- Popular Post
-
Posts
3,599 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by steveromagnino
-
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
I agree it may seem to be picking on her, but let's bear in mind that this is a whole lot different than the trumped up DSI set up against Suthep/Abhisit where Tarit et al get off scott free, this is unquestionably corruption, the only issue is who is to blame.
If the charges are trumped up why is Suthep repeatedly failing to appear when asked ? either you accept people are not responsible for others actions or you dont, if you do then whatever actions go on previously by others has absolutely no bearing on the present, by that I mean your reference to lets not forget blah blah is totally irrelevant to the now. Your right there is a total lack of respect for the law .. period. or Suthep would have been arrested on insurrection charges long ago.
The whole system is corrupt and compromised to the core from top down. including the judicial system. Dubai isnt big enough to house all of them that deserve an ousting.
My point is you cannot have Suthep and Abhisit on trial (which I think is necessary BTW because of the deaths) but not the other CRES members as well as army and DSI including Tarit himself - perhaps if you read the entire phrase "let's bear in mind that this is a whole lot different than the trumped up DSI set up against Suthep/Abhisit where Tarit et al get off scott free" it will make more sense to you what I meant/wrote.
Let's bear in mind the thoughts from secretary of Thawil in 2012 (nation 2012)
"He said no CRES member should escape responsibility if action were taken against Suthep. Thawil said DSI chief Tarit Pengdit could not escape responsibility either, because Tarit was also on the CRES panel."
My point on the rice scheme is it costs loads of cash, so the only issue is who is to blame. Personally, I don't think the PM can spell "rice corruption" I am not even sure if she can say those words (she certainly can say "I was elected by a majority" though) - I really doubt she knew what was going on, she was hardly in Thailand long enough to know.
- 3
-
At a minimum, off the top of my head, there are a wide number of measures in which Thailand is failing, and the only way they will be addressed is with reform, whether before or after an election, first there must be agreement that, for instance, reform is needed on the following:If PT win (which of course they will) then they should be the ones running the country, no question. The problem that's happened, the Government abused its position in a huge way. So reforms are needed before an election can come about again.
What exactly are those reforms needed?
Great wish list. Let's add world peace and a cure for cancer whilst we're at it, eh?
hey, he asked for reforms needed, I gave him a 5 minute list.
planning and doing positive things for a country often are a lot harder than just skimming 60% of the government budget and hoping no one will notice. but doesn't mean it isn't worthwhile.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
But but but.... They were elected. But the Dems. But it's politically motivated.
Maybe it's political that these charges were not probed long ago.
It's part of the plan.The Democrats can't win elections so the choice for the old guard is either a military coup or judicial intervention.Suthep is doing the old guard's groundwork so that the country is as chaotic as possible.It's now understood a coup would be counterproductive so the chosen method of trashing an elected government is directed judicial activism.The courts have been packed with partisan yellow judges.
http://www.dw.de/military-undecided-in-thailand-conflict/a-17361237
I generally appreciate your posts Jayboy, but in this case, you do not feel that the likely loss of 400 billion baht ++ and total lack of accountability or failure to heed any of the many warnings and warning signs should just be brushed under the carpet?
I agree it may seem to be picking on her, but let's bear in mind that this is a whole lot different than the trumped up DSI set up against Suthep/Abhisit where Tarit et al get off scott free, this is unquestionably corruption, the only issue is who is to blame.
Let's not forget how Thaksin intimidated the judges in his false asset declaration, or how his wife tried to pay them off with 'donut box gate', or how his wife falsified documents and presented them in court, or how many various politicians have lied about degrees, hidden their relatives for a murder charge, run off overseas to avoid punishment - there is a total lack of respect for the judiciary from some politicians, all I can suggest is if a politician doesn't want to be sued/sent to jail....don't break the law.
- 12
-
I'm an ABAC grad, I would go with Mahidol if I did my degree again, mostly because ABAC IMHO has gone backwards a little.
FYI if you speak (as I assume you do) Chinese, you should not have a problem getting a job at all.
We hired a Chinese guy out of ABAC, he struggled the first year, was good the 2nd year and now is frigging AWESOME at his job (since promoted) and he has leveraged that he speaks Thai, Chinese, English very well - you could be the same.
Feel free to PM me if you want to talk further.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
If PT win (which of course they will) then they should be the ones running the country, no question. The problem that's happened, the Government abused its position in a huge way. So reforms are needed before an election can come about again.
What exactly are those reforms needed?
