Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Afghan Asylum Seeker Jailed in UK for Rape of 12-Year-Old Girl

An Afghan asylum seeker has been sentenced to 16 years in prison in the United Kingdom after abducting and raping a 12-year-old girl.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, was convicted of rape, child abduction, sexual assault and recording an indecent video following a trial at Warwick Crown Court. He had earlier admitted a separate count of raping a child under 13.

Court convicts man of multiple offences

The crimes occurred in July last year in Nuneaton and later triggered protests in the town.

Judge Kristina Montgomery said the victim suffered serious psychological harm and ongoing trauma as a result of the attack. The girl had been left alone in a park in the dark after the assault, she said, and remained fearful her attacker might return.

Mulakhil was ordered to serve 15 years in custody followed by an additional year on licence.

Details of the attack presented at trial

Prosecutors said Mulakhil targeted the girl after encountering her earlier that day.

Security camera footage shown in court captured him asking the victim her age before the attack. She told him she was 19, which the judge described as clearly untrue.

Judge Montgomery told the court the jury had no doubt Mulakhil knew the girl was under 16.

During the 10-day trial, jurors heard evidence from the victim describing the assault and saying the attacker laughed during the incident.

The judge told Mulakhil his responsibility for the crime was at the highest level. She also noted that he had taken the girl to a secluded location before carrying out the assault, which increased the severity of the sentence.

Mulakhil arrived in Britain by small boat about four months before the offences.

Sentence and legal orders

Alongside the prison term, the court imposed an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order and a permanent restraining order preventing Mulakhil from contacting the victim.

The judge said the length of the sentence meets the threshold for deportation once he completes his prison term.

Additional concurrent sentences were issued for related offences, including four years for child abduction and two years for recording the indecent video.

Defence lawyer Marcus Harry told the court Mulakhil fled Afghanistan after coming under pressure from the Taliban. He said the defendant had intended to study economics at university.

Judge Montgomery said she considered Mulakhil’s age, lack of previous convictions and his guilty plea to one charge when determining the sentence.

Case sparks political debate

The case also prompted debate over how police disclose suspects’ nationality and immigration status.

Two men were initially charged over the incident. A second defendant, Mohammad Kabir, was acquitted of all charges during the trial.

The arrests led politicians including Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, to claim there had been a lack of transparency about the case.

Warwickshire Police said at the time that national guidelines did not require forces to disclose nationality or immigration status once suspects were formally charged.

Following the controversy, authorities encouraged police forces to consider releasing such information in high-profile investigations.

Detective Chief Inspector Collette O'Keefe, who led the investigation, said the crime represented a serious breach of community values.

She praised the victim for her courage in giving evidence, saying her testimony was crucial to securing the conviction.

O’Keefe added that no prison term could erase the trauma the girl suffered, but expressed hope the verdict would mark the start of her path toward a safer and brighter future.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 28 March 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

BeastOfBodmin Silver Member

BeastOfBodmin

Advanced Member

"The judge said the length of the sentence meets the threshold for deportation once he completes his prison term."

1tooth Silver Member

1tooth

Advanced Member

Interesting fact. 75% of pedopi1es are white men. Yes , you read that right. I'm not saying white men=pedophi1e? I'm not implying anything. Anyway, on a totally different topic, I've noticed a lot of white men traveling to Philippines and remote villages in Thailand.

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member

So why did the 12-year old tell the rapist she was 19? Was she Brit or immigrant?

It's not 70% who commit sexual assault are white Brits, it's 95%

SunnyinBangrak Ruby Member

SunnyinBangrak

Advanced Member
34 minutes ago, unblocktheplanet said:

So why did the 12-year old tell the rapist she was 19? Was she Brit or immigrant?

It's not 70% who commit sexual assault are white Brits, it's 95%

Sounds much like Brits haven't moved on from the glory days of teenage gang rape victims being told to "shut their mouths for the sake of diversity".

May I gently point out the muslim/immigrants from muslim countries communities are vastly over represented proportionally in rape stats even with the all hands on deck effort to cover it all up.

unblocktheplanet Diamond Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member

Good enough for you? I certainly don't condone rape at any age including a child who says she's 19. But to pin this on ethnicity is false. Rape is done by men of all nationalities. No means no.

https://www.dorset.police.uk/foi-ai/dorset-police/disclosure-logs/2025-disclosures/sexual-offences-by-nationality/

Sexual offences by nationality

Freedom of Information (FOI) Act request ref: 01/FIN/25/3692

Version Date: 02/10/2025

The Performance & Analysis Department have provided the following information: 

Data Source                                                

We have searched the Niche Crime database for Sexual Offences and extracted the named suspects and their nationalities, filtering out British nationals (England, Scotland, Wales, Jersey & Northern Island). 

I would like to request the following information for the period of 2024, and 1 January 2025 to 2 September 2025: The total number of recorded sexual offences in your police force area, for 2024 and 2025 (to September).

