Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

ASEAN NOW

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Thailand sets permanent team to trace nominee firms

Thailand's Commerce and Interior ministries will form a permanent joint team to pursue suspected nominee arrangements used by foreigners to operate businesses or hold land through Thai nationals.

Commerce Minister Suphajee Suthumpun and Deputy Interior Minister Pholphee Suwanchawee agreed the plan at a meeting at 3pm on 4 September 2026 in the Kittiyakon meeting room at the Ministry of Commerce.

The Department of Business Development, Department of Provincial Administration and Land Department will link and exchange their records. Their shared database will be updated monthly, allowing officials to cross-check company registrations, shareholder changes, people connected to firms and land ownership.

Shareholder changes will be checked

A central part of the approach is the examination of historical records, rather than just a company's current shareholder structure.

IMG_2175.png

Officials said some companies had changed their structures after the government intensified its action against nominees, increasing the proportion of Thai shareholders so that paperwork appeared to meet legal requirements and avoided scrutiny.

Pholphee said officials would be able to look back even where a company had since changed its shareholders. The Department of Business Development has been asked to provide historical shareholder-change data, particularly for companies identified as targets, so the facts before any restructuring can be examined.

"Thai people should not be concerned," he said. "Following today's discussion, the Department of Business Development has already been asked to cooperate by sending historical shareholder-change information, especially for companies in the target group."

Land and business arrangements in focus

The stated aims are to protect Thai businesses and legally compliant operators from being disadvantaged by capital groups exploiting nominee channels, and to prevent Thai land being controlled by foreigners through individuals or legal entities acting as holders.

For foreigners living in or investing in Thailand, the announcement does not change the rules on legitimate foreign business ownership. It does, however, signal closer and more sustained scrutiny of structures involving Thai shareholders, as well as arrangements connected with land. Foreign investors should ensure company registrations, shareholder records and land-related transactions accurately reflect the real parties involved.

Pholphee said cases would not stop with the individual or company currently named in records. Investigations will be extended to everyone involved, including accounting offices, law firms or others who helped establish and register companies, if they are found to have known about or participated in wrongdoing.

State officials found to have been involved, or to have used their positions to assist foreigners in breaking the law, will also be investigated and prosecuted without exception, he said.

A continuing joint operation

The ministries said the team will be a continuing operation rather than a one-off task force. By connecting company, personal and land data, the three departments aim to close gaps allowing nominees to be used in both business operations and land holding.

IMG_2176.png

Pictures courtesy of Naewna

Join the discussion? Create account. orange.png


image.png

7 September 2026

User Feedback

Recommended Comments

JerryM Gold Member

JerryM

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, ikke1959 said:

A bit outdated that all the land can only being owned by Thai people.

So the next step on changing that is a proposal put forward in the House with 20 signatories.

J Branche Gold Member

J Branche

Advanced Member

The problem as the Thai's probably see it as the Gentrification of areas by Foreigners. Foreigners pushing housing prices higher.

Phuket, Samui, (Bangkok) Ratchada-Lat Phrao , Silom, Sathorn, Sukhumvit, parts of Chang Mai, and Pattaya.

Once reaches a certain level it pushes Thai's farther out, into less desirable areas or makes them pay more for the property.

One solution could be must have been Thai Resident for X years, can only buy X size or smaller in X cities, X size or smaller in rural villages. Could use a lottery type system where every month X% of applicants are permitted to purchase and own land.

Just saying I see both sides and have seen Gentrification's effects first hand in other countries.

robert2 Senior Member

robert2

Member

The land ownership restrictions are there in order for Thailand to remain in control. In practice that means the ruling class keeps their powers.

But the upside is that foreign speculative investors won't drive up prices thus barring Thai nationals to own land.

Maejo Man Platinum Member

Maejo Man

Advanced Member
2 hours ago, emptypockets said:

Where did you get this number from?

Well I spend over one million baht a year in general living and expenses and I am sure that are many thousands that spend a similar amount. That's where your billions come from. Don't judge others by what you put into the economy.

ronnie50 Platinum Member

ronnie50

Advanced Member
4 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

I understand this law as it pertains to businesses that are competing directly with Thai business owners. What I don't understand is why punish people who have invested money in Thailand, in a nice home, people who are law-abiding people, who pay taxes and people who bring a considerable amount to the table to Thailand's benefit?

