Jump to content
Forum upgrade in progress! ×

sambum

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    8,241
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Contact Methods

  • Line
    n/a
  • WhatsApp
    n/a

Recent Profile Visitors

10,306 profile views

sambum's Achievements

Platinum Member

Platinum Member (9/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Very Popular Rare
  • 5 Reactions Given
  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare

Recent Badges

6.9k

Reputation

  1. Erm? They haven't implemented it yet! :- "Thailand's Customs Department will start charging Value-Added Tax (VAT) on all imported postal goods next month."
  2. From a UK Parliament Hansard article regarding The Illegal Migration Bill - essentially not taking into account the legal migrants:- "The Illegal Migration Bill is critical to stopping the boats. ...........................The asylum system currently costs £3.6 billion a year and £6 million a day in hotel accommodation, but that is not the true cost of doing nothing. As this impact assessment shows, the cost of accommodating illegal migrants has increased dramatically since 2020. If these trends continued, the Home Office would be spending over £11 billion a year, or £32 million a day, on asylum support by the end of 2026. In such a scenario, the Bill would only need to deliver a 2% deterrence in arrivals to enable cost savings."
  3. I think you should have gone to Specsavers - "Dinsdale" made the point you are referring to - NOT ME!
  4. Then why are they coming to the UK in their boatloads for "a better way of life"? :- "Thousands of migrants rescued in Channel, crossings to UK at second-highest on record By Emma Wallis Published on : 2023/12/04 Latest update : 2023/12/05 Thousands of migrants have arrived in Britain after crossing the Channel in small boats in the last seven days. Over the weekend, French authorities also rescued over 200 migrants off the coast of Calais. Crossings have hit the second-highest level on record. Migrant crossings in the Channel over the last few days have increased once more. According to data from the British government, 1,264 migrants reached the English coast after crossing the Channel in small boats between November 26 and December 2."
  5. I think that "back then", in the days before the internet and "hand held computers", most pensioners would probably get their information "passed down" by the guy sitting at the next seat in the bar/working mans club! I can just see John Smith getting an envelope full of what he would consider "gobbledegook", showing it to a mate, and asking "What do you think this lot means?" And his mate replying, "Oh, nowt to worry about - it's just them telling you when your pension starts - everybody gets one of them!"
  6. In some parts, bikes have got to be parked closely together otherwise you wouldn't be able to get parked in the same town that you were visiting!
  7. "You could be making a turn, be delayed in clearing the opposite lane,....." If you were delayed in clearing the opposite lane, surely you shouldn't be turning anyway? The car is at fault for not indicating his intention to turn. If he had indicated, the motor bike rider may have slowed down, or at the least, have been aware of the car drivers intentions.
  8. Luxury car - no signal to indicate that he was turning. Motorbike appeared to be going fast, but the rider wasn't thrown very far, and didn't appear to be seriously injured. However, the thing that is apparent from the clip is that the couple seemed more concerned about their car than the motorcyclist! Didn't even give him a glance!
  9. I'm not saying that at all, (I did say it was a conspiracy theory!) but IF (and I stress the word IF) she was a bar girl who was bought out of a bar, the surely sexual favors were part of the deal, and if suddenly she reneged on the deal (possibly after she'd been paid, because some of these girls ask for money up front) then maybe the "punter" got aggrieved and wanted to get what he'd paid for? And "rape AND sexually assault"? She didn't claim rape - just sexual assault, which could mean a myriad of things), but to be honest, the reason why the police took the case so seriously, was because she mentioned there were firearms involved, and as it turns out they were correct. But let's test another conspiracy theory. As I said in one of my previous posts, if she was indeed his girlfriend, and he decided to call it a day, then as it says in the proverb, 'hell hath no fury like a woman scorned", so she decided to inflict some kind of revenge on him? However, there is also the strong possibility that he was guy who like bossing his girlfriend around - he had guns, a luxury BMW sedan, a Ducati motorcycle, and a pickup truck, so maybe she thought that she was entitled to a bit more than he was paying her, and he refused to pay any more? All of the above is pure conjecture, and it is only her word against his regarding the sexual assault, and if they were in a long term realtionship (boyfriend/girlfriend scenario) I tend to think that sex was part of the arrangement, but GUNS? Because he LIKES them? As well as a luxury car and luxury motor cycle and truck? A lethal combination in my opinion, and I am pleased that he has been caught, "grassed on" - whatever you care to call it, another piece of Russian garbage bites the dust, and the world is a better place for it!
  10. No,of course I don't, and if you agree with me you would realise that that's what I've been saying all along!
  11. Ridiculous! And worse so - the scenarios happening at the Niagara Falls!
×
×
  • Create New...