Jump to content

scottiejohn

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    6,354
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by scottiejohn

  1. Attorney: Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
    Witness: No.
    Attorney: Did you check for blood pressure?
    Witness: No.
    Attorney: Did you check for breathing?
    Witness: No.
    Attorney: So, then, is it possible that the patient was still alive when you began the autopsy?
    Witness: No.
    Attorney: How can you be so sure, doctor?
    Witness: Because his brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
    Attorney: I see, but could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
    Witness: Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.

    • Like 1
  2. 15 minutes ago, Pilotman said:

    Too literal an interpretation I would say,  for most trained and experienced pilots. However,  by your restricted definition, I am still entitled to use the term,  as I do hold a current set of licences and ratings.  

    What is restricted in my definition? 

    You are either a qualified pilot or you are not!

    You say you hold a valid licence and ratings etc therefore you are a pilot. 

    As I no longer maintain any ratings or licences for any type of aircraft (including boys toys!) as such, I cannot 'Pilot an aircraft', therefore I cannot call myself a pilot.    What is the problem with those definitions?

  3. 1 hour ago, JAFO said:

    Ahhh Gee Scottie......Little.....! what would you lead us to believe....Hands? Feet?...

     

    Still think you have "Drone Envy. You should fly one. They are a lot of fun, so are fast cars, fast motorcycles, sky diving, and host of other hobbies.  

    Try brain, if you have one!

    BTW I am an ex Pilot, hence my hatred of drones. I also drive sports cars, dive and ride hoses etc.

    I suggest you do not make assumptions about people you do not know anything about.

×
×
  • Create New...