Jump to content

candide

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    17,240
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Recent Profile Visitors

12,833 profile views

candide's Achievements

Star Member

Star Member (12/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • 10 Posts
  • Very Popular Rare

Recent Badges

31.3k

Reputation

  1. Russian propaganda. Zelinski is legally the President according to Ukraine's constitution.
  2. In case I wasn't clear enough. The inegibility sanction is not optional, it is mandatory. The judges (they were three) have to apply it. They are not allowed to decide otherwise.
  3. What is the Big Lie.... https://www.google.com/search?q=trump's+big+lie&client=firefox-b-1-d&sca_esv=94c74ca6f52d2cb2&ei=cuTrZ6PsGJmf4-EP6p_qwAY&oq=trump's+big+lie&gs_lp=EhNtb2JpbGUtZ3dzLXdpei1zZXJwIg90cnVtcCdzIGJpZyBsaWVI1G5QvQlYsWhwAXgAkAEBmAGjAqABwB6qAQYwLjI0LjK4AQPIAQD4AQGYAhGgAusVqAIPwgICECnCAgUQLhiABMICBRAAGIAEwgIKEC4YgAQYQxiKBcICCxAuGIAEGMcBGK8BwgILEC4YgAQY0QMYxwHCAgwQKRiABBgKGEYYgALCAgUQKRiABMICChAAGIAEGEMYigXCAgYQABgWGB7CAgcQABiABBgTwgIIEAAYExgWGB7CAgoQABgTGBYYChgemAMf8QVRpx1wRt3AiogGAZIHBjEuMTQuMqAH-fMB&sclient=mobile-gws-wiz-serp
  4. B.S.! Judges have to apply the law. The law is clear and the evidence is unambiguous. A law which was voted by lawmakers to prevent politicians from being corrupt.
  5. That's harsh but that's the law. It has been voted after some corruption scandal and is very strict. Politicians from a party supporting Macron have been previously sanctioned for exactly the same reason. Le Pen's problem is that, as she is a autocratic party leader, she decides and give orders about the way the money is spent, which person to recruit, etc... so there is unambiguous written evidence. Unlike the current case about Sarkozy, there is no need for interpretation as there is significant written evidence. The irony is that, like most other far-right politician, she's been complaining for years about corrupt and roten politicians and has been calling for a strict application of laws! πŸ˜†
  6. Surprise! That's exactly what Russia is claiming.... πŸ˜†
  7. No. It's about the fact that the U.S. is not being invaded and bombed by Russia. The false equivalence between the U.S. and Ukraine is ridiculous. BTW, does the U.S. constitution forbid to hold elections under martial law?
  8. More ridiculous false equivalence from you...
  9. A month ago, Trump was just echoing Putin's propaganda. Now he pretends to be offended by it and threatens what? Tariffs on oil imports from Russia! Putin must be worried about it...
  10. Uh! Forgot to take your meds again?
  11. For those who don't know it already, a little gem. Watch how grand dad is passionate and overflowing with energy!
  12. Wasn't he a Democrat? πŸ™‚
  13. Scene 3: blame Zelinski! πŸ™‚
  14. Exactly! Look at the ridiculous sanctions he's threatening Putin with. Tariffs on oil imports from Russia! 🀣
Γ—
Γ—
  • Create New...