Jump to content

Shaunduhpostman

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,034
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Shaunduhpostman

  1. 19 minutes ago, pollyog said:

    Having just scoured many Thai government websites etc it would appear that an NonO and a NonO-A visa are the same thing if either has been subsequently used to obtain an extension of stay, so all of us long-term farangs must have the health cover for our next renewal as far as I can tell.  

    I have the same worry, that there will be some kind of conflation of the two visa types, though I don' think it would happen via the way you are suggesting. The ask for proof of insurance would be happening at the embassies issuing visas and I can't imagine that the embassies would have info from immigration about whether we have used a plain O visa to get an extension of stay. Typically, Thai govt branches don't cooperate much. What seems strange to me is that they don't just ask all long term stayers to get insurance, why the focus on retirees? Seems there would be more money in charging for insurance from people below 50. My guess is that very soon, without missing a beat, they'll just throw the non-O long termers in with the retirees. I suppose it is better to just put all this on the back burner till we get reports back of what is happening to people when applying at embassies. Not too nice to have to go all the way to some embassy not knowing anymore what will be required, but rather Thailand in modus operandi as usual.

    • Like 2
  2. Looks like marriage visa applicants will skate by for now, I see that an O-A visa is a retirement visa and an O visa is a marriage visa. If Ubon Joe or anyone can confirm that O visa holders will not have to worry about the insurance requirement.

     

    I'm all for being repsonsible and having the ability to cover, but of course the main problem is grappling with  deliberately unclear rules and other rules set to benefit the insurance companies and stiff people out of their money and the disconnects between immigration and embassies issuing visas,  and the inevitable bunglings because its new rules and procedures and oh sorry sir have to go back your country its the mistake. Or going to the bank to get the policy and "Sorry no have."

  3. Agreed that it's probably just part of their job to check things, but I have been wondering about the IO's  on the way out since one guy back in September at Don Muang questioned me about what I was doing in leaving the country every 3 months on a multi non-O and coming back as opposed to what he seemed to feel I should be doing, renewing my stay at internal immigration.

     

    When I handed the officer my passport, he rifled through my passport impatiently back and forth shaking his head. "Many, many visa....Why you don't do in Thailand?" Rather than complain about the state of things regarding immigration too much I mentioned the main reason I do that is that for Kalasin you must go all the way to Nakorn Phanom immigration, much closer Khon Kaen does not handle our area, its closer to go to Laos and I said also its very clear what I should do also if I want to continue my stay in Thailand by leaving every 3 months on a multi non-o. I did not want to drone on and on about their own lengthy list of requirements which are ridiculous, mainly that even if i did go through the gauntlet at Nakorn Phanom I would still be faced with having to travel up to Nakorn Phanom to file the 90 day reporting which makes the whole rigamarole of an internal renewal stamp completely pointless. The officer was polite enough about it but still didn't seem to get it or believe me that Nakorn Phanom is actually further and with no direct transpo service from Roi Et whereas to Mukdahan/Laos transpo exists in my area and he laughed and said, "OK, you can do, but why go out all the time, no need, no need!  Go to Laos too far, go to Cambodia very far away." He stamped me out but then asked my wife about it as well.

     

    The guy was reasonable about it enough, but just the fact that he is questioning me about what he admitted himself is allowed by immigration as though it were odd and almost not acceptable makes me uncomfortable.

  4.  

    23 minutes ago, Briggsy said:

    That is arrest. The OP was just denied entry. I am confident his personal items were not taken. (He was online!) He was just not allowed to pass Immigration and would have had his passport temporarily taken away.

     

    It is all in Thai. So only Thais and Laos can read it.

    Yes, but, that was my point that it will potentially cause the guy problems at friendlier Thai land border crossings. Agreed it won't effect going to other countries.

    • Like 1
  5. On 10/16/2018 at 9:28 AM, Dumbastheycome said:

    Not sure if this topic is still alive but I  came across an item that contains some very interesting information.

    Seems  like it  is not only the consumers  are being rorted by the applied assumption that wine is an eliteist beverage  that the rich can pay for. 

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/marlborough-express/business/rural/7265344/Making-quality-wine-in-tropics

     

     

    Haven't heard of Gran Monte wine, if indeed that is the name of the wine this family produces. Anyone know the name of the wines they make, would be interested to try them.

  6. I think I am developing a new pet peeve

    13 minutes ago, xylophone said:

    Just ad a closer look at these Shaun and I was right...………..their wines priced at around 399 baht pb have fruit juice added and it states that on the back label, whereas those priced around 600 baht and up do not, and different description on the back label.

