Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Become a member

Become a member

USS Lincoln Sailors Reportedly Try to Jump Overboard

Families and members of Congress have raised alarms about what they describe as a deepening mental health crisis aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, with reports saying sailors tried to jump overboard during a record-breaking deployment linked to the conflict involving Iran.

Two specialist military publications, Navy Times and Stars and Stripes, reported multiple incidents in which crew members attempted to jump into the sea. The allegations come as the aircraft carrier’s crew has spent the ninth month at sea and has accumulated 250 consecutive days without making landfall, a modern record for an aircraft carrier.

Families question leadership at town hall

Stars and Stripes said military families voiced their concerns directly to senior Navy figures at an emotional community meeting in San Diego last Thursday. The publication said about 200 family members attended a town hall that included Acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao and other senior officials.

Several relatives described distress about the conditions their loved ones face. Stars and Stripes reported that one spouse said her husband had texted her that he was worried about not waking up the next day. Another attendee told Cao that, in her view, the service had broken trust between families and command, the paper reported.

Reports cite failed suicide attempts onboard

Navy Times reported details of thwarted suicide attempts during the current deployment. The outlet said a spouse of one sailor described how the man tried to jump overboard after further extensions to time at sea left him exhausted. Another family member described a separate incident in which a sailor stopped a shipmate from attempting to jump, grabbing him and pulling him back on deck.

Congressional figures in California and Colorado also criticised conditions aboard the warship. Mike Levin, a Democratic representative, posted comments on X describing what he said were worsening daily conditions, including inadequate sanitation and extremely limited provisions. Jason Crow, another Democrat, said the pressure on service members and their families on the Lincoln was building steadily.

Warship redirected as fighting with Iran continues

The Lincoln left San Diego on 21 November and was originally expected to operate in the Pacific. The ship was then redirected to the Middle East after the start of the US-Israel war involving Iran, according to the reports.

MS Now said the 5,000-plus crew has had only two days on land since departure: in Guam in December and in Oman in July. The deployment was originally due to end in May but has been extended more than once as the wider conflict continued.

In April, public criticism grew after photos emerged showing what campaigners and lawmakers described as poor-quality and rationed food, along with reports of water shortages, mould in showers and broken laundry equipment. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth dismissed the accounts as “more fake news”, Levin later said he responded to the comment, arguing that service members still deserved basic amenities such as clean water, functioning toilets and adequate meals.

Navy response says no increase identified

The Guardian contacted the US Navy for comment on reports of attempts to jump overboard. After the article was published, a Navy official said the service recognised that extended deployments place significant strain on service members and their families and that it valued their “resilience and sacrifices”.

The official said that, based on information available to the command, there had been no identified increase in reported suicidal ideation or suicide attempts aboard the ship. The Navy also said religious, medical and mental health professionals were available as part of a “comprehensive support network”, including onboard deployment-resilience counsellors and chaplains.

The official said the war had disrupted some traditional supply routes, but added that reports from the ship confirm continuous access to clean water, functional air conditioning and “healthy meal options”.

Mental health strain on active-duty sailors

Mental health challenges for active-duty US sailors have been widely reported. A study published last year examined stress factors specific to deployed sailors and found that common concerns included loud noises, lack of rest and inadequate mental and physical healthcare. The researchers reported that almost half of deployed sailors surveyed said they were not receiving adequate help to cope with stress at sea, and concluded that improved access to care on ships was urgently needed given rates of military suicide, including within the Navy.

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

13 August 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

VocalNeal Star Member

VocalNeal

Advanced Member

What they need I believe is called a "swim call". A lull in military activity when the ship stops and the crew all go swimming. Good for morale.

Oh and they could rinse their mouths out with saline solution.

Bangkok Barry Star Member

Bangkok Barry

Advanced Member

I suppose they could have taken office jobs instead? Home every evening, weekends off, choose your own food and what to do during your regular down time.

JAG Ruby Member

JAG

Advanced Member
55 minutes ago, IsaanT said:

Only under Trump's regime could such a misguided and incompetent person such as Hegseth find himself in such a huge position of power. He's the biggest problem because he has the power to take steps to alleviate the issues but doesn't.

But I am sure that the logistical supply chain ensures that there is sufficient testosterone!

I mean, who needs to brush their teeth or wipe their arse?

SOTIRIOS Platinum Member

SOTIRIOS

Advanced Member

....So Is..'A Moral Conviction Against Going To Murder'...

...A 'Mental Health Issue' Now... (?)

spidermike007 Star Member

spidermike007

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, IsaanT said:

Only under Trump's regime could such a misguided and incompetent person such as Hegseth find himself in such a huge position of power. He's the biggest problem because he has the power to take steps to alleviate the issues but doesn't.

Fascinating that he spent $16 million on lobster tail, crab and other exotic seafoods, and the soldiers don't have enough to eat. Very typical of the US and how it treats its soldiers, this has been going on for a long time. Ask any veteran who's trying to get medical care.

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, ronnie50 said:

We should also keep in mind all the merchant mariners stuck on those freighters and tankers. Many of them are probably in worse shape by now.

There is no reason why the ship owners cannot provide relief crews either by boat or helicopter!

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
1 hour ago, scottiejohn said:

There is no reason why the ship owners cannot provide relief crews either by boat or helicopter!

