Tippaporn

One other point about your support of the WHO as the world organisation meant to keep the world safe from pandemics. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic The World Health Organization (WHO) on March 11, 2020, has declared the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak a global pandemic (1). [. . .] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7569573/#:~:text=Maurizio Vanelli,-1Editors of&text=Received 2020 Mar 12%3B Accepted,Mar 13%3B Issue date 2020.&text=The World Health Organization (WHO,a global pandemic (1). Seems to me that by the time the WHO finally got around to publicly declaring a pandemic it was already common knowledge globally. Johnnie come lately and they got paid for what? Also, there's the question of what the WHO did to mitigate the Covid-19 pandemic as it was ongoing. I know what they didn't do. Which would have been to take the common sense action of assembling health experts from multiple fields with various backgrounds from around the globe to bang heads together to seek remedies and mitigation strategies. I'd love if someone could point me to any actions that the WHO took during the pandemic to decrease deaths and to find solutions. Seems to me that the WHO is little more than a global bureaucratic body sucking money unto itself from every member nation to enrich the bureaucrats running the place whilst having nothing of real value to offer. I'm sure some folks will strongly disagree with me but then please show me the real, concrete, evidence based, numbers based benefits that the WHO has produced for the world. I'm from Missouri, the Show Me State.

Old normal: Pandemics are rare. New normal: Pandemics are commonplace. List of epidemics and pandemics https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_epidemics_and_pandemics Seems to me that naturally occuring pandemics are a rarity. But if Covid-19 was man made and accidentally released from a lab then that doesn't count as naturally occuring. I'd say that anyone fretting about the next naturally occuring pandemic has swallowed too much fear porn.

Best post in this thread so far. https://assets.aseannow.com/forum/uploads/emoticons/thumbsup.gif

Update. Bill Ackman Steps Up, Joins Dave Portnoy in Christmas Miracle for Struggling Small Business [. . .] After hearing about the story, hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman joined the moving efforts to help the small businessman. Ackman encouraged government officials to stop dragging their feet on a liquor license and fast-track the process to keep Tiny Brick Oven open and allow it to thrive. [. . .] Ackman also donated $10,000 to Fagg’s online Pay it Forward fundraiser which, at the time of writing, has already reached over $70,000. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/bill-ackman-steps-up-joins-dave-pornoy-christmas/ https://assets.aseannow.com/forum/uploads/monthly_2024_12/image.thumb.jpeg.b32462b9278882d2e39380c01d31824c.jpeg

As so much of western society seems to be hellbent on abandoning all sense of morality and creating a world in which anything goes then it's always nice to run across instances which restore a faith in mankind's ability to maintain their connection to those values which are conducive to creating a much more ideal world. Merry Christmas to all. At least to those who understand it's meaning. For the rest, ah well. The good news is that it's impossible to totally disconnect from your source nature. Try as you may. Barstool Sports Founder Dave Portnoy Saves Small Baltimore Pizzeria From Closing on Christmas Day Dave Portnoy, the founder of Barstool Sports and the man behind the viral “One Bite” pizza reviews, has taken on a new role as a holiday hero for a struggling Baltimore pizzeria. Tiny Brick Oven, a veteran-owned establishment in Baltimore’s Inner Harbor, was on the verge of closing its doors forever—until Portnoy stepped in. [. . .] https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/12/barstool-sports-founder-dave-portnoy-saves-small-baltimore/

And you can dissemble any way you want. It's okay.

But it's not the case of you merely repeating what factcheck.apr has to say about People's Voice. Once again you're trying to change the story so that you can avoid conceding the point. Your words. Your statement of "fact." Your smear. The meaning of those words being wholly unambiguous. Just own up. That's all I'm asking of you.