     

    Cunning stunt if you ask me!!!!!!

    Ugh...I think I can safely say that at this point I have developed a new pet peeve: fruit wines mixed with grape. In a few weeks tho' I'l be in Bangkok before going to Indonesia for my annual break from Thailand. I am looking forward to getting a few bottles of good value real wine to enjoy in my hotel room. Can you recommend good shops for wine in Bangkok? I have always gone to Villa but seeing as you are so keen on wine you might have some better suggestions, especially with regard to sales or better prices and/or selection in general.

  7. 4 hours ago, CanuckThai said:

    I was at an Italian restaurant for lunch in Khao Yai last week, 300 baht (plus tax and 10% grat surcharge) for a glass of generic red house wine (fruit or grape who knows)....

    300 for a glass, yes, I believe it. Sorry to say that but thats what things have come to. But I was referring to  .75 liter bottles of "Rolling" at 300 baht as too good to be true.

  8. 3 hours ago, xylophone said:

    They have a range of wines...…...some are real wine and the cheaper ones here are mixed with fruit juice.

     

    Really doesn't matter though, if you like it.

     

    Charles Strong is also a fruit wine and I have tasted it and it is ok. Seen it for 299 baht in Tesco Lotus

    Yes, I was able to find the Charles Strong bottle I had and check it, you're right. Perhaps you're right about Rolling as well. I definitely thought, this is too good too cheap to be right. Though they don't exactly talk up the fact that some of their wines are actually mixed pseudo-grape wines, it doesn't seem likely you can get real wine for 300 baht in Thailand or some god forsaken place like Roi Et. So many of the fruit wines had this almost standard looking indicator on the lower right corners of labels, so I was looking for that, not finding it and thinking I had real wine. Now I see that we have to read the entirety of the fine print to find whether a wine is grape wine or not. What a life in 2018. Dionysus/Bacchus  probably has a special place in hell for people like me who don't take drinking seriously enough to read the fine print and then drink fake grape wine. Haha...

  9. Rolling appears to be a legit wine, as in made with grape juice. Given the list prices listed on this site, 300 baht is a great deal. Makro was also selling Hoegaarden wheat beer  for 250 (Now back up at 280, still cheaper than most places) for a large bottle which is also 80 baht cheaper than everywhere else. :

     

    https://www.cumuluswines.com.au/range/rolling/

     

    I'm not sure Rolling would be getting any attention from what appear to be serious wine reveiwers if they were an imitation wine:

     

    http://australianwinejournal.blogspot.com/2010/05/rolling-shiraz-2008.html

  10. 2 minutes ago, xylophone said:

    I think that's "Rolling" or "Chasing Clouds" and I believe it is wine mixed with fruit juice...…..stated on the back label on the top with wine description.

    Yep, Rolling...thanks. Pretty sure its real wine tho, maybe I'm mistaken. I just checked to see if I couldn't find the empties and double check, but haven't bought the stuff in two weeks so no empties around anymore.

     

    Makro has another cheapish one called Charles Strong that tastes better to me, but I think its back up around the 400 mark, 399, actually I think. 

  11. Makro Roi Et has the best deal I've seen in Thailand on regular non-fruit juice wine. 70 baht cheaper than World Wines was, no longer being sold by TESCO. 300 baht for 75 cl's or either a generic red or white from Australia, don't remember the name its got an 18th century looking painting of a lady riding a bicycle. Slightly strange taste, tolerable, as though there's been vitamin tablets added to the wine, goes away after the first glass. I'm happy with it, but as seemingly all things I find in supermarkets here that I really like they end up being a one off and are never sold by the supermarket again. I have a theory that if things sell too well they won't re-order because its too much of a pain to keep re-ordering.

  12. I too have had the problem twice at Don Meuang, not at Suvarbhumi or Laos border. It is a practice I have long kept, to check the stamp immeditaely afterwards. What I wonder is why is it suddenly an issue, never had the problem before. You don't want to be asking immigration to do anything for you either, they might have a bad reaction to your asking to have the 30 day entry changed to 90 days. Some officers get upset if you hand them your passport open to your data page, so you are already treading on eggshells.

     

    Good suggestion by Overherebc that you mention you'd like 90 days as you hand them your passport, perhaps that will help solve the problem. It seems it is a thing in Thailand that people run around assuming what it is you want or that what you want is not important at all, so best to mention you want 90 days from the get go.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
  13. I wonder what they mean by street fighting. Fighting in the street? Really? Who would do that?  You'd get run over by a car before you got into much fighting in the street.

