Johnniey

^^

I think he's a good president but don't support him in any way. I just like a fair contest.

Also, I'm not from the US, and support none of the corrupt politicians.

On 7/6/2018 at 10:21 PM, skippy121 said:

 

 

am planning to apply in december once I am married,

 

Worked here nearly 5 years with continuous Non-B and work permit

 

Tax paid all those years, current salary 81k , previous year 76, previous year 72, previous 65

 

Higher certificate but not degree, microsoft certs

 

age 40 soon

 

no language skills,

 

 

 

 

 

Doesn't take Einstein to be able to interpret this as meaning he  is not married yet. 

34 minutes ago, greenchair said:

Your wife  can be with you throughout the process and she can translate. 

Relax. It'll be fun. 

He's not married !

3 minutes ago, skippy121 said:

I understand that and understand that if not married, you get less points for certain things,

 

what I am asking is that can my wife act as a translater for me even if I do not get any extra points for being married.

 

Easier to wait 3 years than go the alternative route, which is getting Permanent Residency first.

1 hour ago, skippy121 said:

ok so this is the question,

 

I understand that if married under 3 years, I cannot qualify for more points for lower salary etc

 

but can my wife still be in the interviews with me to help with translation, am sure I could take 10 points from knowledge of thailand with a translater

You have to wait until you have been married for 3 years before you can apply. Otherwise, many people would get married just to become a citizen, then get divorced.

31 minutes ago, skippy121 said:

same as back home,

 

you have certificate = 1 year , diploma = 2 years , BA = 3 years

 

question is does a 1 year certificate count as graduated from a thai establishment

What is a "certificate"?

BTW, you would get 10 points for your age.

Also 5 points for personality!

learn to read Thai and you'd get 8 points pretty easily for the multiple choice test.

Point for length of stay in Thailand, you're sorted. 

16 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

You mean like when replying to some people, it's best to keep your answer simple.

No.

1 minute ago, bristolboy said:

Your incisive questioning has put me on the ropes. I give in, GI.

No, I don't support impeachment. I'd rather the next Congress, if the House goes Democratic, and in the rather more unlikely case that the Senate does,  start legislating popular bills that Trump and other Republicans stifle. Show the country what real populism looks like, not this counterfeit of making the powerful more powerful and the middle and working classes weaker Even in the exceedinglly unlikely event that Trump gets voted out of office by the Senate, that would only mean President don't-leave-me-alone-with-a-woman Pence, who actually seems to actually believe in all the causes of the social conservatives and then some.

Thanks, a simple, "no" would have sufficed.

5 minutes ago, heybruce said:

I realize you'd love to make this topic about anything other than Trump, but stop claiming my posts say things they don't.

 

You said Trump supporters are less intelligent that Clinton ones, even giving a website saying such. There are similar ones saying different races have lower IQs, so what does this prove? Your vote is worth more?

2 minutes ago, The manic said:

Do you support prosecution of HRC, Bill and and investigation into the corrupt Clinton fund? Stop the C and keep to related topics.

This is off topic.

I asked the guy a simple question which is related to the thread title. He refuses to answer it for some reason.

5 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Oh no! I knew that Thaivisa had moderators but not that they had a Grand Inquisitor.

I'm going to settle back in my comfy chair and steel myself as best I can.

 

"Why the need for evidence."

Why are you citing Trump's motto?

 

Stop the BS, do you support impeachment? Hardly a difficult question. If you don't want anyone to know, just say so.

Keep this on topic please.

1 minute ago, heybruce said:

Actually my post was far less offense and arrogant than yours.  I made no comment on the intelligence of Trump voters, even though research on their average education levels would have made that easy.    http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/

Wow,  you'll be saying black people are less intelligent than white next?

Would you think a fair democracy would be to give intelligent voters like yourself 2 votes and a lower IQ person 1 vote?

3 minutes ago, heybruce said:

In 1979 President Jimmy Carter brokered a peace treaty between Israel and Egypt that was, in part, bought with the promise of significant aid from the US.  Since then Israel and Egypt have been the two biggest recipients of US aid.  I'm not aware of any significant change in the amount of aid to Israel since Trump took office but was unable to find current figures.

