Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Far-Right AfD Surges To 44% In Germany State Vote

Germany’s far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) is on course for a record result in the eastern state of Saxony-Anhalt, according to initial projections, placing it well ahead of mainstream rivals. It remains unclear whether the party can form a government, but the AfD says it has secured a mandate to govern.

AfD Stands To Win 44% In Saxony-Anhalt

Projections indicate the AfD could win 44% of the vote, exceeding its previous high by a wide margin and putting it far in front of the conservative CDU, which is projected to take 17.8%. The state has a population of around 2.1 million.

The AfD’s Saxony-Anhalt leader, Ulrich Siegmund, said the result was “sensational” and indicated the party wanted to begin governing as soon as possible. He also rejected the domestic intelligence assessment describing the party in the state as “right-wing extremist”.

No far-right party has controlled a German state since the Second World War. If the AfD were to take power, it would gain responsibilities including policing, local education and culture.

Coalition Math Hinges On Smaller Parties

AfD leaders will not know whether they have enough seats to govern until it is clear which smaller parties enter the state parliament. Siegmund has so far declined to lead a minority government, but the party’s national leadership sees that as a possible route.

A key uncertainty is whether the left-wing populist party BSW clears the 5% threshold needed for parliament. If BSW fails to enter, the AfD’s path to a majority would improve. If BSW does enter, the AfD is currently projected to have 39 seats in the 83-seat assembly.

Other parties have said they would not form coalitions with the AfD, using a “firewall” aimed at keeping the far-right out of government. In Saxony-Anhalt, BSW has offered to cooperate with the AfD on certain issues if it wins seats.

Supporters celebrated at the AfD election-night party headquarters as projections appeared on screens, with some later singing Germany’s national anthem. Siegmund told supporters the result was “a signal for the whole of Germany”.

German And International Reactions Follow Vote

Opposition parties and commentators described the outcome as a major break with the past. Main television channel Das Erste cancelled a planned episode of its long-running crime drama Tatort to focus on what the result could mean.

Siegmund’s comments were echoed by political opponents and mainstream parties who said they would have to respond to the new balance of power. The CDU’s Sven Schulze conceded victory and said the party would have to deal with the result after an “extremely tough and intensive election campaign”. The Social Democrats (SPD), describing the result as “truly dramatic”, said it would serve as a warning nationally. Lars Klingbeil, leader of the SPD and a member of the federal government led by the CDU, said it was a “signal to Berlin” and that the government would hear it.

International reactions also followed the projections. US President Donald Trump posted a screenshot of the German TV result on Truth Social. Russian presidential envoy Kirill Dmitriev shared a screengrab of Trump’s post and praised what he called a “historic win for the pragmatic AfD”. Dmitriev had previously described the AfD in positive terms, and during Germany’s federal election campaign last year US Vice-President JD Vance endorsed the party, a move criticised in Germany as political interference.

Policies Draw Concerns Over Deportations And Education

AfD stands on an openly pro-Russia and anti-migration platform. Among its policies is “remigration”, widely understood as mass deportations of migrants, though the party says it means deporting criminals and people in the country illegally. The party says it would be limited by law if it is not able to control federal policy, but state-level powers could still affect implementation locally.

The party has also targeted the Bauhaus school of design, arguing it was a “dead-end of modernism” and referencing the Nazi regime’s closure of the school in Dessau in 1933, a framing some critics say echoes Nazi rhetoric.

Charlotte Knobloch, a Holocaust survivor and veteran head of the Jewish community in Munich and Bavaria, said she was frightened by the outcome and called on mainstream parties not to “stand by and allow this decline”.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

7 September 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

Captain Flack Star Member

Captain Flack

Global Moderator

Trolling Holocaust denial post and post linking to social media removed @Tourist2

Rule 10. You will not post troll messages. Trolling is the act of purposefully antagonizing forum members by posting controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking other members into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

18. Social media content is acceptable in most forums. However, in factual areas such as, but not limited to news, current affairs and health topics, social media cannot be used unless it is from a credible news media source or a government agency and must include a link to the original source.

Sir Dude Gold Member

Sir Dude

Advanced Member
(edited)

It's quite simple really. Once you go too far toward either extreme you unwittingly sow the seeds of the opposite to grow because the far-left or far-right only ultimately offers failure. People become desperate and see it all going wrong, so decide something resembling a major correction is needed to the opposite, but that's wrong and history has constantly proven this to be the case.

