Bacon1

A dramatic rescue unfolded in central Vietnam when a man stranded in a river by deadly flooding was saved by a drone — an unconventional but lifesaving response as floodwaters surged. The incident occurred in Serepok River in Dak Lak Province, where a 49-year-old farm worker became trapped on a sandbar as the floodwaters rose rapidly. With traditional rescue methods too dangerous given the strong currents, local authorities called in a large agricultural drone. Footage of the rescue shows the drone hovering just above the river’s turbulent surface, lowering a buoy attached to straps. The man held on tightly as the drone fought to resist the pull of the rushing water, dipping precariously close to the surface at one point. Despite the violent currents and gusting winds, the pilot managed to lift him above the water and carry him safely across the river — a tense, harrowing operation that ended in success. The drone rescue in Dak Lak was part of a string of similar efforts this week. Another man was plucked from floodwaters after his boat capsized, though tragically his companion remains missing. Meanwhile, central Vietnam has been battered by torrential rain and flooding, leaving over 50,000 homes submerged, cutting power to half a million households and businesses, destroying thousands of hectares of crops, and causing at least 55 deaths. Key Takeaways A farm drone was repurposed in an emergency to rescue a stranded man from the flooded Serepok River — showing how UAVs can be life-saving in extreme flood scenarios. The rescue demonstrates that in rapidly rising floodwaters, drones can offer a safer, quicker alternative to traditional boat or human-based responses. The flooding in central Vietnam has caused widespread devastation — tens of thousands of homes submerged, major power outages, and dozens of confirmed fatalities. Adapted From https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/37409406/drone-saves-man-drowning-river-flooding/

A Brazilian court has ordered former president Jair Bolsonaro to serve time in prison after being convicted on charges tied to his conduct while in office. The ruling marks a turning point: a former leader, once unassailable, now faces the full force of Brazil’s judiciary. The court found that Bolsonaro violated democratic norms and abused his power — a verdict that shook Brazilian politics and reverberated around the globe. Bolsonaro was prosecuted on several counts, including incitement of violence, mismanagement of federal positions, and undermining state institutions. The prosecution argued that during his presidency, Bolsonaro fostered distrust in Brazil’s electoral and democratic systems, and he used his influence to reward loyalists regardless of merit. In its judgment, the court cited detailed evidence of abuse, including attempts to pressure subordinates and interfere with electoral processes. Supporters of Bolsonaro immediately condemned the ruling as political persecution, framing it as a blow to conservative and populist movements across Latin America. Critics lauded the verdict as a milestone: no one, not even a former president, is above the law. Analysts note this could reshape Brazil’s political landscape, discouraging future leaders from undermining democratic institutions. The court’s decision also calls for systemic reforms, particularly stronger checks on executive power and more stringent oversight of government appointments. Brazil’s democracy may now face a moment of reckoning as voters evaluate whether this conviction will strengthen democratic norms or deepen political polarization. Key Takeaways Former president Jair Bolsonaro has been sentenced to prison after being convicted of abusing his power and undermining democratic institutions. The ruling underscores Brazil’s judiciary capacity and signals that even high-ranking officials can be held accountable. Political fallout is already emerging: supporters decry persecution, while critics argue the conviction could reinforce institutional checks. Adapted From https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/nov/25/jair-bolsonaro-brazil-prison

You've been binned? What you done? What you gonna do now then? Perhaps a career in writing short stories? 🤣

Nope, it's a long term trend. "COVID-19 vaccination has decimated the US population by increasing deaths and decreasing births" Nonsense Using the word decimated, yes, it sounds nice and dramatic, doesn't it, to try and prove a point which doesn't hold any water. I mean, I use the word decimated for something that has real statistical significance, not just nudging the national numbers. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db507.htm

