Jump to content

Acemaker

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    792
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Acemaker

  1. 16 hours ago, Jingthing said:

    You're obsessed with labeling other people. What's most important is how people identify themselves. There are people that are truly bisexual, they usually know that themselves, but not everyone that has had sex sometime in their lives with both sexes is bisexual. NOT EVEN CLOSE.

     

    There are times where it's important to know about genders of sex partners regardless of labeling. Such as the category MSM (Men that have sex with men). This is something medical professionals are concerned about because there are specific health risks with that. But just being a MSM in a recent time frame doesn't mean the person either is gay or bi or identifies as gay or bi for life. For examples, prison environments, gay for pay, short term fluidity, etc.

    Pass me the Sick Bucket !   :sick:

  2. On 5/1/2018 at 3:05 PM, Krataiboy said:

    Nothing particularly revelationary about this Pink piece. Numerous surveys have shown that many, if not most, men who identify as heterosexual have a sexual experience with another man at some time in their lives. The same goes for women, only more so.

     

    Such activity is hardly surprising. How else can an individual discover where they stand on the spectrum of human sexual activity, with all that implies in terms of having lasting, committed relationships?

     

    The author of one of the studies cited the Pink article, Ritch C. Savin-Williams, has written extensively in support of his conviction that nobody is one hundred percent heterosexual, including this fascinating Time magazine article:

     

    http://time.com/5026092/mostly-straight-sexual-identity-bisexual-gay/

    Thats total, Bolox, speaking for yourself here, me thinks.  

    • Thanks 1
  3. 17 hours ago, Pattaya46 said:

    And who decided that ?? :unsure:

    Maybe it's the way it works where you come from, 

    but where I come from we only tip when the service is better than expected.

    If the service is just ok/normal, then no tip.

    Australians dont Tip, never have to my knowledge, unless you promise not to Grass them up for Ball Tampering.   :giggle:

  4. On 4/28/2018 at 8:41 PM, Hummin said:

    As long you know it is gambling, I respect that, and as you say, we never know tomorow, that is what i have to consider as well as everyone else. Spread risk is my idea, but of course no fantasy return, but Im in for long term, and have what I need. 

    Dont miss this genuinely Gold backed, Last chance ends tomorrow, May 2nd at 6p.m. EST.

     

    https://karatbank.io/?ref=2470&sub=my_campaign

  5. On 4/22/2018 at 11:22 AM, Inepto Cracy said:

    I did, at the end of last year as a gamble.

    I made a lot of money back , when I got cold feet and the price had risen substantially, I called it quits.

    I now have money I did not have before.

    Would I ever do it again, I don't think so.

    I was lucky but you could loose everything in a matter of minutes, not even days.

    Dont miss this, last chance ends 6 p.m. EST Tomorrow May 2nd.

     

    https://karatbank.io/?ref=2470&sub=my_campaign

  6. 59 minutes ago, EnlightenedAtheist said:

    Obviously she has some mental challenge or some other challenges (incl. the darken visor idea). Maybe she was tired or sleepy (Some people must wake up too early to work). Maybe she drank the night before. There are many possibilities outside the most obvious one.

     

    I find some  of the comments by people making fun of the person's inability sad and retarded. Ironically, they might be just as brainless as her (if straight and emotional intelligence matter).  Some describe the video as funny. I wonder if they were sad that she did not kill herself. 

     

    The more I stay on these forums the more I feel that some comment to make themselves look and feel better. Like I say --and I repeat for the ones who did not get it then first time-- I think some of them are challenged too.

    Please feel Free to leave this Forum anytime , you will not be missed.   :thumbsup:

    • Haha 1
  7. 3 hours ago, Dexlowe said:

    Hate to be blunt about this, but it sounds like you've kissed your money goodbye. There's no contract, apparently, and even if there was, it would take years to settle in court (presuming the worker is still around). And the police aren't interested as they consider it a civil matter. 

     

    This has happened to a friend of mine -- his substantial amount of money was spent on gambling debts and the contractor just laughed in his face and walked away.

    I would have dressed up as a Ladyboy one Night and thrown him off a Balcony.