You also have a constanly disillusioned youth every generation wanting change because they are constantly being screwed over too... which means they rebel easily.

The answers are in the middle, and to be honest, whether you should be center-left or center-right depends on the topic, and different issues require different approaches... it's a beguiling myth that one side or the other offers the elusive answers to everything, but a powerful one.

For example, when it comes to things like quality free health and welfare services for those citizens who need it or civil rights and freedoms, then we should be approaching those sort of things from the liberal perspective... however, you need a robust economy to pay for it and strong emergency services/police and armed forces to protect it and your society, which comes from the center-right. You need balance as not all topics require the same style of thinking to succeed.

Really, well-functioning countries have a mix of both sides depending on the topic/issue. You have to have compassion where fair and just, but also strength and will to protect it and do what's right for you people... otherwise you end up in the toilet, which is where Europe has essentually gone through falling foul of this.

Trouble is, the longer you let it fester and worsen, the stronger the medine needed to fix it and put things back on track... hence rebellions, revolutions, sudden political realignments, or civil unrest happen.

Politicians are spineless and just kick the can down the road, mainly because their terms in power are too short to really fix things, so why bother? Just ride the gravy power train and go down as a footnote in history instead of making hard decisions people want results on. Something is going to have to give at some point and it could be messy... people are becoming increasingly annoyed with what's happening.

Edited by Sir Dude

mangkut70 Senior Member

mangkut70

Member
48 minutes ago, Schoggibueb said:

If you really followed what AfD want's to solve - it's nothing. They play - like in the US and UK - the "anger card - we against them up there. They are confirmed right-wing extremist.

It's tragic that the voters in Saxony-Anhalt and former East-Germany aren't able to understand what they voted for.

They will get what they voted for. And it's not getting better for them. Just like in 1933, as NSDAP's seizure of power began.

But as I can read here by a few neo-nazis - they call themselves conservatives- hurray hurray - let us glorify the Nazi regime again.

I disagree, but be that as it may, the facts of the election results speak for themselves. It is the nature of democracy that political majorities can change and governments can be voted out of office by the people. Clearly, many voters want the implementation of the measures promised by the AfD. (A curious fact: At the ballot box, the AfD received over 50% of the vote, while apparently their success in postal voting was, strangely enough, only around 20% – Ein Schelm wer Böses dabei denkt)

If they come to power (in my opinion, only a matter of time), they will have to prove that they have the courage and the ability to achieve their goals and deliver on their promises.

If not, they will lose the voters again. That is perfectly normal in a functioning democracy.

I think they have benefited greatly so far from the "Brandmauer" and their role in opposition under incompetent governments.

 

 

Yagoda Star Member

Yagoda

Advanced Member
6 hours ago, BritManToo said:

I doubt you have any Jewish friends!

And you appear to hate Israel.

You nailed that one.

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
(edited)
35 minutes ago, Sir Dude said:

It's quite simple really. Once you go too far toward either extreme you unwittingly sow the seeds of the opposite to grow because the far-left or far-right only ultimately offers failure. People become desperate and see it all going wrong, so decide something resembling a major correction is needed to the opposite, but that's wrong and history has constantly proven this to be the case.

You also have a constanly disillusioned youth every generation wanting change because they are constantly being screwed over too... which means they rebel easily.

The answers are in the middle, and to be honest, whether you should be center-left or center-right depends on the topic, and different issues require different approaches... it's a beguiling myth that one side or the other offers the elusive answers to everything, but a powerful one.

For example, when it comes to things like quality free health and welfare services for those citizens who need it or civil rights and freedoms, then we should be approaching those sort of things from the liberal perspective... however, you need a robust economy to pay for it and strong emergency services/police and armed forces to protect it and your society, which comes from the center-right. You need balance as not all topics require the same style of thinking to succeed.

Really, well-functioning countries have a mix of both sides depending on the topic/issue. You have to have compassion where fair and just, but also strength and will to protect it and do what's right for you people... otherwise you end up in the toilet, which is where Europe has essentually gone through falling foul of this.

Trouble is, the longer you let it fester and worsen, the stronger the medine needed to fix it and put things back on track... hence rebellions, revolutions, sudden political realignments, or civil unrest happen.

Politicians are spineless and just kick the can down the road, mainly because their terms in power are too short to really fix things, so why bother? Just ride the gravy power train and go down as a footnote in history instead of making hard decisions people want results on. Something is going to have to give at some point and it could be messy... people are becoming increasingly annoyed with what's happening.