At a minimum, off the top of my head, there are a wide number of measures in which Thailand is failing, and the only way they will be addressed is with reform, whether before or after an election, first there must be agreement that, for instance, reform is needed on the following:
- freedom of the press and freedom to communicate ideas without political interference (impossible currently and really difficult since 2007)
- proper oversight of budget and spending - it is Thai people who pay the costs of the government budget, it is not politicians' money to spend as they wish without oversight as is being proposed and has occurred with multiple examples (flood management, rail system, rice scheme)
- separation and respect for separation of powers especially judiciary and legislative branches
- ability of candidates to canvas for support or present their ideas in a fair and neutral environment (impossible with red shirt villages for instance) during an election (note some candidates were not even able to register, and different parties were treated differently)
- severe and genuine punishment for lies and misrepresentation by parties or individuals with no exceptions
- severe punishment for vote buying or electoral fraud
- respect for the constitution - it is INSANITY to allow a convicted fugitive who refuses to return to Thailand to be allowed by the foreign minister to wander around the world freely while the government campaigns foreign governments for him to be able to do so, when the letter of the law states their job is return him to face justice. It is INSANITY to allow said individual to be allowed to effectively run the government - I don't care if you were elected, that's not a blank cheque to do what you want
- reduction in corruption with increase in oversight by the public and watch dogs
- increase in penalties for corruption and inciting unrest outside of what is allowed in the constitution, with genuine attempts to punish leaders who encourage others to break the law (this is one reason why the entire amnesty idea was frigging dumb from the beginning)
- a more evolved political system which reduces the power of the regional godfathers who control the rural vote for the most part (admittedly slowly decreasing) and are in turn controlled by the fugitive from Dubai on one side of the house, and by some very unsavoury individuals in the opposition on the other - this one is very tough but vital to handling some of the corruption related issues - some of the items above are required to ensure that the political system evolves
- a meritocracy in the civil service with major rewards to stamp out corruption and major punishments for condoning it - the fear of the fugitive in Dubai and his methods is why so many civil servants will not admit publically to the corruption they will privately tell some very shocking stories about that we all know (we can read Thaksin former ally turned enemy turned ally Sanoh for a typical example)
- a bigger picture issue: equality. It is indeed true that rich people are treated differently than poor in Thailand, especially people of influence. That the Deputy PM's son could get away with murder, or a rich kid can drive into a cop, or a bunch of rich politicians can defraud the country of billions...and yet a poor person can go to jail on trumped up charges. Or that certain rich people get the government to work for them to lie, create FTAs or policy to tilt the playing field in their favour - this is a longterm issue that can only be resolved with respect for the law starting from the top and working down - do we see politicians respecting the law? that's as funny as anything Steve Colbert can come out with.
Now one might say......none of the above matter. Some would say if I am PM, if I have a majority in parliament then I can do what I want, and if I want to in fact tilt the business environment, reward my supporters however undeserved, reduce media freedom and increased control, increase corruption that enriches me, interfere with every other branch of power, reduce any oversight, ignore the constitution, eliminate any vestige of meritocracy and only reward my allies.....I can BECAUSE I WON THE ELECTION outright. So people chose me to do what I said I would, and therefore the law doesn't apply.
Ok, let's push it further. We've seen laws made for personal profit by Thaksin, 'because he was elected he could do it'. We've seen both sides select and remove people for political, not country benefit. We've seen ongoing attempts especially by TRT/PPP/PT to remove oversight even when it was set out in the consitution. We see vast amounts of government budget used for pork, personal advertising, personal travel, popularist schemes that will make the country broke....justified "because I won the election".
We've gone through this exact scenario in 2005/6. It does not end well. For anyone.
The purpose of a functioning democracy is not a popularity contest where the majority elect their party to look after their interests (or to do whatever they want). Rather it is to select the best possible people, chosen by their peers, to look after EVERYONE'S interests including the minorities who cannot vote, or cannot secure election wins.
The answer is pretty simple. There must be genuine compromise on both sides. Both sides agree on reform, a neutral viewpoint is currently a successful next election is an impossibility, it is a pointless waste of our cash with an almost guaranteed null outcome. To say that it cannot be moved is simply not true, and for Yingluck to blindly keep repeating her right as she was elected with a majority is not a compromise.
We know PT are buying up smaller parties to make up the shortfall of voter losses they think they are going to see. This buying up of factions is something that overseas media simply do not understand, and their inability to understand it is why they do not see the issues facing Thailand are not quite the same as some other countries.
The protesters rejecting every offer, however opportunistic and insincere many have been, is also not a compromise.
The real compromise starts with genuine talks, similar to what we saw with the red shirts with the PM, except of course the red shirt leader who should be on trial for treason, was not in the room and was supposedly sending SMSs to cease talks since amnesty was not on the cards.
The problem must be resolved between the leaders to create a path that all agree on, then the election becomes less important, less of a hot potato. Both sides claim a commitment to reform. Maybe both sides are insincere. But let us all hear what those reforms should be, because the current scenario similar to 2006 is not going to end well for any of us.
