Top U.S. general urges Google to work with military

[webfact]

Top U.S. general urges Google to work with military

 

U.S. Joint Chiefs Chairman General Joseph Dunford attends a meeting of the National Space Council in the East Room of the White House in Washington, U.S., June 18, 2018. REUTERS/Leah Millis

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The top U.S. general said on Thursday that it was "inexplicable" that technology giants like Alphabet Inc's Google <GOOGL.O> did not want to work with the Pentagon even as they seek out business with China, where companies have less freedom than in the United States.

 

"We are the good guys and it's inexplicable to me that we would make compromises in order to advance our business interests in China where we know that freedoms are restrained, where we know that China will take intellectual property from companies," Marine General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said during an event.

 

A Google spokeswoman for China issues did not immediately respond to a request to comment. Google Chief Executive Sundar Pichai has previously said the company has invested in China for years and plans to continue to do so, but that the company also was continuing to work with the U.S. government on projects in health care, cybersecurity and other fields.

 

Earlier this year Google said it was no longer vying for a $10 billion cloud computing contract with the U.S. Defense Department, in part because the company’s new ethical guidelines do not align with the project.

 

In June, Google said it would not renew a contract to help the U.S. military analyse aerial drone imagery when it expires, as the company sought to defuse internal uproar over the deal.

 

The defence program, called Project Maven, set off a revolt inside Google, as factions of employees opposed Google technology being used in warfare.

 

At the same time, Google is developing a censored search engine for Chinese users, which it says is experimental and not close to launching.

 

Google has long sought to have a bigger presence in China, the world’s largest internet market. It needs government approval to compete with the country’s dominant homegrown internet services.

 

Current and former employees, human rights activists and U.S. lawmakers have criticized Google for not taking a harder line against the Chinese government’s policy that politically sensitive results be blocked.

 

"I'm not sure that people at Google will enjoy a world order that is informed by the norms and standards of Russia or China," Dunford said, without mentioning any other tech companies by name during his remarks.

 

(Reporting by Idrees Ali and Phil Stewart; Additional reporting by Paresh Dave in San Francisco; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

 

-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-12-07

[IAMHERE]

Perhaps the chinese will make a deal with the US military to give some of that Google technology to the Pentagon.

[Burma Bill]

Not only the Chinese but how about the US Military itself -  disturbing "intelligence gathering"

[fullcave]

3 hours ago, Burma Bill said:

Not only the Chinese but how about the US Military itself -  disturbing "intelligence gathering"

Exactly, it's that do as I say not as I do mentally. 

[timendres]

14 hours ago, webfact said:

At the same time, Google is developing a censored search engine for Chinese users, which it says is experimental and not close to launching.

 

Google has long sought to have a bigger presence in China, the world’s largest internet market. It needs government approval to compete with the country’s dominant homegrown internet services.

As a Chinese Internet user, why would I use Google over one of the "homegrown" services? Because I would want uncensored results. Thus, it seems Google's approach is self-defeating and pointless.

[OneMoreFarang]

Should we believe that the NSA does not have access to all Google data? 555

[bristolboy]

1 hour ago, timendres said:

As a Chinese Internet user, why would I use Google over one of the "homegrown" services? Because I would want uncensored results. Thus, it seems Google's approach is self-defeating and pointless.

I'm not defending Google but search engines aren't only or even primarily used for taboo subjects. So Google could still be superior in finding relevant information.

Edited December 7, 2018 by bristolboy