That to me seems like a very anemic and xenophobic vision. Typical Anutin. Dumb and dumber.

Agree. But the officials quoted in the article seem to focus mostly on land aquisitions. They mention businesses a couple of times too. But it seems they are indeed fixated on foreign land ownership. Will they go after grandma and grandpa who retired here from America, UK or Russia and bought a house via nominees? Maybe - eventually - but so far they've gone after the bigger foreign fish that own multiple tracts of land. But they well work their way down to grandma and grandpa from Essex.

wavodavo Gold Member

wavodavo

Advanced Member

3 hours ago, FlorC said:

Good on Thailand to protect its people and land ,

the west could learn a lot from Thailand.

The boys have tasted blood lately with a few good catches and now they are going full on You never know all the ones lucky enough to be in the team might end up with a cheap condo or villa soon.

wavodavo Gold Member

wavodavo

Advanced Member
11 minutes ago, emptypockets said:

Spending and investing are two entirely different things.

A box of chang and a weekly trip to Makro is not an investment.

Oh yes it is !!! Who told you that rubbish.

mrbojangles Star Member

mrbojangles

Advanced Member
29 minutes ago, Maejo Man said:

Well I spend over one million baht a year in general living and expenses and I am sure that are many thousands that spend a similar amount. That's where your billions come from. Don't judge others by what you put into the economy.

You're right. According to google, there are 5.3 million non thais living in Thailand who contribute " hundreds of billions of baht into the Thai retail, housing, and service sectors each year."

spidermike007 Star Member

spidermike007

Advanced Member
27 minutes ago, ronnie50 said:

Agree. But the officials quoted in the article seem to focus mostly on land aquisitions. They mention businesses a couple of times too. But it seems they are indeed fixated on foreign land ownership. Will they go after grandma and grandpa who retired here from America, UK or Russia and bought a house via nominees? Maybe - eventually - but so far they've gone after the bigger foreign fish that own multiple tracts of land. But they well work their way down to grandma and grandpa from Essex.

I have a good friend who lives in Hua Hin, and I know many guys who own nice homes there. These are law abiding tax paying citizens who do nothing but contribute to the Thai economy and mind their own business.

Going after them is multiple levels beyond ignorant, and something I would expect from a person who is a hateful low life like Anutin.

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
35 minutes ago, wavodavo said:

Oh yes it is !!! Who told you that rubbish.

Thought I'd try and pull a fast one. You're a better man than me ,Gunga Din!!

VBF Ruby Member

VBF

Advanced Member
22 minutes ago, timendres said:

I believe most of these folks "own" their homes on leasehold. Many "pool villas", where the house is purchased as a "leasehold". These leases are typically for 30 years. Many of these owners are retirees, and 30 years is likely to be longer than their life expectancy. These owners will not be affected by the nominee crackdown.

Honestly, I still do not understand the expat obsession with "owning" land here. Sure, if you are a younger guy living and working here, planning a career here, married to a Thai, then I can understand why you would want to "invest" in your future. But the typical retiree has no real reason to own property here.

About the 30 year leases...what about people who bought property, say 25 years ago with such a lease and the "assurance" that the lease would be renewable for another 30 years, and possibly another. I was offered such a "deal" on Phuket when I was in my late 30s. A good friend who was a trustworthy Thai lawyer advised me that such a deal was not enshrined in Thai law but merely a "custom" so I declined it. Now I'm SO glad I did!

bkk6060 Diamond Member

bkk6060

Advanced Member
41 minutes ago, timendres said:

I believe most of these folks "own" their homes on leasehold. Many "pool villas", where the house is purchased as a "leasehold". These leases are typically for 30 years. Many of these owners are retirees, and 30 years is likely to be longer than their life expectancy. These owners will not be affected by the nominee crackdown.

Honestly, I still do not understand the expat obsession with "owning" land here. Sure, if you are a younger guy living and working here, planning a career here, married to a Thai, then I can understand why you would want to "invest" in your future. But the typical retiree has no real reason to own property here.

One of the most reasonable comments on this topic I have read. Yeah, I don't get it either really why is it such a necessity? Ego and power in their minds that they can own something? Grow it.people and deal with it.

