gamb00ler

You obviously didn't let your test run long enough.

Ahhh yes... more trash advice recommending criminals and con men.... oh dear what has become of AN? Coleman's CV: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vernon_Coleman

Without a link to the Times of Israel, it's just a rumor from a known disseminator of misinformation. Current article: https://www.timesofisrael.com/us-alerted-israel-nato-to-disease-outbreak-in-china-in-november-report/

I doubt that a Dr. that graduated from a college ranked 401st in America (in anesthesiology) will be given much credence anywhere except amongst the raving loons on AN.

I bet you miss those attention grabbing headlines on the National Enquirer you used to scoop up at the grocery checkout!

You gotta lay off the Twilight Zone re-runs. You've suffered severe damage to the logic you were born with. I think you'r the AN poster with the lowest percentage of facts in ANY of your posts.....

yeah... my friend (dual Thai/US citizen) received and returned his 2024 7162 but come Feb. he was cutoff. He immediately sent a replacement and finally in May got all his missing benefits paid. The threat is real.

SSA is never forced on anyone. If you never apply they will never bother you. Perhaps you're referring to the increase offered through Delayed Retirement Credits. For each year you delay collecting benefits after reaching FRA (Full Retirement Age) you will get an extra 8% added to your benefits. You FRA is 67, assuming you're 63 now. You would get 100% at 67, 108% at 68, etc. You will get max benefits if you wait until age 70. Many experts say if you don't need the benefits now, then wait until you do or age 70. Due to aging and health decline it is better to have higher benefits when you're older.

LOL and we're supposed to believe all your fiction.... we all know you're really trying to hide that you are in fact owl sees all ..... you're not being honest. You are a proven deceiver and also disrespectful to the intelligence of other AN posters by trying to continue the denial and deception. You reputation is nada, rien, zilch, zippo. Time to retire to TT chat room and take your 19th century medical misinformation with you.

LOL .... the Koch postulates were written before anyone knew virus's existed. Koch was busy in the 1880's. The first discovery and naming of a virus was a decade later. You're grasp of medical science and history is warped by some personal flaw.... you just crave attention and this is an easy way to garner it. Here's the real history of how virology got started: In 1892, Dmitri Ivanovsky used filters that had pores small enough to retain bacteria to show that sap from a diseased tobacco plant remained infectious to healthy tobacco plants despite having been filtered. Martinus Beijerinck called the filtered, infectious substance a "virus" and this discovery is considered to be the beginning of virology. From : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_virology

An uninvolved reader could more easily deduce the possible reasons for your failure. I'm sure you never will consider or have ever considered the possibility that your 'research' is misdirected or seriously flawed. That is a much more reasonable explanation than 'there is no evidence'. You're so devoted to your opinion that you can't see the forest for the trees.

Please explain the logic of how declining to vote stops the continued election of poor candidates? I think you merely strung together words that illustrate your feelings but make no sense.

Grandma Suzzanne is definitely spreading toxic information.... if she succeeds in bamboozling anyone into skipping vaccination she should suffer for her transgressions. Arsenic does become toxic at a certain level. I'm aware that the healthier types of rice that include the bran and the germ do contain higher levels of arsenic. DDT is mostly banned already for agricultural use. It can still enter the food chain but in much reduced quantities for decades now. Do you have links to peer reviewed studies linking these specific toxins to recent cases that are normally attributed to a viral infection? Otherwise your oft-repeated claims are all just rumors. No sane person is disputing that those are toxic chemicals. But without data linking them to cases that knowledge is only tangential.

I criticized your post's content and the reputation of the authors you are always flogging. That's well within the AN guidelines and is not an attack on your person. You must have mentioned the Roytas book at least 6 times. That seems to show a commercial intent, does it not? I believe that intent contravenes AN guidelines and it should earn you a well deserved vacation... an owl would remember how that works.

I tried 90 day online Friday, July 11 and wasn't expecting a response until Monday. I supplied all the data that I included on the last 3 successful applications. On Sunday got a rejection saying I was missing my visa expiration data and my phone number. Once a couple of years ago I had entered my extension expiration date, but never my visa expiration (5 years ago now). Imm. seems erratic on what is required. Neither of those fields have the red asterisk signifying that they're required. Just a heads up. I use CM office for my extensions and in-person 90 day reports.