Jump to content

PM Yingluck says losing 37 year Don Mueang constituency 'not a big loss'


Recommended Posts

Posted

I can only assume that Thaksin told her to play this down. Actually, I'm convinced that he probably tells her what to wear and eat, as well.

I can believe that Yingluck is likely too dense to understand that it's probably very significant, by-election or not, but Thaksin must realize that when you dominate a constituency for 37 years and then lose it, a message is clearly being sent. Perhaps the populist actions (rice scam, automobile tax credits, etc,) hasn't benefited people in that riding very much, and they're starting to see just how harmful these programs will be to Thailand in the long run.

Once again, the stuff that Thai politicians say amazes me. They're <deleted>' shameless!!!

The more I see and hear from her the more convinced I am that she's not even capable of being a puppet

She must be good at something. ..........................Surely?

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Doesn't the plastic Barbie puppet not realise that both sides had the same time to prepare?

Am I right in thinking that they lost 2 seats here?

Maybe the people of DM now know their worth to the PTP

Posted

Don Meung is one electorate. Is there not a few more? 500 seats in total? A few baht per vote and the plastic doll is back.

Posted

Don Meung is one electorate. Is there not a few more? 500 seats in total? A few baht per vote and the plastic doll is back.

Aye - but he resigned his boy-band party-list seat to compete right?

Posted

Don Meung is one electorate. Is there not a few more? 500 seats in total? A few baht per vote and the plastic doll is back.

Aye - but he resigned his boy-band party-list seat to compete right?

So Pheu Thai party lost only the Constituency MP seat, the party list seat was filled by the next on the party list registered for the July 2011 general elections. Not sure if this is the first MP seat the Pheu Thai party really lost.

Posted

Don Meung is one electorate. Is there not a few more? 500 seats in total? A few baht per vote and the plastic doll is back.

A war is won with the success of many battles.

We didn't see K.Abhisit crowing about the victory.

One step at a time. Make no mistake, the PTP, whether they admit it or not, are definitely stunned by this loss, regardless of the dismissive comments of Ms Yingluck.

  • Like 1
Posted

So what happens to Sam now?

He resigned his party list seat to compete in a sure thing and lost.

The next one on the party list will have moved up and will now be an MP in his place.

That one whoever it is will not be happy if they are told, get back down the list again Sam wants his job back.

So will something else be found for him like the deputy associate minister of nothing much or are losers no longer welcome in PT.

Posted

So what happens to Sam now?

He resigned his party list seat to compete in a sure thing and lost.

The next one on the party list will have moved up and will now be an MP in his place.

That one whoever it is will not be happy if they are told, get back down the list again Sam wants his job back.

So will something else be found for him like the deputy associate minister of nothing much or are losers no longer welcome in PT.

I think you just found him his new position: Permanent Deputy Associate Minister of Nothing Much At All.

That should fit in nicely with all the others with similar titles.

Posted (edited)

whistling.gif A large portion of that constituency was floated back in 2011, and many of the people living there are still not happy about the government's response to either the floods or the compensation they (did not) receive afterwards.

I talked to a taxi driver about a year ago from that area.

His house was flooded for two weeks, the damage bill was about 30,000 Baht.

He was told he would be given compensation for his loss in the amount of 3500 Baht.

Almost a year layer, when I talked to him, he still had not actually received ANY compensation. .

I suspect he did NOT vote for the government candidate this time.

Apparently, others had the same idea.

Edited by IMA_FARANG
  • Like 2
Posted

She is bright enough to know that more than half the constituencies in the country are still easy to fool with populist policies, but if she thought her management of the flooding and first car scheme for urbanites was going to snatch more seats away from Dems she was wrong.

Posted

And the PTP government goes from strength to strength, under its new leader, at least according to her herself ? blink.png

Perhaps Big Sister or Big Brother believe it, but I'm afraid that I don't, and nor I suspect do her Cabinet colleagues who, as she was complaining only last week, are failing to support her properly. I wonder why ?

Time for a reshuffle, starting at the top ! rolleyes.gif

Posted

Let's remember that TRT have stayed unable to win the BKK governorship, and yet have swept national elections.

As PT is negotiating to purchase parts of BJT with groups like the Matchima faction (because the entire TRT/PPP/PT political movement is actually a series of purchased constituencies built around an empire of like minded regional godfathers who each own their own province, and the government PR budget is used to build a cult of personality around the Shinawatra family as the leader of the mighty beast in order to keep the godfather factions in check with enough crumbs thrown around to the provinces to make reelection cheap) keeping the usual gang of godfathers in power, it really doesn't matter if they lost every single seat in Bangkok as they can just replace them with a few more purchased provinces.

