Stubby

Hi, Folks.
 

I used to know what order to spell out Thai words, but I've forgotten (probably and age thing ????). And I can't seem to find the answer by searching on Google.

I vaguely remember that if a vowel goes in front of a consonant, you spell the consonant first and then back to the vowel before continuing. Am I right?
 

For example, the word for smart is gèng or เก่ง in Thai. In this case, would you spell it Gor Gai (ก), Sara E (เ), Ngo Ngu (ง), and finally the tone mark Mai Ek?

Thank you in advance,
 

Stubby
 

5 hours ago, gearbox said:

The longer a person has already lived, the progressively longer their projected "life expectancy" becomes!

 

Why is this? This is because all those younger ages when they might have died..... get factored out. They've already lived PAST those ages! Therefore, the average gets recalibrated!

True, but as one gets older, a whole new set of age and lifestyle-related health complications come into play that are rare in younger people. The pessimist might say that every minute over 50 is a bonus. And let's not forget, people today do live longer, but they're also sicker for much longer than they ever were. In some cases, they exist rather than live. Sadly, I've known quite a few. 
 

Thus, the burden on younger families to care for aging relatives used to be... on the scope of life... a short-term commitment. But now, it's often a full-time job that drags on and drains carers for decades.
 

Heck, if sick, aging populations of humans were horses, they would have been shot long ago. And the cullers would say, "Well, it's the humane thing to do.

2 hours ago, Bluespunk said:

If people have to rely on god then we should all learn how to paddle...

May the Lord bless you, Bluespunk ????

8 hours ago, bkk6060 said:

The younger people are developing more western thinking.  They don't want to take care of old people.

People aren't as caring as they like to portray themselves. I don't know about Thailand, but most young people crave a family in the UK. But, then, once they become parents, they live for the day their kids grow up and sod off. We really are a strange species. 

And, out of the 8.7 million creatures inhabiting the earth, humans are the only mugs that have to pay to stay alive.

Still, at least we have the good lord above to watch over us, or the elderly would definately be up the proverbial creek without a paddle.

1 minute ago, richard_smith237 said:

Who nailed you? Foreigners or Thai’s ???

 

In Bangkok I find pretty much everyone to be respectful of motorcycle riders if they are not in the ‘main water throwing area’s’.

 

Close to the ‘main water throwing area’s’ the stereotype of the pi$$ed up idiot foreigner usually plays out and there is some western tool trying to ‘hit’ motorcyclists with a wall of water.

There were no foreigners where I was, but I didn't see who did it. Probably teenagers, though. I can remember how stupid things seemed funny when I was a youngster. Dangerous, yes, but still funny if you're a kid... unless something tragic happens. Anyway, I've got enough supplies in now, so I'll stay off the roads for the next few days.

Drunk foreigners along roadside tourist hotspots are a real pain in the ass during normal times. One of these days, they'll pick on the wrong bloke and end up with a bloody good horsewhipping ????

8 hours ago, malibukid said:

they don't give a toss about old people

It's a global phenomenon, or at least in most modern and developing societies. I first experienced ageism at 39. I passed a telephone interview for an IT position with flying colors. I was then I was asked to email my CV (resume). The response was:

"Oh! We're so sorry; we had no idea you were that old. We're ideally looking for younger talent, someone who can bring a fresh perspective with no set ways to our young, dynamic business." 

Aside from parents and grandparents, most younger people don't like or respect their elders anymore. They see them as doddery, inconvenient, and a drain on society. Some youths even think they should be offered a peaceful pill on their 50th birthday. But I'm sure they will have a different opinion when they reach the big five-oh.

So, I doubt many people are bothered about the elderly dying of COVID outside the immediate family circle.

1 hour ago, impulse said:

A lot of them are waiting for the next 10,000 page dump of the Pfizer documents, which seem to be painting a much different picture than the one we've been spoon fed.  For example, that natural immunity is as good or better than the jabs.  Meaning that 80.2 million Americans don't need the jab because they've recovered and have immunity.  They're not right wingers.  They're following the science.  Instead of the narrative.

