Chomper Higgot

I’ve made my views on this very clear. I believe he was engaging in Performative Grandstanding. The police have the power to ask anyone to move on. I’ve already criticized these powers the police have been given. I’m not on any Anti-Semitic side of anything. Your attempts to use the ‘ain’t-semantic’ slur to shut down my point of view is noted, as is the hypocrisy of you doing so while claiming to defend people’s right to voice their opinion (So long as you agree with those opinions seems to be the message).

Brace yourself. The testimony and evidence against Trump will be played down. Trump’s lawyers making laugh out loud mistakes will be played down. Trump falling asleep during the trial will be played down. One mistake, no matter how small, on the part of the Prosecutor’s lawyers will be spread all over the news, social media and this forum.

Is this something normal people in possession of a balanced mind worry about? Or is it the reserve of those who habitually bang on about immigrants and Muslims in particular?

I’m not seeking any moments of fame, not engaged in any performative grandstanding. I rather enjoy my anonymity.

A one hit wonder. He’s had his 13 minutes of fame.

I do not believe anyone has the right to block others on roads or footpaths. I believe the law is clear on that and I support that law. Heckling is an entirely different matter. We all have a right to speak and heckle. I wish that more listening and debate took place instead of heckling. I consider personal attacks and false allegations to be heckling; as a recipient of much of this behavior my own conclusion is it is a poor replacement for any kind of reasoned argument.

Thanks for the apology Yellow, far too few on all sides of the political debate will admit when they make a mistake. My comment is an observation. For a handful of years now there has been a debate on what is and is not permitted to be said on University campuses. The allegation, almost entirely from the rightwing has been that universities are censoring rightwing voices. Allegations of ‘cancel culture’ and ‘snowflakes’. Punch the term ‘You don’t have a right not to be offended’ into a search engine and it will return a flavor of that debate. Again, thank you for your decency in response to my last post.

I didn’t claim anyone was being stopped from speaking. Feel free to: 1. Quote my post(s) in which I claimed “people are being stopped from speaking”. 2. Admit you made that claim up and apologize. 3. Flush your credibility.

It’s interesting how the debate on who should be allowed to speak on University Campuses has so suddenly and diametrically flipped. Gone are the days of ‘You don’t have a right to not be offended’.

There are only 12 opinions that matter. That of the author of this opinion piece, George G. Demos is not known to be amongst them.

The people acquitted in this trial were not objecting to bogus asylum seekers being deported.

Nothing bleeding heart liberal out this Jonny. Despite the obvious warnings that he was trouble he’s been allowed to remain in the UK. He clearly had no grounds for asylum, he should have been processed and deported. Nobody objects to bogus asylum seekers being deported. A failure to manage asylum claim processing left this obviously dangerous individual in the UK. That’s the immigration issue that needs dealing with.

He wasn’t ‘imported’ he arrived without a visas, claimed asylum, a claim that was not processed. He should have been processed and deported soon after arrival. He was not, with tragic consequences. RIP his victim and condolences to his victims family. https://www.itv.com/news/tyne-tees/2024-04-25/murderer-came-to-uk-to-seek-asylum-after-drifting-around-europe-for-years

To house all those disgusting people in places of power in the entertainment, financial and political system. Help me out, I’m not seeing a downside.

Interestingly, you don’t provide a link to where you got any of that.