onthemoon

Wouldn't you call the maintenance service first, before you call the police? Why did they need a rescue service if this was inside the hospital? And why did the people need to be medically examined? I think the article does not tell us the full story.

I see. I actually applied in Bangkok, but the MOI interview was in Pathum Thani.

I did it in Lamlukka. I just saw this is in Pathum Thani. You mean they also take interviews in Nonthaburi? I didn't know that, I thought there is only one place in Thailand where the conduct the interviews.

I had my interview 30 August 2024, too. The mic was taped to the desk. I stood up straight for the songs - that's basic politeness when you sing a national anthem or a royal anthem! I had to sing very loud so that the mic could pick it up, so I think maybe that's why you didn't stand up straight. A bit hunched over? Hm. I was not questioned about my attire or asked to wear yellow; I wore a blue suit and tie as I had read here was considered appropriate, and there were no comments about that. I think it must have been the same batch of officers. So, I am surprised about your negative experience. I found them very polite and professional. I talked to the MOI office only recently, and the documents are still in the process. They couldn't say yet when I will be invited for the next step, the oath ceremony, as "many people" still have to sign. I have a vague hope that I'll get to take the oath still within this year.

The current problem is that so many ministries and departments are involved. The police are the coordinators now., but everybody wants to have a say. I would have no problem if the police would take the lead in the future - as long as it can be one department, as suggested. The current system is highly inefficient and therefore costly for the govt.

I for one am surprised, as I thought the gap would mean that he will have to start again from zero years. I myself had a gap (albeit for 3 years) and it was so. Well, that was more than 20 years ago. Things change, and even if the regulations don't change, government officials and their interpretations change.

(Deleted due to duplication)

This is one thing where I agree with Anutin. I had discussions with different govt people about PR and citizenship and the whole inefficiency of the processes, but nobody wants to put energy into changing it as there are many Ministries and Departments involved, and they would have to coordinate and convince. With everything in one department, we would have somebody to talk to.

This is one thing where I agree with Anutin. I had discussions with different govt people about PR and citizenship and the whole inefficiency of the processes, but nobody wants to put energy into changing it as there are many Ministries and Departments involved, and they would have to coordinate and convince. With everything in one department, we would have somebody to talk to.

Thanks for your confirmation. It took me a bit longer (interview after 2 months or so, completion and receipt of PR after 6 years). I was asking @NativeBob why he said the business way doesn't work. I think it is the most-used option to get PR.

I applied successfully under the business category (starting with the 3-year work permit) and don't see why you would say that everybody would fail. To the contrary, this is the most popular way to do it, I'd say, as everybody I personally know who got PR used that option. I didn't have my yet PhD back then, but I believe it gives you a higher score for education. At least it does for citizenship applications. Nothing to do with the "power" of any particular institution, but a very transparent point system. It does not matter where you graduated, as long as it is an accredited university. I bet your "old chap" did not get an endorsement letter, he just presented his degree. If the uni also wrote a letter, they will have ignored it. No, I did not pay "speed-up money". What for? I never saw a reason for it. Lawyers can't do anything anyway, and rumours are that they pocked a big chunk of the money paid without receipt themselves. They cannot make you pass if you don't meet the criteria - for which you don't need a lawyer.

At Suvarnabhumi, you can always use the Thai passport lanes. At Don Mueang, I was also asked to use the foreigners' lane but successfully persuaded the officer to not reject me after I had stood a long time in the Thai and, and the foreigners' lane was much longer (it was the end of a long holiday). So, the good question is: Is it written down somewhere that PR holders can use the Thai lane? Or does immigration at DMK make their own rules?

Let's see what happens when they run out of the red books that they printed in 1927 and are still distrubuting,

I asked at Suvarnabhumi and wanted to register for e-gate, as I did with the previous incarnation of e-gates. They said, I must go to the PR section at CW, only they can register PR holders. When I was at CW to renew my PR (sorry, get an endorsement), I was told they have nothing to do with the e-gates. All is well organised, as we can see.

You need to cool down. If you want to apply for citizenship, it means you want to stay here forever. Once you have your PR, what's the urgency? Before you can apply for PR, you have to be on the same work permit for three years. And once you have the PR, who have to have it for 5 years before you can apply for citizenship. In my case, I am now in year 22 since that initial WP was issued. There is some hope that I will receive citizenship this year.