Reform IMHO means there must be acceptance of consequences, with action comes consequence, and the start is chronological, each and every corruption/civil unrest case should be reviewed and completed even if the defendant refuses to attend. No amnesty, no people let off the hook, no <deleted> about 'I was elected so I don't have to participate' and certainly no more rubbish about personal wars against 1 family; let them have their day in court, we all know Yingluck has little to do with government policy anyhow, she should be considered merely a secretary, not a PM. After all, that is her work history with AIS/SC Asset anyhow.
- 6
-
short vowel - when the first syllable is a short vowel then the rising tone transfers to the next syllable.
ขนม same principle.
-
- Popular Post
Well done, YS, for not giving in to the mob.
Like most senior Civil Servants in Thailand, the EC has shown itself to be utterly useless at doing its job, which is to organise and run the election. It is the perogative of the PM to decide on the date of that election within the parameters set down by the Constitution. It is not for the EC to decide when or if an election should or should not be held.
The Constitution does not have a clear explanation for the exact nature of the current situation and so it seems highly likely we will have a pointless election with no result.
It is however worth noting Constitution clause Section 236 states
The Election Commission shall have the following power and duties.....
(6) to order a new election or new voting at a referendum to be held in any or all polling stations when there occurs evidence that the election or the voting at those referendum stations has not proceeded in an honest or fair manner
If for example I cannot register my candidates for my southerner party which was aiming to win 20 seats in those southern provinces, then surely this is not fair - likewise the inability of candidates to campaign in the northeast or north arguably is not fair - these would seemingly provide the ability of the commission to order a new election, the only question being whether one has to be conducted which is clearly unfair, to then rule that a new election is required, or whether you can preemptively rule to the unfairness, the four corners principle of reading would suggest you have to hold the election, pointless though it will be.
Section 239
In the case where the Election Commission passes a decision requiring a new election or revoking the right to vote prior to the announcement of an election of member of the house of representatives....their decision shall be deemed final
So the EC has the right to pass the decision. This is an obvious check and balance to prevent fraud by a ruling party if the election is full of fraud as occurred for instance in 2006.
We can also refer to the Organic Act for the Election of the House of Representatives for further evidence of their right (the EC)
Section 109
When the counting of votes is completed....if there appears to be convincing evidence that an election...was not held in an honest and fair way....the Election Commission may... arrange a new election
Section 93 deals with the issue of when a house of representatives can be formed
In the case of a general election, there occurs a result of [less than 480 members but not less than 95% of 480] it shall be deemed the members shall form a house of representatives [within 180 days] and shall hold term for the remaining term as the house of representatives
As there are 22 constituencies with zero candidates, and possibly more that will return a null result, it seems impossible that we can have a fair manner election, albeit for reasons outside the conditions of corruption by the ruling party. Echoes of 2006.
I do find it ironic that given the way Thaksin ignored the Constitution when it suited him (starting from lying about his asset declaration and including running through almost every watchdog and provision for separation of powers), that now of all things, his party are claiming that the 'constitution won't allow them to change the date.'
The lipservice to reform is pointless with meetings similar to the flood management scheme (stacked with their own spineless yes-men), but the obstinance of the protesters to refuse any compromise is equally frustrating to watch. Anyhow, I am confident that if we just let Yingluck back into power, the entire country would be broke and ruined in the next 18 months and then finally, the Shinawatra power will be at an end anyhow. Let's remember the economy started tanking in August 2013, despite the tax decreases and an almost perfect year - as Newcastle fans once sang' you don't know what you are doing' and that certainly rings true with all the idiotic missteps of the last 6 months from rice to flood management to the rail scheme to the amnesty attempt to the decision to try to fight with the courts.
- 4
-
Get him into the following (a list of ideas)
- triathalons (trinerds and various other triathalon groups online all train every week)
- sailing (sailing club at Rama 9 park off Srinakarin or go the whole hog join Varuna Yacht Club and hang out with loads of other expat kids of similar age)
- windsurfing/kite boarding (Pattaya or Hua Hin loads of clubs)
- wake boarding (Taco Lake in Bang Na, loads of kids there too)
- Muay Thai or boxing (sport of kings here and really good for self confidence - if you are in Din Daeng Jitti Gym in Rachada would be close)
- running - regularly go to sports club or parks to run
- volunteer in some activity to help others e.g. English at a local school, start tutoring
- basketball at Thai-Japan
- join one of the billion online facebook community clubs for expats - mostly a little older but still useful e.g. science, movies, etc
- cooking classes
- if he's reasonably decent looking - modelling/acting even extra work
- Learn Thai (meet other students, AUA or similar)
Loads and loads of things to do here beyond walking around shopping centres. Learning Thai I personally think is one of the easiest and most important things that is easy to learn here and very hard to learn somewhere else.
-
On soi Tepprasit there are a few places, other option would be going to one of the boat builders almost all of whom have circular saws and workmen, and give them some cash to do for you. The places in Soi Tepprasit would probably want you to buy the wood from them.
