RuamRudy

The law and all decent minded people find your regular attempts to minimise the rape of children by rich white men disgusting.

Trump really seems to relish that taco moniker.

Am I correct in understanding your logic here: children exploited by Asian men are victims; children exploited by rich white men are prostitutes?

Palestinian action are clowns who should be punished to the fullest extent of the law. To classify them as terrorists is, however, a gross and obscene distortion of what true terrorism actually is. Also, these clowns have made themselves the headlines. They claim to be acting in support of the Palestinian cause but all they do is further enable those who want to see the eradication of it by distracting attention and furthering the suggestion that the cause itself is not a just one.

Pick any of them. Who did they set out to terrorise?

Of course it's there for multiple reasons, including as a deterent against dissent. In this case, who in particular was terrorised by the acts carried out by this group?

What they did had nothing to do with terrorism - just because the law says otherwise doesn't make it so; just another bad law written by weak politicians.

Thank you, I am now better informed. It does feel, however, that equating the actions of a pressure group with those who set out to deliberately kill innocent people is an abuse of the term.

Is that the name of an English law or just a phrase you cobbled together?

Which law defines the escalation of a charge from vandalism to terrorism based upon the financial cost of the attack? What other acts of violence have they carried out?

If this protest group begins to plant bombs, behead people and commit other such atrocities then certainly. By the same token, should all people who commit acts of vandalism on public property be labelled terrorists?

Interestingly, 5 years ago Sultana backed a bill that would compel an MP who changed parties to be subject to a recall petition, and if 10% of their electorate backed it, the seat would be declared vacant. I wonder will she honour her previous convictions.

We already have laws in place to prosecute them for their actions. Why do we need to label them terrorists?

So, as usual, you have nothing to offer except the appearance of a thoroughly unpleasant person. What a sad way to live your life.

Then provide a credible source to dispute it.