Bacon1

A powerful winter storm named Byron slammed into the Gaza Strip on Dec. 11, 2025, unleashing torrential rains and flooding across war-torn tent camps, leaving displaced residents cold, soaked and at risk of illness. Floodwaters rose knee-deep in many areas, destroying limited belongings and worsening already dire conditions for families living in makeshift shelters. Emergency services reported thousands of distress calls as the humanitarian situation intensified. Gaza has been struggling with a severe humanitarian crisis after more than two years of conflict and displacement, despite a cease-fire that took effect in October. Vast numbers of Palestinians remain in temporary tents with little protection from weather, poor sanitation and damaged infrastructure. Aid deliveries and proper winter supplies have been insufficient, leaving populations especially vulnerable to extreme weather. Health workers and relief groups warn the flooding has heightened the risk of disease, exposure and hardship, particularly among children and the elderly. In the southern city of Khan Younis, medics reported the death of an eight-month-old baby, Rahaf Abu Jazar, from exposure after water inundated her family’s tent. Civil defense teams, hampered by fuel shortages and destroyed equipment, struggled to respond to more than 2,500 emergency calls across the enclave. Aid organizations and residents say stalled or blocked humanitarian access has left Gaza unprepared for the storm, with urgent needs for water pumps, winter shelters and medical supplies. The limited deliveries promised under the cease-fire — including tents, caravans and winter essentials — have not reached the scale required to protect the displaced population. As heavy rain continues and temperatures drop, conditions are expected to worsen unless relief efforts increase rapidly. Key Takeaways Winter Storm Byron’s heavy rains have flooded Gaza’s displacement camps, worsening the humanitarian crisis. Insufficient aid supplies and stalled deliveries under the cease-fire have left residents exposed and vulnerable. Medics report at least one child’s death from exposure and thousands of emergency distress calls due to flooding. Adapted From https://apnews.com/article/mideast-wars-gaza-storm-12-11-2025-d92be5d741f6fbbf98dd3e360b99b8e4?utm_source=copy&utm_medium=share

U.S. tariffs on imported goods are reshaping the economy and affecting prices paid by businesses and consumers. New tariffs raise import costs for companies, which typically pass those costs to customers, pushing up prices on a wide range of goods. The issue is now central to legal and economic debates in Washington. Tariffs are taxes imposed on goods entering the country, designed to protect certain domestic industries from foreign competition by making imported products more expensive. When a business imports goods, U.S. Customs and Border Protection bills it for the tariff before the merchandise can clear. Over time, firms usually transfer those additional costs to consumers through higher retail prices, especially when tariffs remain in place for extended periods. The current tariff regime stems from broad measures enacted in 2025, which have sparked controversy and drawn scrutiny from economists and legal experts alike. Critics argue that while tariffs aim to bolster domestic production and jobs, they also raise costs for non-protected industries and consumers. Some companies have absorbed portions of the tariff costs temporarily, but many report increased financial strain. The Supreme Court is reviewing the legality of these tariffs, particularly whether the executive branch exceeded its authority in imposing them without clear congressional authorization. If the court rules against the administration, it could lead to tariff rollbacks or refunds to affected businesses. Economists note that tariffs can trigger market inefficiencies by favoring less efficient domestic producers at the expense of competitive imports. They also highlight risks of retaliatory trade actions by other countries, which could further disrupt U.S. exports. Looking ahead, the continuation of tariffs depends on legal outcomes and potential legislative action by Congress. If tariffs remain in place, their economic effects — including on prices, investment decisions and international trade relations — are likely to persist and evolve. Key Takeaways U.S. tariffs increase costs for importers, which are generally passed on to consumers through higher prices. The Supreme Court is considering challenges to the president’s authority to impose sweeping tariffs without explicit congressional approval. Critics warn tariffs risk market inefficiency and retaliation from trade partners, potentially harming broader economic activity. Adapted From https://theconversation.com/tariffs-101-what-they-are-who-pays-them-and-why-they-matter-now-271576

Post removed @IDFHero

This is the third advisory by Moderation. Debate politely. Do not post aggressively.