  8. 2 hours ago, chrisinth said:

    Just so your assumptions don't overwhelm, let me say that maybe, living here made me a better person. But how does one know? How do you guess what you would have done different if you were still living in your own country?

     

    What I do know for sure is that Thailand, or rather living in Thailand, probably saved my life through lifestyle changes made easier through the support of my better half who has been beside me for the last 19 years as my wife. I doubt I would have found that support living in my home country, but again, who knows for sure?

     

    As long as living here provides some adventure, keeps the mind active and provides physical challenges, it is the country for me, regardless if it did in fact change me or not........................:thumbsup:

    :violin:

    • Haha 2
  9. 5 hours ago, Antonymous said:

    Here are what the experts say (from Do birds spread disease?):

    • On the subject of pigeons and disease, Dr. Nina Marano (an epidemiologist) states that “Pigeons are no more filthy than any other wild bird or animal,” while Dr. Arturo Casadevall (an expert in pigeon faeces) states, “Pigeons are no different than other animals. When it comes to spreading disease, they don’t stand out.” Blechman, Andrew D. (2006). Pigeons: The fascinating saga of the world’s most revered and reviled bird. Grove Press, New York.
    • Mike Everett, spokesman for the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds said, in The Big Issue Magazine, February 2001: “The whole ‘rats with wings’ thing is just emotive nonsense. There is no evidence to show that they (pigeons) spread disease.”
    • The UK’s Chief Veterinary Officer, when addressing the House of Lords in 2000 on the issue of intimate human contact with the then 7,000-8,000 pigeons feeding in Trafalgar Square, was asked if this represented a risk to human health. The Chief Veterinary Officer told The House that in his opinion it did not.
    • Charlotte Donnelly, an American bird control expert told the Cincinnati Environment Advisory Council in her report to them: “The truth is that the vast majority of people are at little or no health risk from pigeons and probably have a greater chance of being struck by lightening than contracting a serious disease from pigeons.”
    • Guy Merchant, Director of The Pigeon Control Advisory Service (PiCAS International) says, when talking about the transmission of disease by pigeons: “If we believed everything we read in the media about the health risks associated with pigeons, and the farcical propaganda distributed by the pest control industry, we would never leave our homes. The fact of the matter is that there is probably a greater risk to human health from eating intensively farmed supermarket chicken and eggs, or having contact with domestic pets such as cats, dogs and caged birds, than there is from contact with pigeons.”
    • David A Palmer (B.V.Sc., M.R.C.V.S) said in an article entitled ‘Pigeon Lung Disease Fatality and Health Risk from Ferals’: “Obviously, since all these Allergic Extrinsic Alveolitis disease syndromes rely on the involved person having a very specific allergy before any disease, involving respiratory distress and very unusually death, can possibly be seen, it really makes absolute nonsense for a popular daily newspaper to suggest that pigeons present a health hazard and presumably need eliminating for the well-being of the nation’s health.”
    • David Taylor BVMS FRCVS FZS: “In 50 years professional work as a veterinary surgeon I cannot recall one case of a zoonosis in a human that was related to pigeons. On the other hand I know of, and have seen, examples of human disease related to contact with dogs, cats, cattle, monkeys, sheep, camels, budgies, parrots, cockatoos, aquarium fish and even dolphins, on many occasions.”
    • The Center for Disease Control in Atlanta, the New York City Department of Health, and the Arizona Department of Health all agree that diseases associated with pigeons present little risk to people. “We have never documented a pigeon to human transmission in the state of Arizona,” said Mira J Leslie, Arizona’s state public health veterinarian.
    • In response to questions about the effects of pigeons on human health, in 1986 the Association of Pigeon Veterinarians issued a statement that concludes, “…to our knowledge, the raising, keeping, and the exercising of pigeons and doves represents no more of a health hazard than the keeping of other communal or domestic pets.”

    As you can see, pigeons pose little threat to us. However, if you aren’t convinced, please visit the following websites: http://www.picasuk.com/index.html and http://www.urbanwildlifesociety.org/zoonoses/

    Who gives a Flying Rat about the Stats, there Vermin end of.

×
×
  • Create New...
""