 

2024

(Jan – Dec)

2025

(Jan – Sept)

No. of recorded sexual offences

2261

1615

The number of recorded sexual offences where the alleged perpetrator was not a British national, for 2024 and 2025 (to September).

Please Note:

The table below is based on suspects not offenders

Additionally, the figures are for the number of offences and not the number of individuals – An individual may be the suspect for more than one offence 

 

2024

(Jan – Dec)

2025

(Jan – Sept)

No. of recorded sexual offences where the suspect was not a UK National

186

127

No. of recorded sexual offences where the suspect had dual nationality

18

9

 

 

If available, a breakdown of the alleged perpetrators by nationality, for 2024 and 2025 (to September). 

Suspect Nationality

2024

(Jan – Dec)

2025

(Jan – Sept)

Afghanistan

3

1

Albania

2

0

Algeria

0

1

Bangladesh

2

2

Belarus

0

1

Brazil

4

4

Bulgaria

4

3

Cameroon

1

1

Canada

2

0

China

0

2

Colombia

1

0

Czech Republic

1

2

Egypt

3

2

Ethiopia

0

1

Fiji

1

0

France

1

0

Gambia

2

0

Germany

1

0

Ghana

3

1

Guyana

1

0

India

16

17

Iran

9

5

Iraq

3

5

Ireland

1

0

Italy

2

0

Kenya

3

1

Korea (Republic Of)

1

0

Kosovo

2

0

Latvia

3

0

Libya

4

0

Lithuania

3

0

Malawi

1

0

Malaysia

0

1

Mauritius

0

1

Morocco

2

3

Namibia

2

0

New Zealand

1

0

Nigeria

14

7

North Macedonia

1

0

Other

6

7

Pakistan

3

2

Palestinian Territory

1

1

Philippines

4

2

Poland

14

10

Portugal

8

4

Romania

8

7

Russian Federation

1

0

Saudi Arabia

6

4

Slovakia

1

0

Somalia

1

1

South Africa

2

1

Spain

0

2

Sri Lanka

5

2

Sudan

1

2

Syria

5

4

Thailand

1

0

Timor-Leste

1

0

Trinidad and Tobago

4

2

Turkey

8

3

Uganda

1

0

Venezuela

0

1

Vietnam

0

1

Zimbabwe

5

10

Total

186

127

 

 

Suspect Nationality (dual nationalities)

2024

(Jan – Dec)

2025

(Jan – Sept)

England; Zimbabwe

1

0

Iran; Other

1

0

Jordan; Saudi Arabia

1

0

Morocco; Spain

1

0

UK; Bangladesh

3

0

UK; Botswana

0

1

UK; Dominican Republic

1

0

UK; Grenada

1

0

UK; India

0

1

UK; Iran

0

2

UK; Iraq

2

0

UK; Ireland

0

1

UK; Oman

1

0

UK; Other

2

1

UK; Philippines

1

0

UK; Poland

0

1

UK; Romania

0

1

UK; Seychelles

1

0

UK; United States of America

2

1

Total

18

9

 

If available, a breakdown of offence types (e.g., rape, sexual assault, harassment) allegedly committed by non-British nationals for 2024 and 2025 (to September).

Offender Description where suspect is a non-British National

2024

(Jan – Dec)

2025

(Jan – Sept)

Assault a girl under 13 by penetration with a part of your body / a thing

0

1

Assault a male 13 or over by penetration with part of body / a thing

3

0

Attempted rape of a Female aged 16 or over

1

0

Attempted rape of a Female aged under 16

1

0

Cause a male 13 or over to engage in a penetrative sexual activity

1

0

Engage in penetrative sexual activity with a girl 13 to 15 - offender under 18

1

0

Engage in sexual communication with a child

3

2

Exposure

9

8

Knowingly / recklessly trespassed on premises with intent to commit a relevant sexual offence

0

1

Offender 18 or over cause / incite a girl 13 to 15 to engage in sexual activity - no penetration

1

0

Offender under 18 cause / incite a boy 13 to 15 to engage in sexual activity - no penetration

1

0

Rape a girl under 13

0

1

Rape a man 16 or over

1

3

Rape of a Female aged 16 or over

66

47

Rape of a Female aged under 16

3

1

Send photograph or film of genitals

1

1

Send/threaten to share photograph or film of a person in an intimate state intending to cause alarm, distress, humiliation or for the purposes of sexual gratification

3

1

Sexual assault of a female 13 or over by penetration

14

9

Sexual assault of a female child under 13

3

2

Sexual assault of a male child under 13 by penetration

1

0

Sexual assault on a female

65

37

Sexual assault on a male aged 13 or over

6

4

Share/threaten to share photograph or film of person in an intimate state without consent

1

1

Voyeurism - recording a private act

1

8

Total

186

127

 

 

Offender Description where suspect is has a dual nationality

2024

(Jan – Dec)

2025

(Jan – Sept)

Adult meet a boy under 16 years of age following grooming

0

1

Arrange / facilitate the commission of a child sex offence

1

0

Exposure

1

0

Rape of a Female aged 16 or over

9

1

Send/threaten to share photograph or film of a person in an intimate state intending to cause alarm, distress, humiliation or for the purposes of sexual gratification

2

0

Sexual assault of a female 13 or over by penetration

1

1

Sexual assault on a female

2

5

Sexual assault on a male aged 13 or over

1

1

Voyeurism - recording a private act

1

0

Total

18

9

Please could we request: non British nationals + dual nationals separately

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member

Doctor or Engineer?