While I broadly agree with you, I don't remember the current (or other recent) German government being far-left.

I think the main reason for the rise of the far-right is that it hasn't been in power before. People think that the center-left or center-right did not provide good enough results, and want to have a try at something else. The far-right (or the far-left) will likely also not satisfy voters and will eventually be voted out like the other parties, as happened in Austria. A notable exception being Meloni, but she significantly watered down her initial stance (her economic adviser is Draghi and she was happy to get a loan from the EU).

Edited by candide

Sir Dude Gold Member

Sir Dude

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, candide said:

While I broadly agree with you, I don't remember the current (or other recent) German government being far-left.

Whilst your post does have merit, I think it goes back to Merkel (and you are right, she/the CDU wasn't technically far-left, but often acted like it) and her unusually long tenure of power caused the usual poor judgements and assumptions, and when that happens with a few ill-thought-through disasterous decisions... especially the one where she hubritically opened the door to over a million undocumented migrants with no screening and just said "We can do it" with the effects only being realised long after she left power... history will judge her harshly on that one sentence. It goes back to her and a completely niave idea, which Germany is paying dearly now for.

I know they wanted immigration to fix their economy and demographic problem, but there are better ways to do this than just fling the doors open and accept anyone and everyone from the all the basket cases of the world... what could go wrong?

You reap what you sow, I'm afraid... and she didn't consider the reprecussions later down the road, which are all too clear now.

People in general now are much more ready to grab their pitchfork and go out shouting and making themselves felt than before because so much is wrong. Politicians have to acknowledge that and find answers to placate the voting public and make things better, as that is their purpose... but they often seem to have forgotten this.

metisdead Legendary Member

Posts with derogatory nicknames, intentional misspellings, or personal remarks will be removed. Spell names correctly for all sides of the debate.

msbkk Gold Member

msbkk

Advanced Member
13 hours ago, brewsterbudgen said:

Very sad to see. You'd have thought the Germans had learned from history.

Ridiculous comment. The election was only in a former DDR eastern German state.

Mr Awesome Silver Member

Mr Awesome

Advanced Member
11 hours ago, Patrick Wahle said:

Get out of the EU, get rid of the euro and stop supporting Ukraine. This is one of the main topics Alice Weidel, leader of the AfD, supports then re-establish German sovereignty over its borders.

If she succeeds, it will be the end of the EU because Germany is one of the main contributor to the EU budget. It will show the path for other right wing parties in Denmark, Netherlands, France, Italy and some other Eastern European countries like Hungary, Slovakia and Romania .

Thank you for the explanation.

Cameroni Star Member

Cameroni

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, swissie said:

After "reunification" several little mistakes were made.

To convert the eastern currency 1:1 to the Deutsche Mark was the root of all problems. Leaving former DDR states unable to economically compete internationally.

To integrate the new "Bundeslaender" the "Treuhand" was formed. Opening the door for West German "robber barons", descending like locust on the new Bundeslaender. Plundering what was valueable, leaving the new Bundeslaender as an industrial skeleton behind. The urge to seriously invest there by West Germans was never high on the agenda.

So, the ex DDR has never recovered from this raid. Eternal economic depression as a result.

What made Hitler great? The economic depression in the wake of 1929.

And now, everybody is wondering why the AFD has become so strong.

It may have a little to do with unbridled, unrestrained migration policies as well.

swissie Ruby Member

swissie

Advanced Member
23 minutes ago, Cameroni said:

It may have a little to do with unbridled, unrestrained migration policies as well.

Yes indeed, I forgot to mention this factor. Especially if the migrants show little interest of learning the language and have no marketable skills.

In Germany, the market for oriental "sheep herders" is saturated.

brewsterbudgen Star Member

brewsterbudgen

Advanced Member
10 hours ago, msbkk said:

Ridiculous comment. The election was only in a former DDR eastern German state.

Good point. Maybe the German people as a whole will show more sense in future elections.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member

Great news.

image.png

Shame they fell short of an overall majority.

Long may this trend continue. People are sick of seeing their countries destroyed by inane leftist policies.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, impulse said:

The thick plottens.... Apparently AfD did have a majority of those voting in person. But some really odd mail in voting reduced it to 44%. Every other party had more mail in votes than in person votes.

Doesn't surprise me.

I'm waiting for all the leaders to be banned from politics for 10 years for dropping litter, or something.