The NHS in England is preparing for what officials warn could be its worst winter crisis in the next fortnight, driven by a sharp surge in flu cases that has left hospitals, GP surgeries and ambulance services under intense strain. Average daily hospital admissions for flu reached 2,660 last week, up 55% from the previous week, with no peak in sight and cases of other respiratory viruses also rising. NHS leaders said this surge is already pushing services to their limits and could worsen care delays. The current situation follows an unusually early and severe flu season dominated by a highly transmissible H3N2 strain, which has contributed to record hospitalisations for this time of year. In addition to flu, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and COVID-19 are also contributing to hospital pressure. Hospital waiting lists are high, and some trusts have declared critical incidents due to demand exceeding capacity. Public health officials and NHS leaders are urging those eligible to get a flu jab before Christmas, warning that vaccine uptake remains low in some risk groups despite stocks being widely available. Professor Meghana Pandit, NHS national medical director, said the surge and the impending resident doctors’ strike, scheduled from 17–22 December, leave the NHS facing a “worst-case scenario” and staff under enormous pressure. Critics say the strike could deepen the crisis unless an improved offer is accepted, and political leaders have called on medics to reconsider. Experts also recommend simple mitigation measures such as masking and good ventilation to reduce virus spread. Some trusts are adapting how care is delivered to manage the influx of patients. Health officials emphasise that vaccination remains the best protection against severe illness. Looking ahead, NHS bosses forecast challenging weeks ahead with flu cases still rising, the winter peak yet to come and the potential impact of strike action still unresolved. Continued monitoring of hospital admissions and vaccine uptake will shape ongoing guidance and responses. Key Takeaways NHS England reports record flu hospitalisations, up 55% in a week, risking its worst winter crisis yet. Resident doctors are set for a five-day strike from 17–22 December amid rising service pressure. Health leaders urge vaccination and simple protective measures to limit severe illness and hospital strain. Adapted From https://www.theguardian.com/society/2025/dec/11/nhs-bracing-for-worst-ever-winter-crisis-in-next-fortnight-amid-rising-flu-cases

I strongly suggest that everyone calms down, & posts respectfully, or this thread may end up being locked. Thank you

Offensive post removed @IDFHero Reply & Flame removed

Chan Rak Thong Are these the 3 words you learnt from her? 😂😂😜

Unnecessary comment removed @newbee2022

Antagonistic comment removed @IDFHero

A new study confirms that Alternanthera littoralis — commonly known as Joseph’s Coat — has real anti-inflammatory, pain-relieving, and anti-arthritic effects, validating its traditional use. Researchers from Federal University of Grande Dourados (UFGD), State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), and São Paulo State University (UNESP) conducted lab-based studies showing the plant’s extract significantly reduced swelling, improved joint condition, and modulated inflammation-related chemicals in experimental arthritis models. What the Research Did First, scientists performed a chemical analysis of an ethanolic extract made from the aerial parts of A. littoralis, identifying key bioactive compounds. Then, they tested the extract on animal models of arthritis to assess anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects — followed by toxicology tests to check safety. The results were encouraging: treated animals showed notable reductions in joint swelling and inflammatory markers, alongside signs of antioxidant and tissue-protective activity. According to the authors, these findings support the traditional medicinal value of Joseph’s Coat and lay the foundation for future herbal-product development. What’s Next Although initial results suggest a good safety profile at therapeutic doses, the researchers stress that more testing is needed before human use. That includes extended toxicological studies, standardized extraction methods, and clinical trials to confirm safety and effectiveness in people. Key Takeaways The Joseph’s Coat plant (Alternanthera littoralis) shows scientifically validated anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and anti-arthritic effects. Animal tests demonstrated reduced joint swelling, improved joint health, and balanced inflammatory mediators — supporting traditional uses of the plant. Further research — including clinical trials and standardized production — is required before any human-use recommendations. Adapted From https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-12-folk-medicine-anti-inflammatory-arthritic.html Link To Study https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378874125014126?via%3Dihub Plant Image Link https://identify.plantnet.org/k-world-flora/species/Alternanthera littoralis P.Beauv./data

Comment on moderation removed If you have a question for moderation, then contact support or moderation. @swissie

Threatening comment removed @IDFHero 9. You will not post disruptive or inflammatory messages. You will respect other members and post in a civil manner. Personal attacks, insults or hate speech posted on the forum or sent by private message are not allowed.

