Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Thailand News and Discussion Forum | ASEANNOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

Trump: BBC as 'corrupt, criminal and beyond fake news'

US President Donald Trump has sharply criticised the BBC, accusing it of producing misleading coverage as a legal dispute between the two sides continues.

Speaking at the White House, Mr Trump described the broadcaster in strongly critical terms while responding to questions about a defamation lawsuit he has filed over a television documentary.

Get today's headlines by email image.png

Legal dispute over documentary

The case centres on an episode of the BBC’s Panorama programme broadcast in 2024, which drew controversy over its portrayal of comments made by Mr Trump following the 2020 US presidential election.

The programme was criticised for suggesting that the then former president had encouraged supporters to storm the US Capitol in January 2021 after losing the election to Joe Biden.

Mr Trump has denied that characterisation and launched a lawsuit seeking $10bn (£7.5bn) in damages.

The BBC has since filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing against the claims made in the lawsuit.

BBC response and internal fallout

The controversy surrounding the programme led to significant internal repercussions at the broadcaster.

Director-general Tim Davie resigned following criticism that the documentary may have selectively edited footage of Mr Trump’s remarks.

BBC chairman Samir Shah also issued an apology, acknowledging what he described as an “error of judgment” in how the material had been presented.

He said the editing created the impression that Mr Trump had made a direct call for violent action, a characterisation that has been strongly disputed by the former president and his supporters.

Trump’s latest criticism

Mr Trump renewed his criticism of the BBC while hosting Irish Prime Minister Micheál Martin in the Oval Office.

He told reporters that footage used in the documentary had been manipulated and claimed that artificial intelligence may have been used to generate certain clips. He did not provide evidence to support that claim.

The US president also criticised the BBC’s reporting on the ongoing conflict involving the United States and Iran, describing it as inaccurate.

According to Mr Trump, coverage of the war did not reflect what he characterised as US military success.

Broader tensions with media

Mr Trump has frequently criticised media organisations, both in the United States and internationally, accusing them of bias and misrepresentation.

His use of the term “fake news” has been a recurring feature of his political rhetoric, often directed at outlets he considers critical of his administration.

The latest comments come as tensions remain high between the White House and sections of the media over coverage of both domestic and international issues.

Ongoing proceedings

It remains unclear how the legal case between Mr Trump and the BBC will proceed.

When asked about the lawsuit, Mr Trump said he would wait to see how the situation develops.

The dispute highlights broader questions about media accountability, editorial standards and the use of footage in political reporting, particularly in cases involving high-profile public figures.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png

Already a member? haveyr-say.png


image.png
Adapted by ASEAN Now. Source 18 March 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

philipsharpe Senior Member

philipsharpe

Member

Like him or hate him,Trump's not wrong here.

JimHuaHin Platinum Member

JimHuaHin

Advanced Member

Seems Trump is confused - he was looking in a mirror, not at the BBC.

riclag Star Member

riclag

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, philipsharpe said:

Like him or hate him,Trump's not wrong here.

Cheers mate!

Its over, the BBC already admitted they did the dirty deed.

Despite everyone knowing why,all thats left is to show the world why, during court proceedings.

JonnyF Star Member

JonnyF

Advanced Member

Trump is bang on the money.

Defund them. Full of grifters and Pedos working there.

Jingthing Legendary Member

Jingthing

Advanced Member

Trump being the world's top expert in corruption and criminality.

JBChiangRai Diamond Member

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member
6 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Trump is bang on the money.

Defund them. Full of grifters and Pedos working there.

link please

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member

As posted on the Soapbox topic:

21 hours ago

There are 2 factors here long before the case will ever be a determination that the BBC acted with malice:

Florida defamation law:

Key Elements of a Florida Defamation Case

Publication: The false statement was communicated to a third party (written or oral).

As of yet the Trump team has yet to prove anyone in Florida saw the Panorama doc -- only as in their compliant that it was "immense likelihood" that someone saw it.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) allows for case dismissal if a complaint fails to state a claim that is plausible on its face, not merely possible.

What seems IM-plausible to me is that, if the Trump team are so certain someone in Florida actually saw it, they would by now have been able to find at least one such person.

gargamon Ruby Member

gargamon

Advanced Member
23 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Trump being the world's top expert in corruption and criminality.

And pedophilia.

Chomper Higgot Star Member

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Trump is bang on the money.

Defund them. Full of grifters and Pedos working there.

Don’t mention Pedos around Trump, he’ll start another illegal war of aggression.

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member

The Trump legal team is claiming $10 billion in damages but heretofore they cannot prove that even one person in Florida saw the Panorama doc.

So in their response to the Motion to Dismiss, they seem to have to show one of two things: Either that the hypothetical argument that someone MAY have viewed the doc is sufficient even if the viewership i.e. via VPN was unauthorized OR find Doris Goldblatt * in The Villages who will swear under oath that she saw it legit subscription or otherwise.

* (with David Letterman) Mick Jagger seemed to have the most fun with item no. 4, “A good way to keep yourself entertained is to sign every 10th autograph ‘Doris Goldblatt’

stevenl Star Member

stevenl

Advanced Member
18 hours ago, JerryM said:

What seems IM-plausible to me is that, if the Trump team are so certain someone in Florida actually saw it, they would by now have been able to find at least one such person.

Maybe they have, or would they be legally required to come forward with the information?

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, vinny41 said:

23. The Panorama Documentary was available to be viewed by citizens of Florida and was, in fact, viewed in Florida by citizens of Florida, notwithstanding the BBC’s anticipated, and inaccurate claims that the Documentary was unviewable in the United States due to purported geolocking

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.703382/gov.uscourts.flsd.703382.1.0_5.pdf

Great. Find one.

vinny41 Platinum Member

vinny41

Advanced Member
1 minute ago, JerryM said:

Great. Find one.

its not the forum job to find out You should leave that down to Trump legal team

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
3 minutes ago, vinny41 said:

its not the forum job to find out You should leave that down to Trump legal team

Exactly what I meant. If it's a FACT the doc was viewed by persons in Florida, then Team Trump should be able to find at least one "third party person" who saw it per Florida defamation law.

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member

And for a bit of levity this Sunday morning, this from Gemini AI:

To bridge the gap between a UK-only broadcast and a Florida-based injury, the lawsuit (filed December 15, 2025) alleges the following:

Skyrocketing Demand: The (Trump) lawsuit cites data from research firms like vpnMentor, alleging a 51% increase in VPN demand in Florida around the documentary's debut in late 2024, and a staggering 1,000% increase in early 2025.

HOWEVER

NB Anti-pornography Florida House Bill 3 (HB 3), signed in March 2024,

The "Pornhub Effect"

While the law is aimed at age verification, the massive spike in VPN demand was primarily triggered by the response of major adult sites:

The Blackout: Rather than complying with the age-verification requirements (citing privacy and security risks), Pornhub and its sister sites (RedTube, YouPorn) chose to geo-block Florida IP addresses entirely.

The Surge: Immediately following the January 1st rollout, VPN demand in Florida reportedly skyrocketed by 1,150% within the first few hours as residents sought to bypass the geo-block by masking their location.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.