PremiumLane

4 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Now that was a really compelling argument. 

now that is copium

5 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Made an unsupported claim that he ran away from one debate, and think that somehow proves that he "...runs away from debates..."

 

Typical tactic of the left. 

 

I did not say "oh the left are unreasonable" either, so you are still making stuff up. 

Hmmm, I'm really shocked that you have to resort to name calling...

 

You made a few unsupported, off topic claims. That's pretty weak.

 

 

Well so far I have provided lots of reasons to back up my claim that JP is a clown, all you have done is whinge and cry and engaged in a hell of a lot of projection. Suck it up, buttercup, your boy is an idiot  ???? 

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

But like most leftists, you are unable to actually formulate a coherent argument, so you make statements like "Peterson is an utter clown" and make things up about what others say. 

Oh look, another "coherent argument" - how about the fact that he actually uses the phrases "post-modern Marxist" and if you have any understanding of Marxism you would know how dumb that phrase is.  

Also, his use of "cultural Marxism" a well know conspiracy theory cooked up by the soup-brains of the far-right and literal Nazis. It is a nonsense vapid phrase, banded around by people who don't know what they are talking about. 

I am not a Marxist, but at least I have read Marx and know enough about his theories to literally laugh when JP starts waffling on like a 12-grader with no understanding of the subject. 

And how about his claims that people were going to be locked up in Canada for misgendering people. His claims on this were so obtuse and disingenuous that even the law society of Canada had to issue a statement basically saying that JP doesn't know what he is talking about.  

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Yeah, if he were a leftist, he never would have admitted there was anything he did not know. 

that literally makes no sense

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

So why does the left refuse to debate him? 

they don't, that is the point, it is JP that runs away from debates... try learning to read

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I never said "oh the left are reasonable"

error, was meant to say unreasonable, it is the usual boring shtick from JP fanboys 

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

But like most leftists, you are unable to actually formulate a coherent argument, so you make statements like "Peterson is an utter clown" and make things up about what others say. 

I literally gave you reasons why he is a clown, I mean, I can go into more if you really want. And like most JP fanboys you are incapable of actual reading

10 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

Another clear, concise and well thought out response from the left. 

Oh you mean like when he debated Slavoj Zizek and clearly didn't know anything about the subject and admitted he hadn't even read Marx. 

Or, how about him whinging on Joe Rogan about how the "left" won't debate him. Which is funny considering how poorly he did with Slavoj Zizek and how he ran away from a debate with the economist Richard Wolff. Shall we also bring up his embarrassing claims to Matt Dillahunty about addiction and god? 

And then there is his melt down and Benzos addiction, and let's not forget his inane vapid posting on social media, or his cozying up to the fascists (and before you start winning, it is funded by right-wing backers and has self-proclaimed fascists as hosts)  on the Daily Wire.

So your "oh the left are reasonable" response is laughable 

On 10/3/2023 at 3:32 PM, GammaGlobulin said:

I cannot say that I am in complete agreement with Jordan Peterson's thinking concerning IQ.

 

What about YOU?

 

Do you agree, disagree, or differ in important ways, with Jordan' views about IQ, the importance of IQ in daily living, and the importance of IQ in determining the mix of IQ in the workplace?

 

Please be specific in replying to Jordan's IQ points...

 

Also, enjoy these short UTUBE videos made by Jordan...

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peterson is an utter clown

3 hours ago, TroubleandGrumpy said:

And someone whining about them.

aww did you get triggered?

2 hours ago, novacova said:

I don’t know about the UK, but for the US it’s Open Borders!!

Only in the fevered cheese dreams of the dumb

18 hours ago, DrJack54 said:

No to first part and for international travel also not required if returning with reentry permit or same visa.

Two people at my work were told different. When they went to do their extensions it was flagged that they had left the country and not filed new TM30s when they had returned, so they were fined for that. Both on Non-B and with reentry permits. This was at CW.

As others have said, every office has their own rules. 

On 9/26/2023 at 9:55 AM, owl sees all said:

But are the claims true? And if they are, does it make the jabs more toxic? And does that even matter? If they are not true; does it matter, apart from being incorrect.