Yes, there are several reasons why they cannot do this, least of all it's a war zone.

unblocktheplanet Star Member

unblocktheplanet

Advanced Member
(edited)

Wonder how many are questioning their decision to sign up for the military?

How is the huge aircraft carrier--5,700 crew, 90 warplanes, 30 helicopters--resupplied? Food...porn videos, toilet paper? Nuclear-powered so it doesn't need fuel.

What a criminal waste of taxpayer money for human rights abuse.

What are the death benefits and pension to families?

Edited by unblocktheplanet
add

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
23 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Yes, there are several reasons why they cannot do this, least of all it's a war zone.

Not where the ships are anchored.

How do you think the crew are getting fed etc?

soalbundy Diamond Member

soalbundy

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, Srikcir said:

During World War II, U.S. Navy aircraft carriers typically remained at sea for 60 to 90 consecutive days. And under constant threat of enemy bomber and warship threats.

During the Napoleonic wars British sailors on sailing ships could spend up to two years sailing back and forth in front of French ports to block the French navy from sailing out and their food really was something modern people would find hard to swallow. never separate an American serviceman from his ice cream.

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
46 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Not where the ships are anchored.

How do you think the crew are getting fed etc?

Yes it is, including where the ships are anchored. Food doesn't need immigration clearance.

VillageIdiot Silver Member

VillageIdiot

Advanced Member

American military operations have gone from tragedy into farce.

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, NanLaew said:

Yes it is, including where the ships are anchored. Food doesn't need immigration clearance.

What a stupid comment!

How do you think VLCC crews are rostered even in normal times?

Most VLCCs are too large to enter harbour and so moor to offshore pumping buoys/pipelines to upload and then anchor in a roadstead to transfer to smaller tankers nearer to their destination!

When there they rotate crews, replenish all sorts of stocks etc!

I assume you have never been involved in maritime operations!

Mr Awesome Silver Member

Mr Awesome

Advanced Member
2 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

What a stupid comment!

How do you think VLCC crews are rostered even in normal times?

Most VLCCs are too large to enter harbour and so moor to offshore pumping buoys/pipelines to upload and then anchor in a roadstead to transfer to smaller tankers nearer to their destination!

When there they rotate crews, replenish all sorts of stocks etc!

I assume you have never been involved in maritime operations!

What does VLCC mean?

scottiejohn Star Member

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
(edited)
5 minutes ago, Mr Awesome said:

What does VLCC mean?

Verry Large Crude Carrier! A fully loaded VLCC carries approximately 2 million barrels of crude oil, worth over $150 million at current prices, across oceans that most people will never see. At 300,000 deadweight tonnes, a VLCC is longer than three football fields, as tall as a 20-storey building when viewed from the waterline, and capable of transporting more energy in a single voyage than some countries consume in a week.

It very rarely if ever berths alongside a jetty in a harbour as it is just too big.

Edited by scottiejohn

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
16 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

...

I assume you have never been involved in maritime operations!

Only for about 35 years.

scorecard Star Member

scorecard

Advanced Member
3 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

There is no reason why the ship owners cannot provide relief crews either by boat or helicopter!

OK but the merchant ship owners are very probably much more interested in costs and cost reduction.

scorecard Star Member

scorecard

Advanced Member
Just now, scorecard said:

OK but rightly or wrongly the merchant ship owners are very probably much more focused on costs and cost reductions.

Mr Awesome Silver Member

Mr Awesome

Advanced Member
18 minutes ago, scottiejohn said:

Verry Large Crude Carrier! A fully loaded VLCC carries approximately 2 million barrels of crude oil, worth over $150 million at current prices, across oceans that most people will never see. At 300,000 deadweight tonnes, a VLCC is longer than three football fields, as tall as a 20-storey building when viewed from the waterline, and capable of transporting more energy in a single voyage than some countries consume in a week.

It very rarely if ever berths alongside a jetty in a harbour as it is just too big.

Thank you for the information. I'm not very knowledgeable about nautical matters.

NanLaew Star Member

NanLaew

Advanced Member
11 hours ago, scorecard said:

OK but the merchant ship owners are very probably much more interested in costs and cost reduction.

Only around 7% of the world's entire VLCC fleet is currently stuck in the Iranian Gulf.

In normal circumstances, and due to customs, immigration and logistical challenges, it can be difficult or impossible to do an unscheduled crew change, or land crew outside of a medical emergency.

For example, back around 2004, a vessel under my management was directed by the owners to suspend west African operations and return to Corpus Christi in Texas. I managed to disembark supernumerary crew at a stop in the Bahamas en route, but the five senior Indonesian crew that were required to berth the vessel were detained onboard on arrival until their repatriation flights out of Houston were confirmed. My company was billed for their armed guard onboard the vessel and subsequent escort by US border control, from Corpus Christi, through clearing immigration at IAH, right to the jetway.

A better, peace time example was about 6 years ago when I boarded a vessel in Darwin for a project offshore Philippines. Force majeure resulted in the project being cancelled but I had been signed onboard to be disembarked in Philippines at the end of the project. Since the project was cancelled, I and the rest of the off-signing crew could not be disembarked there. The vessel's next project was in Korea so we stayed onboard until arrival in Busan. It took an extra couple of days to complete the Korean immigration procedures for an unscheduled disembarkation before we could land, head to the airport and fly home. That wasted trip was a little under 4 weeks from start to finish.

The Gulf of Iran is a war zone.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.