Jump to content

rabas

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    5,062
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rabas

  1. 14 hours ago, beautifulthailand99 said:

    Sorry, Budanov says no. That said, the combination of deprivations that the Putin regime subjected him to and his prolonged fastings certainly killed him in the end. RIP. Why Budanov unhelpfully challenges the Western dominant narrative at this juncture is anybody's guess. But I will have a go !

     

    He doesn't want Navalny to be a martyr. Ever since Navalny's death, the Ukrainian leadership has been very busy reminding everyone that he wasn't a saint. They seem to view it as a problem that in the Western perception the important part is that you're anti Putin, not where you stand on the issue of Crimea.

    I guess that ultimately their worry is that the West would be too willing to deal with a nationalistic replacement if anything should ever happen to Putin - which is not entirely unreasonable, the whole "Putin's war" trope creates room for exactly that possibility.

     

    Also, from that post up thread that the Kyiv Independent wrote they tellingly quoted this ;


    We should also not forget that it is the very same Navalny who, following the unprovoked Russian invasion of Georgia in 2008, wrote that he would “really like to hit the rodents at the (Georgian) General Staff with a cruise missile” and advocated for providing military assistance to now Russian-occupied South Ossetia and Abkhazia, not to mention a “complete” Russian blockade of Georgia.

     

     

    https://www.kyivpost.com/post/28630

     

    “I may disappoint you, but as far as we know, he indeed died as a result of a blood clot. And this has been more or less confirmed,” Budanov told journalists on the sidelines at the “Ukraine. Year of 2024” forum on Sunday.

    "This wasn't sourced from the internet, but, unfortunately, natural [causes],” he added.

     

    I don't disagree with your analysis of Budanov's motives. I assumed he views Navalny as a distraction from more noble causes. Keeping his name and his wife out of politics in case Putin loses his grip on power makes sense. 

     

    • Agree 2
  2. 14 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

     

    It's a sample of a general sentiment which can be verified everywhere. You are part of an ever-shrinking minority (thankfully).

     

    "It's everywhere, I saw it on the internet", he said.

     

    You so far have proven nothing. Maybe a good time to remember the wise words of Richard Feynman: 

     

    “It does not matter who you are, or how smart you are, or what title you have, or how many of you there are, and certainly not how many papers your side has published, if your prediction is wrong then your hypothesis is wrong. Period.”

     

    There is no quantitative proof, even reliable data, to suggest the vaccines benefits did not far out weigh low levels of side effects, many of which are due to the virus SARS-2 not mRNA technology. [ref1,ref2,ref3]  Ref3: "heart, kidney, liver, brain, and gastrointestinal tract."

     

    Richard Feynman was a master contrarian but I admire him because he was laser focused on truth. 

     

  3. 4 hours ago, herfiehandbag said:

    Tactical nuclear weapons ( small nukes) were always the NATO option in the Cold War scenario when their conventional forces had been overwhelmed. We always wondered on which river/canal line or feature they would have been used on, Weser, Paderborn gap, almost certainly the Rhine; if the Russians had come ( "When Ivan comes over the IGB..")

     

    Russian policy is exactly the same. Perhaps they are likely to go nuclear earlier.

     

    True. But the West had neutron bombs. A neutron bomb has a very small 'blast' but puts out a vast burst of invisible neutron radiation that can kill tank crews with little damage to  tanks or other major infrastructure.

     

    This was done because it was inconceivable NATO would invade Russia thus the battle would be on NATO territory. (You can count on Russia being the bad guy) 

     

    You can see from Eastern Ukraine that Putin cares nothing for people. The only way to stop him is to demonstrate how he will be defeated. 

     

    • Agree 1
  4. 8 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

    "I too would love to see a strong, free Russia. Best thing for the world. Would you join me in calling for a Putin free Russia so that it can happen?"

     

    How about minding your own business and leaving Russia to the Russians, the vast majority of which (over 80%) support their president?

     


    Vladimir Putin’s Approval Rating Remains Sky High. Here’s Why.
    https://globelynews.com/russia/putin-approval-rating/

     

    I only reflect on the hopes and fears of lifelong Russian friends, not mine, not bias selected media.

     

    You might look at your own motives. A few posters simply run on high octane anti Western fuel, and even Russian propaganda.

    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...