SiSePuede419 Ruby Member

SiSePuede419

Advanced Member

"There's no Nazis in Germany"

-- My German girlfriend, before I dumped her for being a cold fish in bed

sure-nodding.gif

impulse Star Member

impulse

Advanced Member
8 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Doesn't surprise me.

I'm waiting for all the leaders to be banned from politics for 10 years for dropping litter, or something.

Didn't they try that recently on AfD? Not for litter, but some other "reason"?

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
On 9/7/2026 at 7:02 AM, supersomchai said:

I wonder how many pro Afd supporters live in Thailand ….oh the irony …🫢

Not as many as Brexiteers or RN voters! 😁

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
(edited)
4 hours ago, impulse said:

The thick plottens.... Apparently AfD did have a majority of those voting in person. But some really odd mail in voting reduced it to 44%. Every other party had more mail in votes than in person votes.

Screenshot 2026-09-08 092018.png

HERE WE GO AGAIN: Germany’s AfD ROBBED of Victory as Mail-In Ballots Flip Results in Saxony-Anhalt The Gateway Pundit by Collin McMahon

And here we are with a MAGA indirectly suggesting that Trump's lies may apply to Germany! 😂

And as usual, it's a ridiculous claim because AfD was the number one! 😃

Edited by candide

impulse Star Member

impulse

Advanced Member
18 hours ago, Schoggibueb said:

It's tragic that the voters in Saxony-Anhalt and former East-Germany aren't able to understand what they voted for.

I suspect they were voting against something.

I agree. It's tragic that VW is laying off 100K people and shutting a down factory for the first time in over 80 years. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

I don't equate the AfD with the NSDAP, but history seems to be rhyming here, if not repeating.

SiSePuede419 Ruby Member

SiSePuede419

Advanced Member

Another successful western society collapsing because they're being surpassed by the Chinese and the burden of supporting "poor geography" (Greece) and to a lesser extent Italy and Spain in the EU, not to mention the fear and shame of the natives who think supporting Russia is going to make them richer? OMG. You guys are full of sausage. Morons. The far right isn't going to help you in the long run.

impulse Star Member

impulse

Advanced Member
57 minutes ago, candide said:

And here we are with a MAGA indirectly suggesting that Trump's lies may apply to Germany!

And as usual, it's a ridiculous claim because AfD was the number one!

Just looking at AfD and CDU, how do you account for the difference in the ratio of mail-in versus in-person voting?

I doubt that it's because the CDU voters are too lazy to show up on the day. I'm curious, aren't you?

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
(edited)
3 minutes ago, impulse said:

Just looking at AfD and CDU, how do you account for the difference in the ratio of mail-in versus in-person voting?

I doubt that it's because the CDU voters are too lazy to show up on the day. I'm curious, aren't you?

It's the same in other landers, including where the AfD is weak and has no chance to win an election. In 2025, 37% of voters voted by mail in Germany.

https://bundestagwahlumfrage.de/ratgeber/wahlsystem/briefwahl

Are you suggesting without any evidence that the Land government rigged the election? 😀

Edited by candide

candide Star Member

candide

Advanced Member
10 minutes ago, pub2022 said:

Far right?

They're just normal people who want their country back.

Stop the Islamization.

Let's get out of the EU.

And also stop the demonization of Nazis! 😅

Schoggibueb Gold Member

Schoggibueb

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, impulse said:

I suspect they were voting against something.

I agree. It's tragic that VW is laying off 100K people and shutting a down factory for the first time in over 80 years. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

I don't equate the AfD with the NSDAP, but history seems to be rhyming here, if not repeating.

Saxony-Anhalt does not have a Volkswagen automobile plant.

The language of the AfD uses in many ways the same words like the NSDAP did, deliberately employs charged buzzwords and combative terms to delegitimize political opponents, stir up emotions such as anger, and shift the discourse to the right.

Remigration: A term originating from the New Right that the AfD uses to call for the mass repatriation or deportation of people with a migration background.

Überfremdung: (excessive influx of foreigners): Describes a fear-laden notion of the German population undergoing change due to immigration.

Umvolkung: (demographic replacement): A term with a historically charged past, suggesting that the replacement of the native population through immigration is a deliberate political objective.

Björn Höcke is the defining figure of the AfD. You can call him a fascist and you can call him a Nazi.

If a party's defining figure is a Nazi, then it is a Nazi party.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.