obese Marilyn Monroe wannabe vomiting his hate, this great defender of humanism and Christianity,lol..

 

He's a fraud. He pretends to hate religion, but he has no clue about Islam. He pretends to hate Islam, when he really hates Moroccans and Arabs. Even his hair is a fraud.

 

Like Ayaan Hirsi Ali, his friend with no benefits, Wilders stands for fraud. His party has been in power for a while. What did he accomplish? Less arabs? Less Moroccans? No. He's all blah, blah, blah.

 

Trump deported more migrants in 2 months than Wilders' party did in almost 2 years.

 

He also stands for bending the knee before Israel which he dearly "loves" to this day.  And he stands for arrest without trial, which he saw in Israel and also quite likes. Good luck Holland.

 

As I said you talk BS. 

@Cameroni reading thing on the internet does not mean understanding it. You act like Mr. know it all but you have absolutely no idea what Wilders stands for.

Is this Jaxx guy still in school? If so he's failing on all fronts.

They should put Gomer in charge, he's good at doing nothing.

40 minutes ago, JaxxBKK said:

 

The claims are only allegations that have been made public. Trump alluded to much if it weeks ago.

 

The claims are all over the internet if you choose to actually look for it. It will all come out in week. These are issues that will come before congressional committees and therefore many of the details might not be made public until then.

 

The only contentious point that I had made above is the quid pro quo for money. The rest pretty much understood as fact now

 

Something else that should not be overlooked about the auto-pen. The only document that Joe Biden signed during his time in office was the one in which he withdrew from the presidential race as Dem candidate. Every other document was auto-penned.

 

 

 

Another truth bomb that is yet to come out on the forum is that Biden staffers were basically running the country for the past 4 years. Biden was absent of mind the entire time.

Its about Biden, not Trump. Pardons for money lol Who would do that.

Just now, JonnyF said:

 

I'm not the one craving attention by prancing down the street half naked screeching about my sexuality.

 

LOOK AT.......... MEEEEEEEEEEE.  😆

 

 

 

 

Yes you stay in the closet.

On 6/2/2025 at 2:15 AM, Nick Carter icp said:

The rioters just like to riot and break things and burn things .

No cause, apart from their own enjoyment .

Anarchists bringing anarchy to the streets .

Looters wanting clothes and televisions .

Nothing to do with the football game 

Spot on.

Even MTG has regrets, she did not read it.

She got sneered by on of the Dems saying "You got ONE job" 

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

No thanks.

 

You crack on though (but there's no need to expose yourself in the process). 

Poor insecure boy.

41 minutes ago, JimHuaHin said:

If you are not an American, and you hate Trump, how can you be a traitor?

My point, thanks beating me to it lol.

Lucky you lot living in Thailand it is pride month/week so let's celebrate. Oh wait lots of you Trumpers don't actually live here. 

2 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

 

Don't worry, she came back. She was here a few days ago.

Nice to see you've got some money.

More likely he does not want to be assassinated by Miller.

On 6/1/2025 at 10:54 AM, Cameroni said:

Can you imagine what would have happened if, say, Trump had been photographed doing that to his wife?

 

Or Boris Johnson face palming his wife?

 

World outrage.

 

But Macron gets a face palm and everyone nervously laughs it off. Totally normal if your wife is 25 years older.

 

I am telling you those two, there is something very not normal about them.

Jeez you are really starting to piss me off with all your relationship advices while yo are still crying about your Thai whore who left you. I asked before: How old are you, 22 ?

1 hour ago, jas007 said:

You want to come across as someone who understands diplomacy, enforceability, and so on, but your response here demonstrates that you understand none of that or how things play out in the real world.  

 

First, you should understand how diplomacy typically operates when the issues include ending a war, and why the enforcement of any such agreement might well be problematic but not out of the question.  

 

It's not at all unusual for states to withhold security guarantees from an agreement for very real strategic concerns. When push comes to shove, as the US has so often demonstrated, countries will act in their own best interest.  Guarantees don't mean much these days. Do you understand game theory? Have you ever heard of the prisoner's dilemma? Do you understand why the focus on Putin is a straw man argument and why that misses the point, in any event?

 

Ideally, guarantees operate as a deterrent because an aggressor would be unable to absolutely veto the guarantors from making good on their guarantees. The rational actor would therefore avoid the conflict.  But, as you've so aptly noted, enforcement would not come without roadblocks. In the case of a referral to the Security Council, by Putin himself or his representative at the UN. However, the UN is but one of several available enforcement mechanisms.  Moreover, the "loaded gun" analogy misses the mark. You're setting up an either/or situation that doesn't exist in the real world.  

 

Reciprocity and trust?  You must be kidding.  Look at the history of the conflict. Neither side can trust the other, and for good reasons.  Russia can't trust Ukraine, given its recent history of supposed violations of the Minsk Accords. And Ukraine certainly doesn't trust Russia. A Russia that continues to hold what Zelensky calls Ukrainian territory and an Ukraine that enters into a deal under duress?  In other words, it's a recipe for future trouble and that's not the goal of any agreement to end the war, is it?  

 

So, was there a genuine offer? Of course. Jut not an offer you like.  And I'm sure the offer may still be on the table, in spite of yesterday's drone strikes. 

 

 

Wow and you get all this info straight from... huuuhhh?

31 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

Is Harrisfan young?

Yes and chubby