Read the first bolded paragraph, for a better understanding of the topic, please

In the U.S., transplanting genetically engineered pig organs into humans is gaining ground — yet growing human organs inside pigs remains off-limits. That may seem contradictory, but the reasons are rooted not in science, but in ethics and perception. A recent clinical trial transplanted a gene-edited pig kidney into a living human patient. The pig kidney had been modified to mimic human tissues, offering an alternative to waiting for scarce human donors. Scientists once pursued a different route: disabling the pig embryo’s organ-forming genes and injecting human stem cells so the pig would grow a human organ. In 2015, however, National Institutes of Health (NIH) halted funding — a ban that still stands. The ban wasn’t about the technical difficulty. Instead, it rested on ethical concerns: human cells might migrate into the pig’s brain or other tissues, potentially creating an animal with human-like consciousness. Some argued such “chimera” pigs should be treated like human research subjects. Critics of the ban say this reasoning is inconsistent. After all, regulators currently permit making pigs “a little more human” (through gene edits) — while rejecting the idea of pigs carrying fully human organs. Key Takeaways Pig organ transplants in humans are moving forward — gene-edited pig kidneys already are being tested clinically to address the major shortage of donor organs. Growing human organs in pigs remains banned under an NIH funding pause since 2015, largely due to ethical concerns about human-like cognition in chimeric animals. The ban is rooted in moral assumptions, not science — critics argue the logic treats human-cell chimeric pigs inconsistently compared with genetically edited pigs whose organs are already used in humans. Adapted From https://theconversation.com/putting-pig-organs-in-people-is-ok-in-the-us-but-growing-human-organs-in-pigs-is-not-why-is-that-270562

Europe’s most senior human-rights official has cautioned that Keir Starmer and other leaders risk creating a dangerous “hierarchy of people” by seeking to limit protections under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). In an exclusive interview, Michael O'Flaherty, Commissioner for Human Rights at Council of Europe, slammed what he called a “lazy correlation” between migration and crime — a rationale being used to justify weakening core human rights protections. Recently, 27 Council of Europe nations, including the UK, signed a non-binding statement urging a reinterpretation of key articles in the ECHR. Under the proposed changes, the definition of “inhuman or degrading treatment” (Article 3) could be narrowed, and deportations of foreign criminals — even those citing poor health or prison conditions — would become easier. Critics warn these moves could erode fundamental civil liberties, not just for migrants but anyone at risk of losing legal protection. O’Flaherty warned that once rights begin to be restricted for one group, it sets a precedent for further cutbacks. “For every inch yielded,” he said, “there’s going to be another inch demanded.” Legal experts and human-rights organisations argue that this shift could weaken protections for protestors, detainees, and people with serious health needs — undermining the universal principles at the heart of the post-war human-rights system. Key Takeaways Human-rights alarm raised: Michael O’Flaherty warns curbing ECHR could establish a divisive “hierarchy of people.” Legal changes proposed: 27 European states — including the UK — want to reinterpret Articles 3 and 8 to ease deportation of foreign criminals. Broader impact feared: Rights restrictions aimed at migrants could end up undermining protections for all, including detainees, protestors, or vulnerable individuals. Adapted From https://www.theguardian.com/law/2025/dec/10/keir-starmer-hierarchy-of-people-constraining-human-rights