The tricky bit is dealing with unethical thugs with enormous egos, that bit takes both elegance and a strong arm. No wonder that Yaowapa and Chalerm are still remaining in positions of power. It's basic carrot and stick politics.

Many were picking a snap election later this year...right now it must be tempting to try to get a new mandate while they can.

This sums it up perfectly. For all those who preach that people are voting PTP as a rejection of the evil "elite" who are preventing the rural poor from progressing, wake up. The PTP are made up of the very people who are doing just such a thing. Ask yourselves, who do those in the Northeast consistantly vote for? Why did the TRT buy out the entire single biggest party at the time, the NAP, complete with all its corrupt baggage, rather than field fresh. local grassroot candidiates? In who's interest really is it to keep them at the same level of (un)education, voting unquestioningly for the same old rural godfathers? Unfortunately, as many urban voters come to realise how they've been lied to and ripped off by the PTP, there are still all too many turkeys willing to vote for Christmas.

  • Like 1
Posted

And the PTP government goes from strength to strength, under its new leader, at least according to her herself ? blink.png

Perhaps Big Sister or Big Brother believe it, but I'm afraid that I don't, and nor I suspect do her Cabinet colleagues who, as she was complaining only last week, are failing to support her properly. I wonder why ?

Time for a reshuffle, starting at the top ! rolleyes.gif

Does anybody in their wildest dreams imagine that the PTP MPs will have a meeting and vote whether to retain Yingluk or elect a new leader?

How is a government democratic when there is no democracy within the party forming government?

Posted

There are quite a few seats in the central area that PTP "won" by very small margins and far less than 50% of the vote. Yingluck would want to hope that there are no by-elections in those areas in the near future.

The PTP are going to lose a few seats in those areas when there is a general election. I don't think they're going to get the majority (of seats) that they did in the last election, so they're going to have to shell out a bit more to get the coalition together to be able to form government.

  • Like 2
Posted

There are quite a few seats in the central area that PTP "won" by very small margins and far less than 50% of the vote. Yingluck would want to hope that there are no by-elections in those areas in the near future.

The PTP are going to lose a few seats in those areas when there is a general election. I don't think they're going to get the majority (of seats) that they did in the last election, so they're going to have to shell out a bit more to get the coalition together to be able to form government.

And there lies the crux of the matter. They have spent two years robbing God knows how much money from the Thai people to be able to afford to pay whatever is needed to keep this gravy train rolling. Sad, worrying, but...true!

  • Like 1
Posted

Don't forget the floods of 2011. I was there when she was hit by plastic bottles from the crowd but on the news that night she was seen catching roses from the crowd. Her bodyguards had a lot of work to do that night.

Those people have not forgotten that episode NO WATER WILL FLOOD THIS AREA

Macanello

  • Like 1
Posted

What Yingluck meant to say was something like "All of us in PTP take the loss of this seat very seriously. We would like to assure all of the voters who supported our party and candidate in this by-election that we will work with them to try and ascertain the reasons why some voters felt they could not or did not want to vote for PTP. We value our loyal voters and aim to improve things so that we can regain the confidence of the majority of voters in this district as soon as possible".................but! ...she didn't! Quack quack oops!

That's what a real PM would have said.

Posted

What Yingluck meant to say was something like "All of us in PTP take the loss of this seat very seriously. We would like to assure all of the voters who supported our party and candidate in this by-election that we will work with them to try and ascertain the reasons why some voters felt they could not or did not want to vote for PTP. We value our loyal voters and aim to improve things so that we can regain the confidence of the majority of voters in this district as soon as possible".................but! ...she didn't! Quack quack oops!

That's what a real PM would have said.

Gizz a job ;)

  • Like 1
Posted

Hahahaha that's face saving if I ever saw one! You're fooling no one, dearie.

Unfortunately they continue to fool far too many people . . . fortunately, "some" are waking up and opening their eyes and seeing how much this Govt is costing them in terms of cash and reputation.

Posted

There are quite a few seats in the central area that PTP "won" by very small margins and far less than 50% of the vote. Yingluck would want to hope that there are no by-elections in those areas in the near future.

The PTP are going to lose a few seats in those areas when there is a general election. I don't think they're going to get the majority (of seats) that they did in the last election, so they're going to have to shell out a bit more to get the coalition together to be able to form government.

If there was a snap General Election right now, PTP would not be in power for very much longer. For now, they are hanging on as best they can and skimming as much as they can.

If there was a viable 3rd "party", I am sure they would get a lot of the votes. Anyone want to help set up the Thai Rak Farang party?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...