So you object to the word "blocked"?
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jul/13/winning-thailand-candidate-for-pm-blocked-from-power-pita-limjaroenrat&ved=2ahUKEwiJo8aLwLmMAxUiQkEAHYqIPdoQFnoECBIQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2av9z15Qkp7R9-3XoUV752
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-10141/
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-66219602&ved=2ahUKEwiJo8aLwLmMAxUiQkEAHYqIPdoQFnoECCwQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2F3Mkmyj5QATHrVY7hOWPg
Seems I'm not the only one who thinks the term "blocked" is appropriate.
Would you prefer "rejected by an un-elected senate"?