Welsh choirboy?

Diversity is our greatest strength 3 times.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
8 hours ago, SunnyinBangrak said:

Sounds much like Brits haven't moved on from the glory days of teenage gang rape victims being told to "shut their mouths for the sake of diversity".


Seriously, you have been pulled up several times about this. You are either too dense to read or too ignorant to want to understand. Probably both. If you genuinely believe what you write after having been corrected several times then there is no hope for you whatsoever - by continually posting the same fake nonsense you are deliberately trying to skew things.

https://fullfact.org/online/naz-shah-diversity-quote-tweet/

It was a parody, it was not supposed to be taken literally, it was being ironic. But you knew that. It was up for eight minutes before she realised that knuckle draggers were twisting her meaning and she took it down. One group even quoted it and called her "a grooming gang apologist" which is amazing given her history of working against grooming gangs, unlike Yaxley-Lennon who only jumped on other people's bandwagons.

From the link above:

In 2020, Ms Shah successfully sued the campaigning group Leave.EU after it called her a “grooming gang apologist” in a 2019 Facebook post. The group apologised and accepted Ms Shah was a "vociferous campaigner for victims of grooming gangs", said their post was “ill-judged and untrue” and paid her damages for libel. 

Please, after the fourth time now, please read it, and please give it a rest - you're just making yourself look very very stupid. I get it, you don't understand who she is or what she does, you don't understand irony, you don't actually understand anything. Four times should be enough.

And yes, I will continue to pull you up and expose your willful ignorance every single time I see you perpetuate this lie.

SunnyinBangrak Ruby Member

SunnyinBangrak

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:


Seriously, you have been pulled up several times about this. You are either too dense to read or too ignorant to want to understand. Probably both. If you genuinely believe what you write after having been corrected several times then there is no hope for you whatsoever - by continually posting the same fake nonsense you are deliberately trying to skew things.

https://fullfact.org/online/naz-shah-diversity-quote-tweet/

It was a parody, it was not supposed to be taken literally, it was being ironic. But you knew that. It was up for eight minutes before she realised that knuckle draggers were twisting her meaning and she took it down. One group even quoted it and called her "a grooming gang apologist" which is amazing given her history of working against grooming gangs, unlike Yaxley-Lennon who only jumped on other people's bandwagons.

From the link above:

In 2020, Ms Shah successfully sued the campaigning group Leave.EU after it called her a “grooming gang apologist” in a 2019 Facebook post. The group apologised and accepted Ms Shah was a "vociferous campaigner for victims of grooming gangs", said their post was “ill-judged and untrue” and paid her damages for libel. 

Please, after the fourth time now, please read it, and please give it a rest - you're just making yourself look very very stupid. I get it, you don't understand who she is or what she does, you don't understand irony, you don't actually understand anything. Four times should be enough.

And yes, I will continue to pull you up and expose your willful ignorance every single time I see you perpetuate this lie.

I believe Lucy Connolly was " only joking " too. How did that work out for her? Remind me pls

And no, forum laptop deniers are not in a position to correct or pull up anybody about anything. You chose your hill to die on. The rest is history.

josephbloggs Diamond Member

josephbloggs

Advanced Member
Just now, SunnyinBangrak said:

I believe Lucy Connolly was " only joking " too. How did that work out for her? Remind me pls


Oh dear. Another clueless post. She wasn't "joking". She never even tried to argue she was "joking". Where do you get your "news"? I would love to know, except I think I have a good idea already.

If she was joking why did she plead guilty to "inciting racial hatred, specifically by publishing/distributing written material that was threatening or abusive with the intention of stirring up racial hatred?"

How did that work out for her? Remind me please. Not a joke, she pleaded guilty to the charge and was sentenced accordingly.

I know you are averse to reading things but here are the judge's sentencing remarks:

https://crimeline.co.uk/lucy-connolly-sentencing-remarks-17-october-2024/

And here's the Court of Appeal's Judgement, read it at will.

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Lucy-Connolly-v-The-King.pdf

Not a very funny joke, and she never even tried to pretend it was one - you made that bit up yourself. You have no idea, none at all.


And no, forum laptop deniers are not in a position to correct or pull up anybody about anything. You chose your hill to die on. The rest is history.

What is a forum laptop denier? I am typing this on a laptop, they exist.

And I can pull up anyone I like if they disseminate lies. It is sad you don't have the ability to fact check what you read before you repeat it - you are part of the problem.

But seriously what on earth are you wibbling on about laptop deniers? You make no sense.



Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.