Jump to content

rabas

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    5,078
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by rabas

  1. 8 hours ago, rattlesnake said:

    "I too would love to see a strong, free Russia. Best thing for the world. Would you join me in calling for a Putin free Russia so that it can happen?"

     

    How about minding your own business and leaving Russia to the Russians, the vast majority of which (over 80%) support their president?

     


    Vladimir Putin’s Approval Rating Remains Sky High. Here’s Why.
    https://globelynews.com/russia/putin-approval-rating/

     

    I only reflect on the hopes and fears of lifelong Russian friends, not mine, not bias selected media.

     

    You might look at your own motives. A few posters simply run on high octane anti Western fuel, and even Russian propaganda.

    • Agree 1
  2. 54 minutes ago, rattlesnake said:

     

    He was a convicted crook who had a long-standing history of corruption and embezzlement with his brother Oleg. 

    Russian investigators accuse Alexei and Oleg Navalny of defrauding a Russian subsidiary of the French cosmetics company Yves Rocher out of about 26m roubles (about $811,000; £505,000). 

    [...]

    In a further charge, the Navalny brothers are charged with laundering 21m roubles (about $656,000, £408,000) in funds.

    [...]

    In that case, he was found guilty of heading a group that embezzled timber worth 16m roubles from the Kirovles state timber company, while working as an adviser to the governor of the Kirov region, Nikita Belykh.
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-24731503

     

    Hero anyway, or maybe even because of...

     

    His 'convictions' were suspended but came at critical times as he was was running for election against Putin cronies. 

     

    WIKI "Both criminal cases were widely considered politically motivated and intended to bar him from running in future elections[15][16]  

     

    Maybe even Super Hero for his efforts against Vladimir Putin. 

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  3. 4 hours ago, placeholder said:

    I knew about her but I guess it depends on what is meant by "proven". Since Tyndall's results were definitive I went with him.

     

    You need to prove that prove has multiple meanings.  Did you read her paper?  She both proved it by elegantly simple experiment and clearly saw the atmosphere/climate implications. She also discovered H2O moisture had a large effect and that condensation would be difficult to treat quantitatively, just like today's climate folks who start hand-waving at the mention of water. She got the whole study in a nutshell. 

     

    "She was the first scientist to conclude that certain gases warmed when exposed to sunlight, and that rising carbon dioxide (CO2) levels would change atmospheric temperature and could affect climate, a phenomenon now referred to as the Greenhouse effect."  WIKI

     

    Tyndall worked to advance and prove parts of the model, particularity how CO2 absorbs bands of IR, but full understanding only came after the discovery of quantum physics. 

    • Thanks 1
×
×
  • Create New...