I know that Andaman Boatyard for instance in Na Jomtien has the equipment for instance, as would serenity but whether they would do it or not depends on the owner I guess.
-
This is an industry (construction) I have some knowledge of, and I can say there are plenty of foreigners working in the sector in management/project management roles. Thailand is a stepping stone and a hub for some of the firms for the work they also do in Cambodia, Burma, Laos etc also, plus Thailand is in the middle (well it was until the last month) of a building boom, and with more to come if this current government continue to build white elephants left and right.
With loads of jobs available, in all honesty, the real way to get in is to start with any firm, doesn't matter which and what salary, and immediately start 'pressing the flesh' (in the non prostitute connotation of the word) by networking. If you are good, once you are networking, you will have more job offers than you can handle. The proviso is you need to be competent, capable of communicating and working in a Thai environment, and your results will be what matter - note that I don't necessarily say you need to speak Thai, rather you need to be an effective communicator with the people around you. Thai helps, but English - proper decent English - is vital in engineering. As is knowing what you are doing.
Certain firms are French and prefer to hire French etc, but on the whole, international standard project management firms and design consultancies and engineering firms are ALWAYS looking for competent people, and yes, Thai Engineers can do it, but there is a huge amount of construction going on here, so there are jobs around. However, you will not be able to get into this group if you are not here, not working and not spending the effort to get to know the people around you. And you must be decent at what you do.
The idea that occupations are 'restricted' may be true on paper, but in reality there are Expat doctors, lawyers, architects, etc throughout Thailand, there is a legal work around and so it's just the job title that might be a bit different (e.g. legal consultant rather than Lawyer).
Construction at the moment is a better industry perhaps that O & G for foreigners, in fact most construction sites now have a substantial proportion of non Thai workers/labourers simply because the sector cannot get close to enough people - at an upper level the same issue is occurring with some firms (only a few, but enough nevertheless) wanting to achieve an international standard....and to get there they are using international standard firms/consultants; I truly believe that there is not an issue finding great Thais to do the jobs, but there are simply not enough great Thais, there are plenty of inexperienced ones, but the good ones get snapped up all the time.
I would almost go through the list of firms you are applying for, remove all the big Thai developers/firms unless you have specific experience in an area (e.g. marina construction), and focus on international level consultancies for project management and specific aspects of construction; and apply for those ones. In my experience the world over, really craft and focus on creating a great CV, and be aware that the hit rate is going to be low; your aim is to get a job that gets your foot in the door, and from there, you will leverage that first year into a decent job - assuming you are decent etc etc.
I'm not a huge fan of jobsdb which is mostly for middle/lower Thai office worker recruitment; check out Bangkok Post and also identify the 50 firms you could work for and take a good look through their websites for what jobs are going. A huge number of jobs are not advertised, as is the case in other parts of the world also.
BTW and take this in the spirit it is meant, if you plan to come here to hang out at Soi Cowboy every night or show up at work with an Isaan 'maid' turned wife, etc then you are likely not really going to go anywhere in Thailand; we party hard, and we enjoy our work, but the label of 'farang kee nok' or 'farang tuan' will not wear off if you act like a knob as many farangs tend to do here.
-
Actually, there are a number of Israeli firms and consultants doing business in Thailand, and having a network of people to deal with for translation may be a good business for you.
There are also a lot of Thais going to work in Israel, again having translation 'on demand' is something useful.
I would strongly recommend you make contact with your Ambassador and Embassy, as the Israeli/Jewish community is quite big here for business, there are a number of jewelers, lawyers, consultants, construction/property, fashion firms - now some of these won't need translation being that so many Israelis speak good English, but for legal documents etc proper translation might be useful.
- 1
-
Thai is a single syllable language (for the most part). So it is a lot harder to contextually fill in the gaps, plus unlike English Thais have (except in Bangkok where there are quite a lot of thai speakers) yet to hear a lot of Thai that is outside the regional accents....resulting in a bit of an expectation that the word is said correctly because there are so few syllables to join together.
Honestly, if I heard you mispronounce it, I could make the mental leap to get to what you wanted by the context (hardware store, so you are not wanting crab eyes for instance) but given the way I have hear so many farang speak to Thai shop assistants (rattling off a list of things in English often using brand names, then getting frustrated and losing their temper when their list is unable to be understood).
For what it is worth, I had to repeat almost every single thing I wanted to say in USA when I lived there, because of my accent, so I am not sure it's so different.
Which is why, even if you have given up, perhaps a small way to reduce your frustration is get a handheld eng-Thai dictionary, and carry it with you in the car; when you need to buy something you can use that to do a translation on the spot or point and show - it makes doing certain things a lot less frustrating.