     

    If there were sidewalks in most places then ok, sidewalk fighting, but is that relevant, theres no scope for that kind of thing usually.

     

     Or how about a fight in a parking lot, is that a street fight? Or out of sight in a parking garage? 

     

     

    • Sad 1
  14. 4 minutes ago, darrendsd said:

    They don't offend me, they are just rubbish

     

    "Tourism is not that important to the economy period"

     

    Really??

     

    The 2014 total is estimated to have accounted for 19.3 percent (2.3 trillion baht) of Thailand's GDP

     

    And that was 4 years ago, just a quick search will probably reveal it is more now, i'm sure I read a while ago  it is around 22-25 % now

     

    If you really think that tourism is not important to Thailand and that Thailand can afford to lose 20-25 % of it's GDP you must live on another planet, no country in the world can afford to lose 20-25 % of it's GDP no matter where it comes from

     

    Tourism IS important to Thailand, very important, the % it generates of it's GDP prove this

     

     

    Those figures seem to me to be a bit on the higher side compared to what I have seen, where are they from? At any rate there is such a variation in how much it accounts for the economy I'm not sure it matters. If they are actually as high as you say here then OK I'll give you that that it is important to theh economy. Seems to me I have seen it as 8-13% at best from non-Thai sources. Thats what I based my remark on. I don't think you can go by what the TAT says or other government entities, obviously they may have a stake in the figures being as high as possible.

     

    Thanks all the same then Darren. I appreciate this kind of reply as opposed to your initial one.

     

     

  15. 49 minutes ago, lkv said:

    It is important, about 13% of the GDP. Numbers go down, the people on top get sleepless nights. Seriously.

     

    True, but they only liked our money anyways. Most of the smiles are not real. This is not new. But there is an anti foreigner vibe coming from the current administration. All people read in the newspapers every week or see on Thai TV nowadays are negative examples of arrests, raids, crimes and so on.

     

    They want tourists, but obviously the more money they have the better. See the TAT commercials for the luxury HK market, Elite visas and so on.

    I agree with all of your comments. If I am not mistaken 13% is at the upper end of the estimates I seem to have re-called seeing. 

     

     

  16. 34 minutes ago, darrendsd said:

    Apart from your first paragraph probably the biggest load of rubbish I have read on this forum and considering the amount there is that is saying something

    No it isn't  saying anything other than you don't like what I and many others have to say on TV. Who cares, Darren. Who cares what is rubbish to you and what isn't. If you have a different perspective on topic  then by all means share it, that is what a good post is about not simply lashing out at people's opinions that personally offend you or what ever the problem is.

  17. Just sayin, but Penang has never been a good place to get a visa. I nearly didn't get my visa for work back in the 90's there.

     

    Another thing is that trying to go by the book and do things in the most secure way weirdly backfires in Thailand. Thais fly by the seat of their pants without complaint, so they probably don't get why anyone would go to the trouble of getting a visa, probably looks suspect to them like you are looking to be putting on airs once you arrive, flashing your tourist visa in the halls of influence and what not, which is ironic since they are the ones offering a visa, so why would they offer something that only dodgy people will take. And like others have noted, they can just as easily deny you entry if you have a visa as they can with the visa exempt stamp.

     

    They don't want to give tourist visas any more either, for the most part. One month is all they want to allow with the visa exempt stamp, and its been that way for about 6-7 years. You can also convert a tourist visa into a non-B, so there is probably some irrational assumptions that you are coming to Thailand to try and work, god forbid. Again, its their rule that you have to have the tourist visa, yet if you play by that rule its like, "Ah ha! Gotchya! You dirty rat!" 

     

    Tourism is not that important to the economy period. We can get stuffed and to be fair the amount of stress we cause the locals just by being here, most of them in Bangkok and Pattaya anyway despise us, you have to wonder if the benefit they get is worth it. BAngkok Thais for sure mostly would rather never see another foreigner as long as they live. Though I often fantasize about Thailand just trying it on, just walling the country off and see how they like it. They should do it I think. No tourists, no foreigners here at all except very high level business and diplomatic people, the rest of you out! Thats what the people with power and influence want they should just do it. 

     

    • Sad 1
  18. The wine to be had in Laos of course is without the tax we have here. It may get down to that, more excursions to Laos just to spend a weekend drinking nice wine.

     

    There's a shop in the old downtown Savanakhet area that has a good selection of wines from most of the world's wine producers tho with an emphasis on French wines. I do enjoy that aspect of my yearly non-O run, getting a nice bottle for about half of what it would be here and enjoying it by the Mekong.

×
×
  • Create New...