michael888

Thanks. Yes, thats what I'm planning to do (CW).

We dressed in business clothes.

Thanks. I will PM you. It seems people just want to ridicule my post and doubt my marriage on this forum. This website has changed I guess. Oh well.

Thanks for your reply. I'm pretty sure I have to go the the IMM office where we are living / will live, yes? If you know differnt please let me know.

What doesnt "make sense" Copernicus"? , enlighten me. What doesnt make sense? Like everyone on this forum always suggests to me - be more specific. What about this is confusing? Odd.

Thank you for your reply. This is the first I've heard of this. I researched quite a bit before going to avoid pitfalls and never came across this information. When you say, "There is no make a new appointment get a new immigration officer option", what would be the obstacle(s) and/ or repercussions for that course of action (if you know)? Thanks

Nope. This is the original application for the Non O, not an extension.

Thanks for your reply. So, many years ago it was standard (or at least you were directed to) first get a 60 day extension (to visit spouse), then apply for the Non O while on that extension?

I guess it can't hurt. I'm just concerned with getting the same IO. Or seeing her when we go to The "C" department at CW and having her overrule another IO, and /or get incensed because we didn't follow her directions. It consists of two "offices" about 3x3 meters each, with maybe 4 or 5 IOs in each office. So I think there is a good chance she would notice us if we were to give another appointment a shot. That's why I'm inquiring to find out if anyone has tried a new appointment.

Seems as such, as I haven't heard of this happening to anyone else. Hence the reason for my post. I'm baffled.

A bit more info. My wife and I are both middle-aged , we have been together for about 15 years (evidence of which was in the photos we submitted). I have worked and lived in Thailand for about 17 years, teaching most of that time (not working currently). There is no marriage "scam" going on and I'm not sure how anyone could surmise that. It didn't seem like the IO was questioning the legitimacy of our relationship/ marriage.

We did, she said 2 or 3 months. "Or" lolz

I'm on a 60 day visa exempt, already have the 30 day extension- starts neek week. No, it had nothing to do with the documents. She said they were all in order. Her entire issue was that we have only been married for 3 weeks. Her mention of approval (visa approval) if we had a child together was a totally random statement by her. Quite strange.

Nope. Original application.

What I am on about? Just stating facts to see if anyone else was ever denied a marriage visa on the grounds of "not being married long enough". Also, to find out if anyone has successfully made a new appointment after a rejection (to try an application with a new IO), and if that was successful. Not sure how I can state it any differently. I'm aware of the "visit wife" extention.