-
the problem with this measure is obviously things are very different now compared to say the mid 90s - for instance a number of state owned enterprises are now publically listed (at least in part); there are new entrants to the stock market from the previous family business; there are new businesses.
For USA, this is less of an issue, because the market fundamentals of who is listed and who isn't doesn't change as much - whereas Thailand look at the biggest firms the two largest by market cap were (for the most part ignoring the roll up of various smaller entities) IPOed in about 2003/4. Banks, telcos and energy make up a large proportion of the market cap, and these are all industries undergoing deregulation and substantial change.
I really cannot see the relationship, other than that in good times, firms are more likely to enter the stock market and affect the market cap of the stock market in that country. So it's one of those correlation is not causation type cases.
- 1
-
I believe it happened like this.
Ban - Hello PM
PM - Hello Mr Ban
Ban - I am calling to ask each party in Thailand what they want me to give them for new year.
PM - sorry, I think it's not appropriate for you to give me a gift, it could be considered corruption
Ban - no no, this is hypothetical, I mean, if you could have anything what would it be?
PM - well, I suppose a small box of crystallised fruit would be acceptable
Ban - (confused) are you sure?
PM - yes, that's what I would like.
Ban - After discussing with all parties in Thailand, I have reached a list of demands for each party, based on this time in the new year where each party should be willing to reach a compromise, and show their love for their fellow Thais.
Chalerm would like to see all members of the public stop breaking the law, and then discussion can begin.
Aphisit would like to see a non partisan reform committee to adjust the constitution before election.
and the Prime Minister would like a small box of crystallised fruit.
-
While they are round at Chalerms they might want to look for "that" gun. The one that killed the sgnt at club 21 and was searched for repeatedly at chez Chalerm without success. Any long termers will remember that outrageous case of injustice surrounding the murder and coverup perpetrated by the PTP heroic strongman.
Actually, I feel obligated to correct you.
It was Club 20, not Club 21.
And the son apparently only needed a year while Chalerm aided and abetted his fugitive son to somehow find a way that all the witnesses either suddenly hadn't seen anything or blamed "Ai-Peud" who apparently was the shooter. He was a proud MP at the time helping his fugitive son, so in this respect it's not so different now.
-
I clearly state that "on average Thais make 1/10 the wage of their American counterpart" in some cases it might be 1/8 in other cases it might be 1/15th, and this is true for those making minimum wage right up to those with advanced degrees Is it possible that you have been over in Thailand for so long that English is your second language now? In any event I come back to my premise in answering what the OP was asking, and that is why would anyone come to Thailand to seek employment at 1/10th the wage they could make back home when the living costs on average are on only about 1/2 of what they are back home
While it may be true on average to consider 1/10th, I would say that Bangkok management wages vs. USA senior management are closer to perhaps 1/4 - 1/2 depending on the role. Speaking from personal experience (as I have always earned a totally Thai salary rather than an expat package) I know that every senior exec in my company now (and companies I worked for in the past) is earning within the ballpark of what they would earn in a similarly sized mid level company in a 2nd tier city in USA other than arguably the CEO (exec management around $100 - $200k USD per year; senior management around $60k - $90k USD per year; junior management $15k - $75k per year etc etc). This is quite on par with jobs outside my company, and in fact when I am approached to change jobs or in discussions recruiting new staff, I am fairly sure these numbers are quite typical for a "decent standard" Thai company (i.e. subsidiary of an MNC, Thai listed company, decent size Thai company). No doubt wages are less if you are working outside the CBD in some tinpot little organization in Nakhon Nowhere. There is definitely a difficulty in pulling really decent New York/LA/SF level salaries however, hence why I'd say it's 1/4 - 1/2 maybe on average for the type of job a foreigner could do.
So for someone like the OP looking to move to work here, there are decent paying jobs out there, loads of them in some industries (PR, advertising, finance, property, construction, etc), but they tend to require or look at a decent work record; a decent academic record....and you need the connections to land a job or find out about a job here - made a whole lot easier if you are here already.
The best jobs are not going to be advertised, so you need links with recruitment agencies, and to closely follow the firms you want to work for. The fact you are not a Thai (and resulting need to do work permit etc) are not a deal breaker, however proving your worth here is more difficult. It's well known that Thailand is a major 'loser magnet' economy - there are some real dregs out there working here for a pittance simply to hang out at Nana Plaza. You can forget that whole aspect of life here if you are serious about working here. There are also some very very smart people here too from around the world (plenty from Japan, Singapore, HK, Australia, etc) so you need to be hanging around the right people to some degree - here it's know who, not know how that matters most, at least to get in the door.
Although I have only lived some of my life in USA, I am unsure that I would be financially better over in USA compared to here, I doubt it simply as I am a person of simple tastes; if you want to live like an American(eating steak daily, driving a BMW 5 series etc etc) in Thailand, then the equation won't work at all because it will cost you more to live here, and you'll earn less, on that I agree.