 

I still don't understand why the Pfizer documents didn't make headline news worldwide. I wouldn't be surprised in over 90% of the global population have no idea they are even public. However, the findings certainly concerned leading UK cardiologist Dr. Aseem Malhotra and other respected medical experts. If I quote him, my response will probably get deleted, so I'll say no more.

But...

WHY DO OPPOSING OPINIONS GET CANCELED?

I've noticed several intelligent posters on this forum, and you know who they are by their articulate, detailed posts. But it seems that most of them decide to believe a certain way and won't be swayed come rain, come shine, come hell or high water. In fact, they're sometimes mildly aggressive if anyone dares to disagree with them. That probably means they're gentlemen of... how can I put it... ok, of a certain age.

I find this fascinating, considering their ability to collect scientific data and deliver it in non-doctor speak. You would think that such people would be open to all sides of a debate if only to prove the opposition wrong and win the counterargument.

Stubby 

5 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

Thailand has reported its first case of Omicron XE, a hybrid of two previous Omicron variants, shortly after the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a warning about the new strain.

Oh my goodness, here we go again! This news will be music to the ears of some on this forum. Seriously, there are folks on here who can't get enough of COVID-19... they absolutely LOVE IT. I would even go as far as to say they're going to need some serious therapy to cope with the withdrawal symptoms when the coronavirus conversation runs its course. 
 

Ee by gum, there's non funnier than folks, that's for sure!
 

My advice? Pop outside for 30 minutes a day and get yourself a free vitamin D top-up, fellas. It'll also give your eyes a healthy rest from this 'ere screen. ????

5 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

Recently in one of these posts, 80 deaths were reported with a side note that not a ONE of the deceased had received a booster.

 

Things that make you go "Hmmmm?"

Does this suggest that all the deceased were double-vaccinated, then? I thought the vast majority of seriously ill and dead folks were unvaccinated. In the name of sanity... I think it's time to stop reading this stuff because trying to fathom the truth is like a bout of explosive diarrhea in the head.

On 1/5/2022 at 8:49 PM, johnno2 said:

It's a plastic monster, I've never seen so many plastic panels. 

Yes, very plasticky, Johnno2, hence this update. 
 

The GPX Razer is an affordable bike, and it looks cheap without a loving hand polish. But the part that makes it look the cheapest is the smooth plastic panel under the tank with the giant Razer decal. It reminds me of an Airfix model. 
 

Anyway, I got a professional to take the old sticker off and replace it with some quality carbon fiber vinyl wrap. The photo here doesn't do it justice, but this minor modification on either side has made a huge difference. I might even get the front mudguard done.
 

Stubby

 

1 hour ago, humbug said:

 you clearly support the guy in some sort of way, good for you, you can't escape the guy, that's the whole point, you have expats on twitter, posting somone elses tweet or post, that is  negative about the guy, and becoming his social media bouncers, and going on a witch hunt, I saw a few do it, one runs a teaching website, the whole thing is just weird, you can't ignore someone, that many retweet, just not possible, that said, he got a few things wrong visa wise, copied the correct info from this site, and never admitted to it, he seems to be more active on facebook, and twitter is my poison,  so good luck to anyone who finds him useful

RB might feel compelled to share his opinions all over social media. But umm... no one who sees his headlines is forced to read what he's written. I'll leave it at that ????

1 hour ago, DefaultName said:

Because they would be (rightly) accused of hiding data.

See my latest post about that, DN.

8 hours ago, Willy Wombat said:

Pfizer  wants you to get a 4th shot.

= $$$$$$$$$$

I hope all Big Pharma isn't as secretive as Pfizer. It's quite worrying that it took a court order to get them to release the possible side effects of their vaccines. I can understand why they might want to keep them from public view… well, sort of. But why hide them from doctors and others in the medical profession? We already know you can't sue these companies for harmful side effects, so they're not hiding from potential lawsuits. 
 

With headlines like the OP here and secret research results from Big Pharma, it's no wonder some people take an anti stance.

The oil industry must be the only business where price-fixing is not a crime. The greedy producers get away with coordinated supply cuts when the cost per barrel gets too low, then increase supply when prices are through the roof. It's a scam, alright, and they've got us little people over a barrel... pun intended. 

