Jump to content

Drastic ideas from reformers on Thai charter


webfact

Recommended Posts

Drastic ideas from reformers on charter
The Nation

30250613-01_big.jpg

Parliament must choose pm, military must be politically neutral, LRCT says

BANGKOK: -- HAVING PARLIAMENT choose the prime minister, limiting martial law to absolute emergencies threatening the Kingdom's survival, prohibiting military courts from trying civilians, and downsizing the police force.


Those were some of the wide-ranging proposals for the new constitution Kanit Na Nakorn, chairman of the Law Reform Commission of Thailand (LRCT), made on behalf of the commission yesterday.

The LRCT proposals on how the next charter should look include a stipulation that the military maintain political neutrality and an increase in rights to defend the constitution.

The commission also said it should be stated that no one should drag the monarchy into politics.

More radical proposals include doing away with police ranking and separating some offices from police control as part of a reform that includes downsizing the force. The commission also urged improvement in the so-called independent organisations that play a scrutiny role.

The LRCT proposed that individuals sentenced by a court for corruption or homicide should not be granted a pardon.

It proposed that the results of referendums should be binding.

On rights and liberty, the LRCT suggested the charter drafters stick to what was written in the 2007 Constitution, while stressing the importance of maintaining the principle of the rule of law and making explicit the consequences to government of not adhering to that principle.

The LRCT is of the opinion that martial law should only be declared when the survival of the Kingdom is at stake, with a finite time frame and limited scope in terms of area.

On national reconciliation, it proposed that facts about the roots of political conflict be made into lessons on sustainable reconciliation. The so-called transitional justice concept should be applied, where amnesty is granted to those who did not commit a political crime, but not to those found guilty of harming or killing people during political upheaval.

As for the role of the cabinet after dissolution of the House of Representatives, the new charter should make it clear what can and cannot be done in order to avoid conflict of interest during election campaigns.

On decentralisation, the state should explicitly vow to push for all provinces eventually to become self-governing. Local administrative bodies should also be able to collect tax and a local citizen council established.

On the judicial system, the LRCT proposed that those who have been judged by the Supreme Court should have the right to appeal for a retrial.

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/politics/Drastic-ideas-from-reformers-on-charter-30250613.html

nationlogo.jpg
-- The Nation 2014-12-25

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is Kanit Na Nakorn?

Great ideas!

The Junta and PDRC (who have already brought the King into this) will likely string this guy up on a trumped up Lesse Mageste. Kanit Na Nakorn's proposal means no more Royal backing and thus blanket amnesties for Juntas.

Before martial law was declared, Gen Prayuth told me Khun Suthep and your masses of PDRC supporters are too exhausted. Its now the duty of the army to take over the task, Mr Suthep said.

Edited by Ve37
Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are definitely drastic ideas from an elitist perspective.

If the military is going to be truly restricted in application of martial law and discouraged from future overthrow of elected governments, the drafters should also consider constitutional provisions that any illegal amendments and/or abolishment of the constitution, including amnesties, shall not be respected by any subsequent provisional or contrived constitution without approval (80%?) by public referendum.

The drafters should also address any illegal directed changes in elected government officials that is outside the authority of the constitution (ie., removal directed by the NCPO), such as the forcible removal of any elected government official.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...