I am not entirely sure nor do I agree that Thai bosses are tyrants any more than any other nationality, at least not in an 'international standard' company - certainly the ownership can result in more owner interference and less oversight than a US firm - but there are ways to work around almost every aspect of the workplace. In general, I can say I find the work environment to be pretty relaxed and enjoyable; my staff are willing to work far harder than their American counterparts, but certain aspects of managing them is required to ensure they are kept happy, for want of a better word.
- 1
-
I think your Aunt had some good advice. She probably understood more about cognition than she realized. I know I speak too quickly; perhaps in an attempt to sound more fluent.
When I repeat I usually try to say it in a different way. Maybe it is better to say the exact same thing, slowly and clearly.
(Reminds me of a visit to the hardware store. I asked for ตาปู, but they didn't understand. I tried miming the action of a carpenter pounding a nail with a hammer. Still no luck. I found the nails on my own.)
Yes, my auntie speaks Thai, but not so much English, so it was good when I first moved back as I had to speak almost all Thai. Sadly she didn't correct many of my mistakes, but most of them, so I guess I did ok.
ตาปู is actually ตะปู (so that's the really short vowel sound for the ตะ and then long for the ปู; when you see the ะ it's the aim to cut the vowel sound as short as possible, a short break between the syllables, then the ปู is long vowel sound. ตะ is not an easy sound for a westerner to say, I swear I cannot hear the difference between ต and ด even though I know exactly how to say each. ด is like a D in the word door, dawn, dog. ต you move your tongue from the middle of the roof of your mouth when you say d to instead press your tongue fairly hard against the back of your front upper teeth and you push the middle of your tongue to the roof of your mouth, sealing the airfloor, then push slightly more air through your mouth when you release your tongue from against your teeth and say the ต meaning it comes out as a harder sound halfway between a D and a T (which doesn't exist in English).
It's the same for บ and ป, not easy for an English speaker to say correctly, again (my aunt) taught me the physics so the sound comes out correctly, so even though I cannot hear the difference always between the 2, I get the sound right. บ is easy like bike boy band, you push your lips together gently and gently exhale and the sound comes out. ป is more complex halfway between a P and a B, and the way to say it is to force your lips together so they are rolled onto eachother (rather than just touching) they are holding ALL the air from coming out of your mouth, push about twice as much air through and then release your lips almost like a P sound and s you say ป
I did find that exaggerating the way to say each at first was a little comical but ended up in getting the sound actually correct.
So the word ตะปู is one of the hardest for a western speaker to get right; it is very rare I meet a western Thai speaker who seems to nail a word like this
- the vowel lengths (in English tend to all be medium length, this word needs short vowel then long vowel)
- the ต sound correct (normally comes out as English D which is sounds same to us, but is a multitude different for a Thai listener)
- the ป sound correct (normally comes out as English B which sounds same to us, but again is very different for a Thai listener)
If you know the word hammer ค้อน (long vowel high tone) then the context would be easier, but for sure this is the type of word I would also stumble on sometimes to get myself understood.
And just to put in context, I use Thai all the time in the workplace and am (sometimes) confused for a native Thai speaker (not for long though)...but there are certain words like ตะปู that give me away.
- 2
-
Here it is.Oh man i would really really like for you to record saying หมูทอดกระเทียม". (or something other)
http://vocaroo.com/i/s1O79FAt2iVZ
BTW, what kind of media files can be uploaded? I tried m4a, m4v and mp4, but all were rejected.
I have zero problem understanding what you are saying.
It is easily clearer than 95% of the farang I have heard speak Thai; you seem to have a pretty reasonable understanding of the tones, Moo is actually a rising tone (you are using a high tone because you have cut the sound so short, it should be more like moooooooooo (rising) toooooord (falling) you are cutting it a bit short, G (gratium) not K (kratium, yes it is written kratium but said with a G) but that is still easy enough to understand.
The only thing I can guess is you don't have the context, I would not walk into a Thai restaurant and just say this. It would be like walking into McDonalds and blurting out "cock". With a little context, it would be quite understandable (despite my mispronounciation)
(wait for server)
hello can I take your order?
Hi, can I get a big cock?
you mean a coke large size?
yes
would you like fries with that?
no, just the coke.
etc etc
I can think of countless farang I work with who speak Thai far, far worse than this and they get understood, I can only guess it is perhaps who you are speaking to, and perhaps not wrapping enough context into the conversation, or it is some sort of alignment of the moons. Honestly, I have zero problem understanding you.