17 minutes ago, arithai12 said:

Does 8 hours a day of finger movements on the phone count as exercise?

Of course, it does; it's finger exercise. And many on this forum would qualify for the Olympics if it became a sport. And let's not forget the Barstool Bobs who get plenty of lip exercise as they share their worldly knowledge with anyone who cares to listen. So, any part of your person that moves is getting some form of exercise, but is it enough? Well, the mirror should give the answer to that ????

1 minute ago, robblok said:

If i were to debate cars i would first educate myself before making a fool of myself. 

I came here to ask questions and to be educated. Isn't asking about stuff how one finds answers and builds knowledge? And if I look daft and make a fool of myself in the process, then so be it. But I can say that I know more now than when I started the topic, and that's the point. 

Enjoy the rest of your day.

Stubby

43 minutes ago, robblok said:

No need Stubby you demonstrated that you have no clue of basic math or that your bias. Either makes it hard to debate with you as you will probably not understand it. You do have a talent for muddying the water

You're right, I am a dimwit when it comes to numbers, but that doesn't stop me from trying. I doubt I'm alone, though. Walk onto any busy high street with a clipboard and ask 100 random people if they understand the difference between relative risk and absolute risk. How many do you think will even know what you're talking about? Basic math, my eye.

22 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

More misrepresentation.

 

The fact that there is debate and differing opinions in science is not cause to come to the ridiculous conclusion “there is no such thing as ‘The Science’”.

 

I have no problem at all with anyone questioning data, but if as you yourself admit, you don’t understand the math, (even when it’s been explained to you multiple times), then surely you understand doubts being raised in the conclusions you draw.

 

You started with admitting that misunderstanding by asking for some stats to be explained, I and others have provided you crystal clear explanations.

 

You then came back with a clone of your original misunderstanding (same misunderstanding different drug data) and you wrapped that up in an extended anti-science, ant-expert missive, that indicates your adherence to these mindsets.

 

In that context it is entirely reasonable to question your motives, you have after demonstrably moved past ‘difficulty’ with math into the realms of anti-science, anti-experts.

 

One other issue stands out, while I would accept language ability is not always accompanied by mathematical ability, it does go hand in hand with the ability to understand logical arguments.

 

Your quality of written English is well above the average on this forum, I would say well above the average for native English speakers, which then casts doubt on the humility of your earlier claim: ‘After all, I'm just a poorly educated bloke from a lower working-class background, so what do I know ’

 

Reading your posts, noting your switch from a statistics question to a wordy anti-science,  anti-expert missive I’ve come to the conclusion your posts are disingenuous.

 

On the other hand, giving you the benefit of the doubt, I can absolutely understand that if you do indeed lack skills in math, you might very well  struggle to understand when things simply don’t add up.

 

My apologies if you misread the directness of my challenge as aggression, no aggression is intended.

 

 

 

Fair comments, CH. 
 

The problem with the written word is that it's not always possible to come across how one intends. As a result, many debates on forums are misunderstandings rather than deliberate provocations. The exception to that is the internet troll, of course.
 

Truce.
 

Stubby. 

1 hour ago, Chomper Higgot said:

This last missive of yours demonstrates the problem that arises from 1 and 2 above.

 

It’s nothing more than the anti-science nonsense you’ve scraped up while digging down the rabbit hole you have been lead down. But thanks for your last missive, it’s exposed your agenda.

There's no need to be so rude and presumptuous, CH.
 

I agree that one should be mindful when debating scientific data in open forums, and even more so if the poster is someone of considerable influence. After all, there's always a risk of sewing doubt, mistrust, and confusion. 

But I assume you don't think it's wrong to question less than transparent or confusing data? And because scientists disagree on so many issues, there is no such thing as "The Science."
 

Of course, I'm not anti-science. I doubt any of us would be living the lives we do without it. And I have no agenda. I'm just a random bloke trying to get grips with confusing data, that's all. Why bother? So that I can make better-informed decisions when it comes to matters of personal health.
 

But please try to be a little less aggressive when responding to strangers on stuff you disagree with.
 

Thank you.
 

Stubby