The only US president I liked. I admired JFK, until I found out the truth about him.

Trump promised Israel $13 billion over the next 10 years. next year an increase of $200 million.

3 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

I guess you've got evidence to show that I support impeachment which I'd like to believe you will provide. But given your sorry track record so far, I'm losing hope that you have any genuine acquaintance with facts at all.

Simple -  Do you support impeachment?

Why the need for evidence.

2 minutes ago, rhodie said:

Absolutely not. But if you look at the time you are spending on this thread, and the fact that Trump is still in office, I would say you are wasting your time. Nothing personal. Just an observation. Good luck with the impeachment and keep on trucking.

Must be like 10 hours a day. What a life. Why not go to the learn Thai forum or play golf or anything? You'll make yourself a frustrated bitter blinkered boring poster that only Bruce and Jing will love.

1 minute ago, bristolboy said:

Still going there. At least my comments are pertinent to the topic. Except of course, when they'r derailed by someone who has to resort to personal comments. You know, it's not obligatory for you to post irrelevancies. You can give it a rest and devote your valuable time to benefiting humanity.

Nonsense, you posts are nothing to do with the impeachment of the great US leader. I tain't happening. Your posts are just nasty, vindictive antiTrump sore losing tripe.

2 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Based on what criteria? And I guess since you've got nothing germane to say, you'll go with the personal comments.

Nice to know how someone can have enough time to post 50 posts a day on an internet website. Maybe Jingthing has made some anti trump bots!!!555

1 minute ago, heybruce said:

BS.  Intelligent people who care about the US were appalled when the competent candidate lost to the incompetent one.

What arrogance. And what a sore loser - blaming peoples intelligence for voting for the president. 

Just now, bristolboy said:

In what posts would that be? Please share them with me to show that you are truly sorry about wasting my time.

He's confusing you with Jingting. You haven't been a member here for 18 months.

2 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

Another note to Johnley: 1332 is not what 80,000 looks like.

1332 posts in 2 months is comparable. Are you retired in the sticks with nothing else to do?

1 minute ago, bristolboy said:

Actually, I wasn't aware that I wrote that anywhere. But I'm sure you wouldn't say such a thing without having evidence to back it up. But on the off chance that's not the case, why are you wasting my time?

He wasn't talking to you, and actually neither was I. 

Some self-importance issues?

5 minutes ago, bristolboy said:

I don't watch TV either. But I do have access to something called the  Internet and something else called Google.

Try this search term. "Do Evangelicals support Trump"

 

Interesting. I guess trump is a lot more spiritual than his opponents. What a strange phenomenon! 

2 minutes ago, rhodie said:

Well, are you? You have spent 18 months telling all and sundry the world is going to end soon under Trump. Still waiting for it to happen.

lol, rather ironic a guy with 80,000 posts telling you this.

I can't wait to see his reaction if Trump gets re-elected.

10 minutes ago, rhodie said:

Blah, blah, blah. Trump will be gone in a month. No, wait, 2 months, no wait, 1 year. It is now 18 months down the track. The world has not ended. In fact in the big scheme of things, the world is probably moving along quite nicely, even with Trump. And he will be there in another 2 years. And he may even be there in another 6 years. And this thread will die like all the previous ones, and a few new ones will be created. And who knows, he may even be impeached. Who cares. Life will continue and we will all live happily ever after. Come on guys. Get a life. Sheesh!   Sorry, I just had to.

Some people's egos have been really hurt bad when their perfect, innocent, Hillary lost. It's like their only cause for living now to watch Trump,s every move and criticize it.

2 minutes ago, heybruce said:

 

Evangelicals support Israel, they believe that the return of a Jewish state precedes the second coming of Christ.  Supporting Israel is an easy way for Trump to lock in the support of the Evangelicals.

Easy maybe but rather expensive. Didn't the previous presidents do the same?

Are you saying most evangelicals are Trump supporters? What about most normal Christians?

Sorry, I don't watch TV.