Jump to content

Proposal to trim Kaeng Krachan heritage bid


webfact

Recommended Posts

Proposal to trim Kaeng Krachan heritage bid
By Pratch Rujivanarom 
The Nation

 

f2d53e2502788432215350ce2a76e370.jpeg

Photo credit by Kaeng Krachan National Park /FB

 

PHETCHABURI: -- AN AREA OF Kaeng Krachan National Park in Phetchaburi that is being promoted for designation as a world heritage site may have to be reduced as neighbouring Myanmar maintains its strong stance in opposition to the United Nations recognition if a border dispute is not settled beforehand.

 

The National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department has stated that discussions with Myanmar on the border demarcation at the park are ongoing, but officials said they did not expect any progress soon, so the proposed area for designation could possibly be reduced to avoid conflict, officials said.


Thailand has discussed the boundary demarcation issue with Myanmar several times since the World Heritage Committee meeting at Istanbul in July, said Thanya Netithammakul, National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department director-general.

 

Full story: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/news/national/30300960

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2016-11-28
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are one or two civil rights cases involving Karen tribespeople who disappeared in Kaeng Krachan National Park that implicate a previous park director in serious human rights violations.  This would not be lost on the UNESCO committee reviewing   a proposal from Thailand for a new WHA.  There would be a serious risk that the Thai government would use a WHA designation as an excuse to forcibly remove Karen people living in the area to "preserve" the forests.  There are possibly other deeper darker secrets lurking near the Thai-Myanmar border.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The dispute with the land is practically cause the territory is not strictly demarcated by the countries. According to some sources, the percentage of the land is 34%, but the most recent updates taken from the interview with U Kyaw Zaw (article suggested by the term paper writer Paul Bradly to Huffington Post) showed 42% of the land belong to Myanmar. I wonder why they can't make it clear...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...