So I am not stupid enough to think I know more than people who have spent 20 years studying the subject. 😁 No one has been studying the CDC redefining "vaccine" for 20 years. Do you know enough to understand the question GF asked you? Do you believe the Covid "vaccines" are vaccines or mrRNA gene editing therapies? BREAKING: Proof CDC Changed Definition of ‘Vaccine’ Because Prior Definition Allowed People “To Claim the COVID-19 Vaccine is Not a Vaccine” Here's the definition the CDC used on 26 August 2021: Vaccine-- “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease.” Here is the new definition: Vaccine-- “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/breaking-proof-cdc-changed-definition-vaccine-prior-definition-allowed-people-claim-covid-19-vaccine-not-vaccine/ Emails Reveal CDC Changed Definition of “Vaccine” and “Vaccination” Because Their Experimental COVID Shots Didn’t Work as Advertised https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/11/emails-reveal-cdc-changed-definition-vaccine-vaccination-experimental-covid-shots-didnt-work/ 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Acknowledges Plaintiffs’ Claim that COVID-19 mRNA Jab is NOT a Vaccine, But a Therapeutic https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/breaking-9th-circuit-court-appeals-rules-mrna-covid/ Dr. Stefan Oelrich, President of Bayer Pharmaceuticals, admits MNRA Vaccines ARE Gene Therapy

Good idea if you're a qualified scientist. Hard to do your homework if you just have google to rely on. Correction: Impossible to "do your homework if you just have google to rely on." Google's search engine ensures that you are unable to access opposing information. You don't necessarily need to be a qualified scientist to understand what's true and what's false in the world of science. That's an engineered fallacy that works to force people's reliance for the truth on experts and cancels people's ability to know the truth using their own resourcefulness. Which, BTW, is quite vast.

Thanks, dinsdale. I didn't even bother checking the date of the linked article and incorrectly assumed it was current. Here's a link to the crowd sourced analysis of the court ordered Pfizer documents for anyone's reference. This is the only comprehensive analysis of those documents being performed that I am aware of. One thing is certain. https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-and-moderna-reports/ The MSM hasn't bothered doing any investigations into those documents. Gee, I wonder why?

I did not claim the article to be fake news. I question the accuracy of the article. Sorry, not buying your backpedaling, Hawaiian. Here's what you wrote: Your source is known for producing conspiracy theories and fake news. You didn't question the article. You smeared the source, People's Voice. No mention of the article or it's content whatsoever. Now your story changes. I'll lay aside the entire issue of fact checkers, which is a whole topic unto itself. But I will analyse the article's "debunking" . . . to an extent. "The document cited in the articles contains nothing to indicate the vaccine was linked to deaths." I dunno about you but I tire of articles which point to documents without ever reproducing those documents in the article or providing links to said documents. To be fair, I'll likewise fault People's Voice. I prefer to read any document myself rather than assume, or take on pure faith, a third party's interpretation is correct. ". . . Pfizer spokeswoman Dervila Keane told AFP." "FDA spokeswoman Alison Hunt told AFP . . ." Now Pfizer is accused of alleged criminality. The FDA is similarly suspect as a governmental agency that has become corrupted to the degree that they can no longer be unquestioningly trusted. What I find simply astounding is that the "fact checker" "debunked" the claim of Pfizer hiding data by asking only both Pfizer and the FDA for their side of the story. For one, how can anyone legitimately take the word of either entity at face value without fact checking their stories? This is what you appear to be doing. For another, if a fact checker were to do honest and unbiased work then they would also include the other side of the story. But they don't. And the why is perhaps a question you've never asked yourself but a whole lot of other people ask. Only so that they don't get caught with their pants around their ankles sometime later. Apparently, according to you, if one doesn't accept the Pfizer and FDA explanations as gospel truth and questions it then that mere innocent, though exceedingly prudent, act of questioning is what makes them a conspiracy theorist. Which is what you accuse People's Voice of engaging in. Again, in your own words: "Your source is known for producing conspiracy theories and fake news." My conclusion is that your view here is not at all balanced. In fact, it appears to be skewed towards a particular bias. And unbalanced and biased views are rarely representative of any real truth. I suggest you question more and investigate all sides of an issue before drawing gospel truth conclusions. Just trying to help you avoid any future where you get caught with your drawers around your ankles and then have to perform endless mea culpas in public.

