roquefort

What exactly do you disagree with in the article?

Agreed....but to replace them with what? I don't see any shining lights on the Labour front bench.

The guy with a Greek name (who may or may not be Greek, have you seen his passport?) is running a news outlet that opposes ILLEGAL immigration and is in favour of a cap on the number of legal migrants to the UK. Perfectly sensible positions which the majority of the British public agree with.

It should be obvious by now that this is how Trump operates. Throw out an outrageous statement (the more outrageous the better) and while the media hacks are all choking over their coffee, everyone starts talking about a subject which was unthinkable before he said it. It's called the Overton window and it moves every time he pulls one of these stunts.

So you think hiding their identity, or calling them "Asian" (which is demonising Indians, Thais, Japanese and Koreans) is preferable? Time to call a spade a spade.

No guilt by association? Has anyone ever been prosecuted for the cover up?

Once again trying to deny the fact that these heinous crimes were covered up by mostly Labour councils and police forces.

Brits are now extremely angry about the cover-up, thanks to Musk shedding light on the murky issues that the establishment hoped would stay in the dark. When you delve into the details of the abuse, the level of medieval barbarity is shocking in itself. But the fact that this was covered up for decades by police, local authorities and (mostly) Labour politicians so as 'not to rock the multicultural boat' has incensed the British sense of fair play. Starmer will not get out of this one unscathed. My money says he'll be consigned to the dustbin of history before the end of the year.

The enquiry was not specifically into the Pakistani rape gang scandal. It had a much broader remit and the events in towns like Rotherham, Oldham and Telford were barely mentioned, if at all. https://unherd.com/watch-listen/the-grooming-gang-fallout/ What is needed urgently is proper inquiry into who covered up these crimes and for what motives. Those culprits should be dealt with by the full force of the law.

It's the web of secretive NGOs and foundations he set up decades ago and which his money funds that peddle political influence worldwide. They have their own evil existence now, they don't need him any more.

Agreed. She was a walking PR disaster, but the basic economic ideas she was trying to implement were correct. As Rachel from accounts is now proving in spades.

She's right of course, it was the BoE's ineptitude that caused interest rates to briefly spike. They came down again pretty quickly, until 'Rachel from accounts' came along and managed to push them even higher than they were under Truss.

The CIA also set up Lee Harvey Oswald as the fall guy for JFK's assassination. The CIA is a an evil, immoral and corrupt organisation that has carried out its dirty tricks all over the world (and in the US) for the last 80 years.

Ah, the Magic Money Tree theory. Unfortunately it's not true. Most US debt is owed to foreign or domestic lenders, including banks, mutual funds and pension funds. So assuming you want your pension to continue paying out in your retirement (not to mention social security, Medicare etc) it is a huge problem. https://www.pgpf.org/article/the-federal-government-has-borrowed-trillions-but-who-owns-all-that-debt/

Ah, the Magic Money Tree theory. Unfortunately it's not true. Most US debt is owed to foreign or domestic lenders, including banks, mutual funds and pension funds. So assuming you want your pension to continue paying out in your retirement (not to mention social security, Medicare etc) it is a huge problem. https://www.pgpf.org/article/the-federal-government-has-borrowed-trillions-but-who-owns-all-that-debt/