gamb00ler

You're a fine one to be talking about not seeing the truth. You're fixated on 1890's medical science and ignoring 130+ years of progress. Koch was good for his time but sadly outdated now.

I don't deny that there are some cases of injury from vaccinations. I do believe that many other prophylactic practices also cause harm but the science shows the net benefit is better than without. The history of vaccination has made the determination of value quite clear. Do you use your turn signals? Some harm from their use is possible. Often, in Thailand motorcycle riders forget to turn them off and other drivers may make a bad decision based on the rider's mistaken usage. Let's ban turn indicators!

is it considered to be a lie when you deny that you posted under a previous account name? You yourself provided the evidence that you're the same person. No detectives needed.

Sociopaths also have reasons. They're just not what sane people see as 'reasonable'.

Alter AI only provides guidance in forming a query, it does not have its own LLM. It uses the mainstream AI provider's LLMs.

I don't think it's very considerate of them to encroach upon your specialty. They should stick to their lane.

In that case why post the preamble... just post the link to the specific tweet. If you think the preamble is meaningless... why waste the reader's time?

You posted a reference to a tweet that made silly claims. Did you refer to that tweet because you also agree that it contains nothing meaningful? That would go against the grain of every other post you've made on AN. I explained why the tweet was pure nonsense. Do you agree the new CDC statement merely states that it is impossible to prove a such a negative assertion? That statement covers material learned in freshmen logic class.

A typical failure in simple logic that is your trademark. The phrase tweet you quoted does not mean what you seem to claim. I hope your job in entertainment doesn’t require an excellent understanding of English… because…. that is definitely NOT an ability exhibited in your posts on AN. The quoted tweet implies some earth shattering admission by the CDC. Such is definitely NOT the case. The CDC merely admitted that they cannot prove a negative assertion. Which is absolutely true. Read the following: Proving a negative statement is generally difficult or impossible when it requires an exhaustive search of an unbounded or infinite domain (e.g., "ghosts do not exist"). However, it is quite easy to prove negatives within closed, finite systems (e.g., "there is no orange in this bag"). The difficulty lies in universality, not negativity. Key Aspects of Proving Negatives: The Problem of Universality: It is nearly impossible to prove a general negative statement because it requires examining every single possibility in the universe, which is rarely practical. The change in the CDC’s statement, merely recognizes the above.

If you weren't such a prolific purveyor of mis-information it would be easy to take that route. I never see you offer any actual simple but accurate help on AN. You seemed to be locked in a battle with the status quo in science despite not having any weapon.

An order of magnitude reduction in time to find solutions to the difficult questions about protein folding. NOT for the science phobic, google phobic, AI phobic AN members.... From one of the most interesting science based YouTube channels:

A well written (for lay people) article for those interested in the how/why mRNA COVID vaccines are not doing the damage often claimed by the anti-vaxers. https://med.stanford.edu/news/insights/2023/07/mrna-vaccine-spike-protein-differs-from-viral-version.html

I'm sure you're aware of the value I assign to anything you write.

You're even more clueless than I thought. Look up the similarities and differences between analogy and allegory. AI can help with that. You really are quite poor in English. Try your 1st language and then use a good translation app.

and... you're still clueless that his post was entirely allegorical and has nothing to do with water. It's sad, really