If that's all you've got for an argument then you've failed. Badly. You must have missed the memo. Labeling sources as "conspiracy theorists" doesn't work anymore. The con that's been perpetrated has been exposed to an extent that makes it undeniable. Throwing out the term "conspiracy theory" is part of the con. Instead, why don't you argue against the facts the article puts forth. That Pfizer, from their own documentation, hid fatality data from regulators. Again, that is a fact that comes from Pfizer's own documentation. Give me your best argument as to what makes that fake news. I doubt you'll come up with one. The truth hurts too much.

Excellent post, rumak. Well said. And truthful.

That's not all of it, though. As with so many institutions these days, there's an element of outright corruption that needs to be accounted for, too.

At least that's how it's supposed to work. It's up to you to find out whether or not it really works as advertised and not simply assume that it's a perfect world. Do your own homework and you might end up feeling scandalized.

Yeah, real convincing. Too low class for YouTube apparently so it's on Bitchute? A bunch of clips with a heavy metal(?) sound track? Not remotely a source of information. If you have put this forward as an argument for anything I gotta consider that when I evaluate else anything you might say. That was an excellent soundtrack. The clip got the point across. Endless unexplained "sudden deaths" which had never happened before. That's a fact. To those with common sense they take that as a flashing warning sign. Sounds like your attitude is like the person on the beach who saw all the water recede just before the tsunami hit not thinking anything of it.

Gee, Halloween is next Thursday and after reading that horror story I can skip the slasher movie I was going to watch this weekend. That would be mild in comparison. Thanks for the spine tingling tale of fright. It's true what you say that the banks own your money once you deposit it with them. I've learned that during the '08 financial crisis. Only in a crooked system can that arrangement be codified.

I'm in possession of his 5 laptops. He attempted to write a will and listed all of his assets. So that part is easy. I'll be confronting the perp after we have an administrator. I don't think he'll balk at returning any monies he embezzled. The consequences if charged and convicted are not worth 50,000 baht. I'm sure he can do the math.

This topic is an aspect of this topic, but needs to be separate. The back story: the deceased has lived in Thailand since 1991 with only two return trips to the UK in those 33 years. Problem: Back in the eighties he had bought an undetermined number of shares of British Airways and Rolls Royce. He had opened an account at NatWest for the specific purpose of receiving the dividends from his shares. He then forgot about the account. Fast forward to 2 January 2020 when he contacted NatWest requesting his lost account number. Now fast forward to 13 May 2020 when he sent a follow up email to NatWest requesting that someone give the matter attention. That's all the information I have. The question is, what course of action to take for both the NatWest account and locating the shares.

Wise advice, thank you. Fortunately there are no claims being made by either his sister nor his nephew. According to Thai law nephews have zero standing to claims of inheritance. And he's stated emphatically that he has no legal representation on this matter in Thailand. There will be no opposition in court.

He was an absentee father. 5,000 baht per year for her birthday. That was it. And that lasted only up until she was six or seven. He had been largely invisible since. I won't judge him as there's a lot of complexity. Humans are complex creatures. I get that and so hold nothing against him. I grant he made some poor decisions but I also grant that he did the best he knew how. That's good enough for me. I realise, too, that I myself live in a glass house, LOL.

One estranged sister residing in the UK and what appears to be a spiv banker nephew in Hong Kong. The estate is not worth any effort by the EWB nephew and he's made that clear. He wouldn't even come in for the funeral of his "beloved" uncle. The value of the estate is worth pursuing.

The Thai bank accounts were immediately frozen. Two 25,000 baht withdrawals were made on the day of the father's death. That money needs to be returned, either willingly or not. I believe it will be willingly as the detrimental consequences far outweigh the paltry gain.

I'm late with all of my responses because this has been all consuming since the father's death. The funeral was arranged with the help of friends and took place on the 13th. The father had set money aside for the funeral and hospital so that is all behind us. The pension is with Zurich. We've contacted them to let them know the policy holder is deceased and they now await for an administrator to be appointed in order to settle the account.

Thanks, ddedave. So far so good. No doubt it involves a lot of running around and it's a huge learning experience but nothing that's too formidable that we haven't been able to handle ourselves.