A new report from the Independent Monitoring Boards (IMB) has revealed a disturbing pattern of excessive force and arbitrary handcuffing in UK immigration detention centres, raising serious questions about detainee welfare and dignity. Titled By Force of Habit: How the Use of Force in Immigration Detention Has Lost Sight of Necessity and Dignity, the review documents widespread misuse of restraints—particularly during hospital transfers and deportation procedures. In one stark example, a frail 70-year-old was handcuffed despite having no documented risk. Another detainee, under constant suicide watch, was stripped from the waist down, carried naked onto a plane, and subjected to head-pushing by guards—a case described as profoundly degrading. The IMB found that force was often used for convenience rather than necessity. Staff culture was criticized for being callous, exemplified by a scrawled note on a detention-centre whiteboard reading: “Handle stressful situations like a dog. If you can’t eat it or hump it, piss on it or walk away.” Other findings include poor record-keeping of force incidents, inadequate oversight, and a lack of trauma-informed training—despite many detainees having experienced torture, trafficking, or other severe trauma. The report’s national chair, Elisabeth Davies, called on the Home Office to act swiftly, demanding a change in institutional culture, stronger accountability, and a commitment to use force only when strictly necessary. Key Takeaways Widespread use of handcuffs and restraints in immigration centres is routine, even when detainees pose no risk. For some individuals, force has been humiliating and degrading—particularly during hospital transfers or deportation flights. The culture inside centres lacks accountability and dignity; authorities must adopt trauma-aware practices and tighten oversight. Adapted From https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/nov/26/excessive-restraint-in-immigration-detention-centres-deeply-concerning-report-finds

Offensive comments removed @EastBayRay @JonnyF

Racist comment removed @FlorC 15.You may not discriminate, use slurs, or post hostile or abusive comments based on personal characteristics such as race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity, nationality, disability, medical history, marital or family status, gender identity, or sexual orientation. Posts breaching this rule will be removed, and posting suspension or account closure may result.

69 pages of this thread... Is that an omen, perhaps?😁

Don't think it's your...ermm..heart that's pulsating. 555 Good news about tonight though!

Add some lifestyle photos. Hotels, beautiful scenery. Maldives, that's awesome. Say you want to go there.

13 million people From the previous linked study Methods We conducted a population-based cohort study in Norway and Sweden of 13 million persons who turned 12 years or older in 2021 and were residents at start of follow-up on December 27, 2020. Persons were followed until incident diagnosis of myositis, censoring, or end of study (May 21, 2023). We used Poisson regression to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), comparing rates in risk periods (day 0 up to and including day 180 after each dose) with unvaccinated periods. Corrections for potential confounding were made by adjusting for sex, age, occupation (healthcare worker), region, positive covid-19 test, and comorbidities.

Original study https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/advance-article/doi/10.1093/rheumatology/keaf609/8340427?login=false Results & Conclusion.

Are you texting each other every day?

Yes, I think it's important - as Lightyear said, to keep in mind that she didn’t reject you because of who you are. It was simply because someone else came along, or you didn’t show enough prospects — and by that, I mean financial prospects: A customer. I also think that you went on a few dates with her, and she may well have been interested in you because, as you’ve said, you’re good-looking and, on here, widely regarded as the Adonis of Aseannow. 😁 But it's only about money for her. Whatever the reasons, just put it down to experience. And remember, you’re 54, she’s 25, and intellectually you’re miles apart. Anyway, keep looking, and tell us about the Phuket girl or the Filipino 'virgin'.

When's Nuremberg on Netflix? Really excited to watch it!!

You've seen the light... 😁

Was it just 'Anna' or something else?

Is their a saying in Thai language which means ' clutching at straws'? If she was interested, she would have been clearer in her reply.

What proof do you want, exactly?

That's confusing, because she said 'okay' with bka. It's a polite 'no' slang in isaan.

Put a wad of cash on your Insta for her eyes only. See how she responds. Then you can, if you want to.

Do it!! We're waiting......

Ok Cam, get the pipeline flowing again. 63 pages & 15 followers....👍👍👍 Married by page 100..?😁🤣

Yep, I lasted 12 minutes. Shame 😔

I'll have a butchers later..