 

Don't bother me if there is even more undesirables in the jabs. Others might. But one things for sure; plenty will emerge to rubbish any claims. Why might that be!

 

Have to think things through.

here is a shocker, no they are not true 

34 minutes ago, AgMech Cowboy said:

Yes... Life is more interesting here. There are fewer people with pink &/or purple hair, fewer nose rings (especially the ones that hang on the columella (like on a cow)), the gays & trans people are 'mostly' not aggressive and the women are still women here. And the Thai's know what a woman is. (they seem to have a problem with that in the 1st world countries).

is the woke in the room with you now?

13 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

no published papers, just internet accounts of their research.

 

No peer review.

 

How did they say they got their samples? "I know a guy".

 

perfect summary 

3 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

The main issue was whether the mRNA stayed at the injection site as Public Health authorities told us, or whether it was distributed through your body. 

This Lancet study confirms that the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is NOT confined to the injection site but spreads systemically and is packaged into breast-milk EVs.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(23)00366-3/fulltext?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Before you sable down the above:

Yes, the researchers 'believe' (their words) that breastfeeding post-vaccination is safe.

And yes, your very specific statement might well be true (no detection of serum in breastfed infants), but the fact that mRNA is NOT confined to the injection site and widely distributed in the body of those that took the shots cannot be denied.

and you do know that the immune reaction to ingested mRNA is zero even for non-trace amounts?

3 hours ago, Red Phoenix said:

The main issue was whether the mRNA stayed at the injection site as Public Health authorities told us, or whether it was distributed through your body. 

This Lancet study confirms that the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is NOT confined to the injection site but spreads systemically and is packaged into breast-milk EVs.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/ebiom/article/PIIS2352-3964(23)00366-3/fulltext?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

Before you sable down the above:

Yes, the researchers 'believe' (their words) that breastfeeding post-vaccination is safe.

And yes, your very specific statement might well be true (no detection of serum in breastfed infants), but the fact that mRNA is NOT confined to the injection site and widely distributed in the body of those that took the shots cannot be denied.

It is safe, so what is the problem?

9 hours ago, MrMojoRisin said:

Thailand has one of the most unequal wealth distributions in the world - the top one percent possess nearly three quarters of the wealth whilst the poorest fifty percent possess less than two percent of the wealth.

wait till you find out about America 

And as much as Ramsay can be a dick sometimes, you can't accuse him of serving slop 

3 hours ago, impulse said:

And they know the new bivarient vaccine will be safe and effective, how?  Never mind the possibility of long term effects.  Like mine...

 

Also just saw that the mRNA makes it into breast milk.   As I recall, that just couldn't happen...  Because it stays in your arm.  Oops.  Got that one wrong, too.

 

Because they test them and monitor for safety. 

mRNA has not been detected in the serum of any breastfed infants. [23-26] mRNA has an estimated serum half-life of 8 to 10 hours and was not detected in milk beyond 48 hours in one group of women

1 minute ago, impulse said:

I'm still confused.  If a vaccinated person can still get Covid and pass it on, isn't it just as likely she'd catch it from someone who has been vaxxed?  I mean, given that the majority of the people she's likely to run into have been vaxxed...

 

As someone who, 2.75 years later, is still suffering a life changing vaccine injury, I'm curious.  Not that I plan to get the new vax.  That would just be stupid, given what happened the last time.  They'd have to hold a gun to my head to make me.

 

Nope, Covid vaccines do reduce transmission - what you do see though is new variants coming through, hence the bivarient vaccine and new boosters - like the flu vaccine. They also massively reduce serious health problems from the virus and deaths, the data shows this very clearly. 

Misleading: While SV40 is known to cause cancer in certain animals like hamsters, epidemiological studies didn’t find an elevated risk of cancer in people who received SV40-contaminated polio vaccine.

Inadequate support: Neither the preprint by McKernan et al. nor the other studies cited in the article provided evidence for the claim that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines contained significant DNA contamination or that the vaccines can alter DNA in people. The analysis underpinning this claim was performed on vials of unknown origin.

In short, the study they are quoting is garbage