I know you have sort of given up, but at least when I first moved back here (I could speak a little Thai as a kid) I had an aunt who said the following things:
- speak slowly, it will help the person speaking to you to speak slowly
- if they don't understand, carefully say the same thing again, exactly the same
- there are many reasons why someone won't understand you, it doesn't mean you are saying it wrong, it may be they are partly deaf; they may be preoccupied with something else; they may just be a moron - don't assume it's because you are speaking gibberish
Anyhow, I really do think you are very very close, easily good enough, are you in Bangkok? Upcountry sure, people cannot even always understand a city accent, in Bangkok people should be understanding you with this level of pronounciation.
- 2
-
Comparing to SIA, isn't it that Nok Air is the low cost carrier (equivalent of SCOOT, Tiger), and Thai Smile is the regional secondary cities carrier (equivalent of Silk Air)? Like a bridge between LLC and a normal airline?
LLC usually means:
- paying for food onboard
- reduced luggage and no frequent flyer benefits
- possibly no assigned seating/preferred seating premium
- reduced seat size/recline
- using secondary airports
- point to point
Much as I love Tony Fernandez, I never fly Airasia and other LLC, the tiny non reclining seats, hygiene, bus like atmosphere and general way the whole experience works just means I either go with a 'proper airline', or I drive.
BTW I was actually at the conference when K Tossapon actually stated (way back when Suvarnabhumi first opened and they were running to there) that they didn't care about the plan of a low cost terminal at Suvarnabhumi, they were quite happy to move over to Don Muang to save their customers money. As it is point to point, the idea of linking flights matters less I think to their customer base (who don't mind paying 400b to go from one terminal to the other I guess, and that's not money Airasia sees anyhow).
So it's not a conspiracy from Thai to keep them out of Suvarnabhumi, rather mutual agreement to head over to Don Muang as a result of the airport being not really being able to handle the traffic.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
Justice seems always perennially tipped in favour of whomever is in power.
"Justice seems always perennially tipped in favour of whomever is in power"
Er........do you know something we don't. You seriously suggesting that a judicial system that has banned two Thaksin associated political parties and is currently doing it's best to dissolve the existing caretaker government, continually finding the democratic party free of any taint whatsoever is perennially tipped in favour of whomever is in power?
Are you having a laugh?
There were ample grounds to ban TRT 2 on the grounds of the ludicrously rigged election they ran in 2006 funding their own competitors to try to give a pretense of a fair election.
Then in 2007 PPP bought votes and were caught; perhaps you think this is acceptable, others don't. They knew the consequences and they did it anyhow.
And now we have DSI's Tarit, the guy who was part of CRES running operations against the protesters in 2010; he apparently can escape ALL consequences, while Abhisit and Suthep face full consequences. We have the guy who organised the coup against Thaksin happily being part of the government.
Justice seems not to be blind, on that I agree...but to suggest that the Thaksin associated parties aren't completely guilty is just crazy.
At least Suthep and Abhisit have not run overseas like the cowards before them (Thaksin, Asavahame, et al) while they try to align the stars to get themselves amnesty.
- 7
-
- Popular Post
Right, this and former governments has no ethics to society , and will never have, as it is in the Thai culture....
But the only government that really invested in huge infrastructure in Thailand was and is the Taksin governments, airport(s), highway, airport link, sky trains, all what we see and use of high end infrastructure, so hopeful also high speed rail system.
During the years of undemocratic government with Abhisit as PM, nothing was build up, only debts.
Let's wait to what the court comes up with, maybe there is a good financial plan and the payback of the loan could be done by income from the investments, so not to quickly with calculating for tax payers in generations.
The reason for investment in infrastructure is basically because that's the best time to skim, plus it would be a good way to disguise lack of economic growth.
- airport indeed was a Thaksin white elephant, for which we overpaid about 2X what it was worth, probably more, and it is questionable whether it is fit for purpose (since it has already reached full capacity and lacks things like bathrooms etc as a result of all the corner cutting TRT did to increase their skim) - the claims that there was not much out of order is mostly because many of the civil service involved are terrified/part of the problem
- highways were mostly built prior to TRT, they did add a few in the areas they have lots of votes for I guess
- airport link is a financial disaster and huge failure - indeed this was created by TRT and passes and stops right past the former PM's wife's SC Asset development for no logical reason, part of a censure against TRT in 2004 from memory
- sky trains were built pre and post TRT, TRT only really got involved with trying to buy it so they could skim the cash out of it
- you didn't mention it, but underground MRT was built mostly pre TRT and all underway pre TRT, TRT only really got involved with first changing the specs (for skim mostly, resulting in some of the teething problems early on)and gifting the in station media contract which was already signed with TRIADS to How Come Entertainment, which coincidentally belongs to Panthongtae, the son of Thaksin
- the over the river BTS past Saphan Thaksin and other extensions indeed took far longer than it should have as a result of TRT, who blocked the extension for as long as they could as they fought to try to take control of it from the Democrat controlled BMA, the ongoing new routes and the new carriages via the BMA were all put together and while it is true PT were the government when it opened in late 2011, they had little to do with getting it all going
It's highly questionable that 'delivery of fresh fruit to Hua Hin' which was the first attempt of PT to justify the high speed rail is going to ensure that the system stacks up at all, if it is anything like SRT then for sure, it is going to be a total waste of time, and burden us with enormous costs for our lifetimes.