VBF Ruby Member

VBF

Advanced Member
5 minutes ago, bkk6060 said:
48 minutes ago, timendres said:

I believe most of these folks "own" their homes on leasehold. Many "pool villas", where the house is purchased as a "leasehold". These leases are typically for 30 years. Many of these owners are retirees, and 30 years is likely to be longer than their life expectancy. These owners will not be affected by the nominee crackdown.

Honestly, I still do not understand the expat obsession with "owning" land here. Sure, if you are a younger guy living and working here, planning a career here, married to a Thai, then I can understand why you would want to "invest" in your future. But the typical retiree has no real reason to own property here.

One of the most reasonable comments on this topic I have read. Yeah, I don't get it either really why is it such a necessity? Ego and power in their minds that they can own something? Grow it.people and deal with it.

I think it's more to do with how you're brought up. I'm what qualifies as a "baby-boomer" and my contemporaries all had it drummed into us how important it was to own property and that rent was wasted money - true to a point. At least now I don't have to pay rent out of my pension / investment income with my flat (which I worked to buy) having about 960 years left of its lease. I owe my situation partly to my own endeavours but partly to my parents who owned a freehold house which I inherited and which became part of my investment portfolio.

In UK modern generations just cannot afford to do what I did, as ownership is too expensive and therefore not available to be passed down.

IMO people retire to Thailand with their mindset from abroad - it can be hard to do an about turn later in life.

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
5 hours ago, mrbojangles said:

You're right. According to google, there are 5.3 million non thais living in Thailand who contribute " hundreds of billions of baht into the Thai retail, housing, and service sectors each year."

And how many of the Myanmar, Cambodian and Laotian nationals are investing as opposed to living at a basic level and sending money home?

emptypockets Platinum Member

emptypockets

Advanced Member
(edited)
3 hours ago, VBF said:

I think it's more to do with how you're brought up. I'm what qualifies as a "baby-boomer" and my contemporaries all had it drummed into us how important it was to own property and that rent was wasted money - true to a point. At least now I don't have to pay rent out of my pension / investment income with my flat (which I worked to buy) having about 960 years left of its lease. I owe my situation partly to my own endeavours but partly to my parents who owned a freehold house which I inherited and which became part of my investment portfolio.

In UK modern generations just cannot afford to do what I did, as ownership is too expensive and therefore not available to be passed down.

IMO people retire to Thailand with their mindset from abroad - it can be hard to do an about turn later in life.

Bit of a confusing post. You own a flat in Thailand or the UK?

You have a 960 year lease?

Edited by emptypockets

VBF Ruby Member

VBF

Advanced Member
(edited)
36 minutes ago, emptypockets said:

Bit of a confusing post. You own a flat in Thailand or the UK?

You have a 960 year lease?

Sorry - was a bit ambiguous 🙏

My flat is in UK - slightly omitted to mention that! It was a 999 year lease when it was built and there are about 960 years left, so effectively as good as freehold...and it's on a minimal ground rent which cannot be changed.

I have never owned property in Thailand.

Hopefully a little clearer.

Edited by VBF

KhunHeineken Diamond Member

KhunHeineken

Advanced Member
20 hours ago, freedomnow said:

If Thais have the money, they can probably own land in their name in the countries of most of the members on this forum.

Thai's don't have to have the money to own land in a foreign country, they just need the right to own land in a foreign county, and they have that right, whereas, foreigners do not have the same right here.

wavodavo Gold Member

wavodavo

Advanced Member

4 hours ago, KhunHeineken said:

Thai's don't have to have the money to own land in a foreign country, they just need the right to own land in a foreign county, and they have that right, whereas, foreigners do not have the same right here.

Every country in the world has the right to set their own rules when it comes to property. In Ausrtalia cashed up Chinese parents send their kida to Universaties and instead of them renting somewhere for them to live they buy houses or apartments which they are allowed to do.This has ruined the property market because they out bid the locals everytime and it makes it hard for them to buy one and drives up the prices. However that is legal in Australia thanks to a hopeless labour government.

4 hours ago, KhunHeineken said:

Thai's don't have to have the money to own land in a foreign country, they just need the right to own land in a foreign county, and they have that right, whereas, foreigners do not have the same rigEvery

Create an account or sign in to comment

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.