Jump to content

JBChiangRai

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    3,749
  • Joined

  • Last visited

3 Followers

Previous Fields

  • Location
    Chiang Rai

Recent Profile Visitors

8,566 profile views

JBChiangRai's Achievements

Platinum Member

Platinum Member (9/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • 10 Posts
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

6.9k

Reputation

  1. The tenant loses his deposit if he breaks the lease early, if he can find someone to takeover his lease and the landlord is agreeable then the new tenant could give him his deposit back but this would be risky as any damage done by that previous tenant would be deducted from deposit at the end of the lease. It would be far safer to start a new lease. If the tenant leaves early without providing a new tenant and he has paid 2 months deposit and it takes the landlord 2 months to find another tenant then the old tenant could not realistically expect anything back from the landlord.
  2. No it doesn't, I didn't qualify it, but if you want me to, it's 13-14 times more likely for ICE and 129/130 times more likely for HEV. Those figures are a year old now, I believe the gap has widened further (EOW will tell you it's 11 not 13 or 14).
  3. I am not sure I understand you. The ICE fire stats don't include HEV and vice-versa. The HEV fire stats don't differentiate between where the fire originated (battery vs fuel)
  4. IMHO that's a fire caused by car crash, of course it could be a parking accident, assuming the driver was female. Nonsense, I have posted statistics even better than I was claiming. I could explain the maths to you, but I don't have any crayons handy
  5. LOL This one says between 61 and 139 times more likely, will that do? Study: Hybrids Involved in More Fires Than EVs and Gas-Powered Vehicles - The Car Guide (guideautoweb.com)
  6. Been posted many, many times, these aren't the ones previously quoted, but they are close enough, here you go... Petrol and diesel cars 20 times more likely to catch fire than EVs (thedriven.io) Open Research Europe | Open Access Publishing Platform (europa.eu) You’re Wrong About EV Fires (motortrend.com) Government data show gasoline vehicles are up to 100x more prone to fires than EVs | Electrek Electric vehicle fires are very rare. The risk for petrol and diesel vehicles is at least 20 times higher (theconversation.com) How much of a fire risk are electric vehicles? | Autocar
  7. I agree, but also we should only be counting self-igniting fires otherwise it proves nothing on EV battery tech.
  8. EV owners can sleep easy in their bed knowing their car is between 14 and 130 times less likely to catch fire than an ICE car. (11 to 130 times if you are a numerically challenged dinosaur fuel worker with go faster stickers on your legacy ICE)
  9. I did say "not accidents", C+ for effort, F- for accuracy
  10. Actually, YOU are the new guy. That article is not about a fire. If you care to read the thread from the beginning that was fumes from the air conditioning system with a 12 volt system short. Try harder!
  11. You're welcome to try Error 1010 Would that be "Fire not Found" ?
  12. Yes I have, here is a list of all the EV fires in Thailand (not caused by accidents) Begin List End List
  13. EV Fires are sensitive, I am absolutely certain we have heard about any, they are exceptionally newsworthy.
×
×
  • Create New...