If it makes sense, let the private sector build it. If you want us (the taxpayers) to pay for it, then any government must show us why it makes sense to us, not just to the rich politicians going developments in Hua Hin, for example who are using our money to make their own developments more successful. Why we should pay for it without being even shown the cost/benefit analysis or what it will actually cost by writing a blank cheque, I don't know.
Many tax payers would rather have minimal infrastructure investment, than haphazard stupid investment which costs so much. Especially since the government gave all their own business a reduction in corporate tax rate, it really is only the salary people that are stuck paying high taxes.
- 8
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
The trip I took to Hong Kong right after the 2011 election, everyone around us was on free tickets, they were all the upcountry 'or bor dtor' and kamnans who had delivered the votes asked. Some had not travelled abroad before and seemed extremely excited, I guess I would be too. It looked like we were boarding a bus going to Nakhon Nowhere. Never seen the booze cabinet cleaned out so quickly.....at about 8am in the morning.
I know when the flights were going direct to USA, it was almost expected that the entire business and first class sections were filled with government and civil servants, none of whom were paying for the tickets.
With such rampant government interference its not surprising that not only does it drive the Thai Airways workers crazy, but also has a massive effect on the profits. Naturally, the CEO and the board need to be compliant and complicit, otherwise the scheme doesn't work.....also massive skim in the purchase of the plans as well allegedly.
All adds up to a (IMHO) great airline with massive potential, absolutely hamstrung by its owners who cannot keep their hands out of the till.
And when you hear rumours of the low cost airlines not having to provide any real benefits to the civil service/government officials....and their ownership...and their access to the airports....then it really makes you realise the blatant greed of some of the oligarchs of Thailand (even those living abroad).
- 5
-
For what it is worth, I think for a CX5 few would look at it, since it is a new model, and the dates are almost the same.
However, many people (myself included) look at the manufactured date when buying 2nd hand cars. In your case doesn't matter much, but there are cars made in 2010 and first registered 2 or 3 years later (a lot of demonstrators for Euro cars are like this). Also a lot of import cars are 'claimed' say 2012, but are actually far older (e.g. 2004) because the date of the white plates is what is claimed in the ad.
However, that then would rely on someone being able to check the manufacture date, for BMW, VW etc you can use the VIN to check when it was made.
I know what the car looks like, but have no greater understanding than that, for any new model car what you might want to check is if there are any minor changes between the first cars off the production line and subsequent cars e.g. changes in firmware or settings, fixes for annoying things - e.g. Ford seems to have quite a few things when they released their new models relating to the dual clutch; won't make much difference to resale but would be worth checking to see if there is anything that you should check should be done prior to driving off (or making sure it is done at the first check up) just to get the best possible driving experience.
BTW it's a really really nice looking SUV. Great size, congrats!
- 1
-
I cannot believe that any Farang from a democratic western nation would support the fascist protesters.
The Government has been democratically elected.... Let them govern.
Can you imagine all the wealthy people in the USA or UK rioting in the streets, shooting policemen and savagely assaulting taxi drivers because they dont like who the majority of the country had voted into power.
the attack was shameful, and very disappointing to see.
If anyone has details of where this taxi driver is, I would welcome a PM, as I would be willing to make a donation and support any costs of his medical care.
For what it is worth, I don't really place so much faith that this is any sort of majority view of the people protesting against the government (to beat up a single person) any more than a small minority of the red shirt mob who were in 2009 then again in 2010 "rioting in the streets, shooting people and assaulting various people because they didn't like who the majority the country had voted into power in 2007"
I really hope that people understand that this is not a black and white situation; that either you are against the rule of democracy, or you support the current government. Not only is it a nonsensical false dichotomy but it also ignores the very real grievances on BOTH sides.
I can only hope that cooler heads prevail, but given that there was no consequence for violence/trespass/etc in 2006,7,9,10, it seems like the current way of doing whatever it takes and then going back and fiddling the law/court process to ensure no consequence is proving a true dead end. I suppose arguably the precedent was set in the asset declaration interference case - lean on the courts to get what you want and ignore the rule of law.
This is why amnesty is always a crappy, crappy idea. Those responsible should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
- 2
Red-shirt core leader Kwanchai shot
in Thailand News
Posted
While I don't agree with his methods and have had my own personal confrontation with his group, I wish the best for him and hope his family are with his at this time.
Let's hope the shooter(s) are brought to justice - too many of these types of colour coded crimes are going unpunished - further evidence why amnesty is not the way forward - for any action there must be consequence in a court of law.