Jump to content

Srikcir

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    21,693
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Srikcir

  1. On 7/1/2025 at 10:26 AM, KhunLA said:

    as long as they keep banning cars from CH via tariffs

    Tariffs do not ban imports.

    But irrational tariffs like Trump's 50%-400% tariffs will  discourage imports because the import country cannot sell the inflated priced products due to tariff charge addition and thus will not order imported products.

  2. 14 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

    The debt was only a problem when the President was a Democrat.

     

     

     

     

    "Since World War II, according to many economic metrics including job creation, GDP growth, stock market returns, personal income growth, and corporate profits, the United States economy has performed significantly better on average under the administrations of Democratic presidents than Republican presidents."

    Many sources.

    • Agree 2
  3. On 7/2/2025 at 12:54 PM, KhunBENQ said:

    I have shown Bangkok Bank statements printed, stamped and signed at the branch.

    When I was on the 12 monthly foreign deposits method, in addition to the KB summary of the 12 monthly deposits 65k (usually greater), I went to the KB once a month to collect the twelve associated Credit Account Reports (CAR) that will match with each of the twelve foreign transfer deposits coded in your passbook.

    I now have a LTR visa so no longer need to prove foreign transfers.

  4. 19 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

    Pham underscored that any research or survey operations by foreign powers in these areas without Vietnam's consent are breaches of its sovereign rights and jurisdiction.

    Incorrect with regard to breach of sovereign rights and jurisdiction beyond 12 nautical miles from the baseline, wherein the coastal state has absolute sovereignty. 

    24 nautical miles from the baseline, the coastal state has limited sovereignty to enforce laws related to customs, taxation, immigration, and sanitation, according to the International Maritime Organization. But not outright blanket sovereignty, ie., prevent foreign intrusion.

    200 nautical miles from the baseline, where the coastal state has sovereign rights only over natural resources (e.g., fishing, oil, gas). But cannot deny freedom of travel to the extent of conducting survey lines of sight; however, a survey of seabed and/or beneath seabed for potential resource extraction would not be (I believe) considered legal freedom of travel. 

    (1 nautical mile = 1.852 Km = 1.15 miles)

    • Thumbs Up 1
  5. 20 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

    the military's current commitment to reform, rather than interference, marks a significant shift in Thailand's governance landscape.

    Then require a permanent 100% elected Senate. Will the military commit to having no military appointed to the Senate nor military selected in the Senate?

    That would be a "significant shift in Thailand's governance landscape."

    • Agree 1
    • Thumbs Up 1
  6. 7 hours ago, dinsdale said:

    Dissolve both houses. Fresh national elections for both houses. CC and EC remains a problem as they are clearly are  arm of the military establishment. A coup is looking more and more likely IMO.

    The "Thai Senate cannot be dissolved. It has a fixed, non-renewable, five-year term. The Senate members are appointed, not elected, and serve their full term regardless of the political climate." (Google)

    Incidentally, the Senate members have been selected by pro-military committees.

    The House can be dissolved by a House majority no-confidence vote or by the PM. Then a national election must be held (apart from a military coup in 2014).

    But as we've seen twice now since 2023 (I believe) the CC can unilaterally remove the PM without dissolving the House (thus preserving present House majority) and the House majority then selects the PM. No messy national election results that otherwise might give the People's Party a majority coalition.

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  7. 1 hour ago, Zakhar said:

    Insurgents? Can't say it loud as Muslim Separatists?

    Correct, can't call them Muslim Separatists.

    An insurgency is a rebellion

    They are Malay Muslims who seek to REGAIN their former nation's sovereignty the Kingdom of Patani that was forcefully annexed by Buddhist Thailand in violation of a Peace Treaty to become a Thailand Province. Since 2014 the Thai government has allegedly sought peace negotiations but to date - nothing.

    They are not separatists seeking to create a new Muslim state.

    • Thumbs Down 1
    • Thanks 1
  8. 11 hours ago, Social Media said:

    Indigenous Australians

    They are not Australians but Aboriginal Natives.

    Much like the American Indian is not American but one of the many indigenous natives such as the Black Foot, Apache and Mohawks. 

    They were and are "nations" with their own languages, histories, and cultural traditions. 

    In Thailand they were Malay Muslims of the Kingdom of Patani but after forced annexation into the Kingdom of Siam they became Thai Malay Muslims

  9. 4 hours ago, Emdog said:

    too many envelopes already distributed and spent. Chinese engines should be good enough.

    Substantial down payment was paid years ago under the Prayut regime and his "arranged" Parliament approved an installment plan to payoff the balance of the acquisition. That plan cannot be altered nor delayed without agreement from China.

    So whatever the current Parliament decides now is already committed.

    The so-called "Chinese engine" is actually Chinese generator that will be modified to operate as a propulsion engine. China will certify the "engine" as functional (?) but note that China does not use the generator on any of its submarines as an engine!  So what is a certification really worth?

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...