Empty post removed @save the frogs

Watson's https://www.watsons.co.th/th/blog/health-wellbeing/melatonin-sleep-work

6. She asks for 300k

Baiting post removed @theshu25

Flame removed @FrankieGoesToHolly

Unnecessary comment removed @Celsius Reply removed

Most people picture rural America as shrinking, white, farm-based, healthy, traditionally family-oriented and politically conservative. But a fresh look at the data shows rural America is far more diverse, complicated, and changing than these stereotypes suggest. What’s Really Going On in Rural America While many believe rural regions are rapidly depopulating, recent statistics reveal a more mixed reality. Between 2010 and 2020, about one-third of rural counties actually saw population growth, especially those near cities or with attractive natural amenities. And because places can shift from “rural” to “urban” in official designations, rural America isn’t vanishing — it’s evolving. Farming still exists — but it’s no longer the backbone of rural employment. Only around 6 % of rural jobs are in agriculture. Instead, manufacturing and service-sector jobs (like retail, hospitality, and home care) drive much of the rural economy. Unfortunately, many of these jobs offer low wages, unstable hours, and limited benefits — leaving a large portion of rural families financially vulnerable. Rural America has also become far more racially and ethnically diverse than commonly assumed. Roughly 1 in 4 rural residents are nonwhite, and among children, the share is even higher — about 1 in 3 rural kids are nonwhite. Contrary to the romantic idea of rural living being healthier, rural populations suffer from what researchers call a “rural mortality penalty.” Across nearly all major causes of death — from heart disease to suicide and cancer — rural Americans face higher death rates than urban dwellers, including among working-age adults. Family structures are shifting too. The traditional nuclear family — married parents raising children — is no longer the dominant norm. Rural children are now less likely than urban children to live with married parents and more likely to be raised in cohabiting households or by grandparents/relatives. Economic instability and poverty are more common, and many families rely on social support programs. Politically, rural support for Donald Trump and the Republican Party was not a sudden “rural revolt.” Instead, it reflects a steady shift over decades, driven by social and regional changes in economic class and party alignment. Key Takeaways Rural America is evolving, not disappearing — many rural counties are growing, and boundaries between “rural” and “urban” shift over time. Diverse, modern economies & demography — fewer people work in farming; rural communities are more racially and economically varied than stereotypes suggest. Health, income and family challenges are widespread — rural residents face higher mortality, economic instability, and shifting family structures, undermining the romanticized view of country life. Adapted From https://theconversation.com/6-myths-about-rural-america-how-conventional-wisdom-gets-it-wrong-269037

Hundreds of apartment buildings across the UK have rolled out digital advertising screens that quietly film residents — prompting a wave of concern over privacy. Supplied by 30Seconds Group, the billboards are installed in communal spaces like lift lobbies, where trapped audiences wait. The company markets the screens as a way to gather “occupant engagement” and demographic data for advertisers — essentially tracking how viewers react to adverts. One tenant, Conor Nocher, living in a block managed by Residential Management Group (RMG), says he’s paying monthly service charges for adverts he didn’t ask for. Even though RMG claims the cameras are not active in his building, the visible hardware alone has alarmed many residents. Civil-liberties groups including Big Brother Watch have slammed the screens as “creepy as hell” — a symbol of “surveillance capitalism.” Critics argue people should be free to move around their homes without hidden cameras scanning their reactions to adverts. While some buildings — including a heritage site in Sheffield — have already removed the billboards after tenant protests, the 30Seconds Group still plans to expand installations to up to 2,000 blocks by next year. Key Takeaways Digital billboards with built-in cameras are being installed in residential blocks across the UK — raising serious privacy concerns. Residents in some buildings are footing the bill for screens showing ads they didn’t request, often without prior consultation. Civil-liberties advocates argue this sort of tracking inside shared living spaces — even if cameras are inactive — erodes the boundary between private and public life. Adapted From https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/dec/09/uk-campaigners-condemn-digital-billboards-track-viewers

A sweeping nine-year investigation by Operation Kenova has concluded that Freddie Scappaticci — widely believed to be the notorious IRA double agent code-named Stakeknife — was shielded by British authorities even as he committed torture and murder inside the Provisional IRA. The report paints a disturbing picture: while acting as head of the IRA’s internal “Nutting Squad,” Scappaticci hunted suspected informers — abducting, torturing, and killing them — all while feeding intelligence to MI5. Despite being involved in dozens of killings and abductions, he avoided prosecution, spent his final years living under a false name in comfort, and died in 2023 at the age of 77. The inquiry found that MI5 repeatedly intervened to protect him: on at least two occasions they removed him from Northern Ireland when police attempted to arrest him for murder and false imprisonment. Even after public exposure in 2003, he was quietly relocated to England, settled in a substantial home, and financially supported — yet never brought to justice. The report concludes that thousands of intelligence files and reports linked to Stakeknife’s activities were ignored, costing potentially more lives than those his handlers claimed to have saved. A policy of “neither confirm nor deny” (NCND) means his identity is not officially named in the public record, and his will was sealed until 2095 — another barrier to transparency. Key Takeaways Scappaticci, believed to be the IRA double agent Stakeknife, committed multiple murders and abductions while secretly working for British intelligence. MI5 and other state agencies actively protected him — intervening to prevent arrests, relocating him to England, and providing financial support — allowing him to evade prosecution despite serious crimes. The final Operation Kenova report condemns institutional failure: intelligence was withheld, opportunities to save lives were ignored, and victims’ families remain without justice or full truth. Adapted From https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/dec/09/britains-golden-egg-how-ira-agent-freddie-scappaticci-was-protected-to-the-end