Jump to content

thehelmsman

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,947
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by thehelmsman

  1. 3 hours ago, kannot said:

    Seems everyone else thinks you "must" get a reward and that without one being given makes you some kind of scrooge, just decency to give it back imo, "Thank you" is  good  enough.

    Thank You is fine for a book, reading glasses and such. Don't all the thai guys wear man purses? How about cargo pockets? 200K doesn't take up much room. In any society, it would be appropriate to "give" a handsome tip her.

  2. 3 minutes ago, Nord X said:

    You can dress it up anyway you like. If she had kept it she would be a thief, and if caught she would be prosecuted as a thief, 'Finders keepers, loosers [sic] weepers' would just not cut it in court. It's called theft by finding and using your logic you could just go around stealing any unattended object and come out with the phrase 'finders keepers, losers weepers' and take ownership of the object. Sorry that is not how society works.

     

    Like I originally said she's obviously not a thief.

    Too many ifs. She didn't take it while his back was turned. He left it and walked away. Sum num naa works here.

  3. 17 minutes ago, Becker said:

    No, the grown-ups are pissed that a large part of the population thought it was a good idea to cut off their nose to spite their face by electing a particularly evil and ignorant man-child as president. It's like giving the finger to democracy.

    Pathetic. Sorry, but there's no other way to describe it.

    Blame the Dems for this one. Anyone but Hillary won this for Trump.

  4. I'll bet all the Trump "haters" don't mind the stock markets soaring high.  No matter how hard you beat your drums, the working folks in America care about things that matter to them.

     

    You don't think all the trouble that's going on right now was instigated by Russia. I don't mean hacking the election, I mean starting fake news and watching the Americans going at each other. And the Dems are falling for it, or don't care.

     

    Just because "Trump" doesn't kiss the worlds ass, he's a bad leader?

  5. 31 minutes ago, fordguy61mi said:

    Some people, men and women, are more affectionate than others. And since most public affection is frowned upon in Thailand, you're pretty much stuck with handholding or the occasional hand on their shoulder. When I first visited Thailand and met my gf she let me know right away that touching her inner thigh in Thailand in public was a no-no. I think the OP may be using this post to bash the romantics a little bit. I don't really care. I'll continue to hold my girl's hand when I want. Sometimes I do, sometimes you wouldn't even know we were together. What does it matter anyway? If it bugs you look the other way.

    On the contrary, depending on the hand holders, I am amused.

  6. Lots of different opinions. Some guys are just "hand holders" and some guys aren't, at least not in crowded public places. We always have our 5 yr. old with us and our time is spent on her.

     

    Kind of like the idea of wife walking 3 steps behind me but that would interfere with her holding umbrella for me.

     

    Sometimes we are behind an old farang hand holder and my wife will start to hold my hand with a devilish grin and we both laugh.

  7. 29 minutes ago, ben2talk said:

    Strange post.

     

    Taken literally - who finds it necessary to do it EVERYWHERE?  

    Surely nobody does.

    Occasionally it can be very reassuring.

    Physical contact is very important.

     

    You never see me do it in stores, and you never see me walk on any busy sidewalks... 

     

    Non Verbal Communication is more than 90% of our total experience.

    I feel true pity for thehelmsman if he doesn't understand the need for it.

    And, I for you if you can't see the humor in it all. If you don't walk on busy sidewalks then maybe you can walk on air. Such a prestigious individual.

     

    I'll bet you carry her purse as well.:sad:

     

     

  8. 1 minute ago, oldhippy said:

    Funny that you first say "both parties", and next "guy wants etc".

     

    You're right and the same goes for the lady, she wants to mark her territory.

     

    1 minute ago, theguyfromanotherforum said:

     


    Exactly.

    This is why I don't like holding hands.... because of the jerks like op.


    Yea I'm insecure, she's not.

     

    ahahahaa, 

  9. On ‎6‎/‎26‎/‎2017 at 6:48 PM, melvinmelvin said:

     

    The following is a report from US Navy Times on what is linked to above.

     

    https://www.navytimes.com/articles/cargo-ships-captain-flashed-warning-lights-at-destroyer-fitzgerald?utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Navy DNR 06-26-17&utm_term=Editorial - Navy - Daily News Roundup

     

    This seems somewhat confusing to me.

     

    My impression is that most investigators agree that the container ship was coming from "behind" the destroyer.

    It also seems to me that several agree that the container ship was the right of way/stand on ship and the destroyer the give way ship.

     

    As far as I understand the scenario this would mean that the container ship approached the destroyer in the rather narrow green sector aft of the destroyer's athwartships axis.

     

    Then comes the box master's statement where he says that the destroyer didn't give way and that the box carrier was sailing with hard starboard rudder for 10 minutes but didn't manage to avoid the crash.

     

    10 minutes is no short time. The container ship is a 40 000 tonner, not a huge ship. 10 minutes with rudder hard over would bring it far away.

     

    Doesn't add up for me. But maybe I have gotten the scenario all wrong.

     

     

    If the Fitzgerald was being overtaken, its the other ships responsibility to stay clear. The ship being overtaken (Fitzgerald) is the stand on vessel and is to maintain course and speed.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...