PremiumLane

3 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

What facts are you dealing with?  I am handicapped and I travel and I have always been accommodated... those are facts. 

Other than you made up a scenario in your head to <deleted> on another disabled person, way to go 

"A 2021 report from the Transportation Research Board, as part of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine, proved that airlines can install in-cabin wheelchair securement systems in airplanes. These systems would allow passengers to remain in their chairs for the duration of flights. Those with disabilities would not be forced out of their wheelchair to be carried to an airline seat, and they would no longer run the risk of breaking their wheelchair in the cargo hold. If airlines remove just two rows of seats near the front of the plane, the proposed securement system would work."

We bailed the airlines out with billions, yet it is profit over service when it comes to disabled people. 

Millions come to visit, you are going to have some problems with some of them - it is hardly a crime wave involving tourists. Plus, there are laws in place to prosecute people if they do what they listed as being targeted. But of course, knee jerk reactions and the authorities <deleted>ting their panties again 

7 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

Your assumption is totally skewed... they have procedures and equipment to help disabled people travel... I use them all the time... And yes the best airlines make a profit.

No it is not, cos I am dealing with facts - plenty of reports on this. While you are dealing with your emotions and feel feels and basically making stuff up in your head to get mad about. 

7 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

When you wake up let us know...

won't that mean I am woke then? 

1 hour ago, Cabradelmar said:

What's great about the Thai legal system is that bull<deleted> arguments won't be entertained.

money is entertained though

On 3/15/2024 at 5:34 AM, Skipalongcassidy said:

No to a disabled person having to travel with someone else... yes to a disabled person who cannot care for himself having to travel with a caregiver... it is not the job of airline personnel to provide special care.

This traveler was probably trying to get the reaction from the airline by showing up and demanding that the airlines be responsible for caring for him... his friends all refused as a grandstand move to pressure the airlines... he was setting himself up as the "VICTIM" of the rules in place that he thought were demeaning to him rather than the rules being for the safety of everyone on board. 

Very clear evidence that the airlines can put in procedures and equipment to help disabled people travel, but I guess their shareholders just need more profit, right?

Victim blaming again on this forum, I am shocked 

17 hours ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Funny how you post this as evidence of people being stuck being wheelchairs, then ask another poster if there were any wheelchairs on board... what a genius 

7 hours ago, Skipalongcassidy said:

It is NOT discrimination to require those that require special care to provide it by traveling with a caregiver... this was a setup by a handicapped person who felt slighted because the airlines did not and would not provide him special treatment as he so thought he deserved.  I am handicapped and I follow the rules and have never been denied boarding and have always been treated well... you get back what you put forth... the victim mentality is sickening. 

How is that victim mentality? So a disabled person must always travel with someone else? And how was it a set up? 

6 hours ago, Rampant Rabbit said:

I  look  forward to even more heads buried in phones , zombie  world

OK boomer

5 hours ago, SAFETY FIRST said:

s he an Aussie, looks dark, aboriginal 🤔

Jesus wept..... 

4 hours ago, jacko45k said:

They used to be very much a homogenous nation, killing off any who didn't fit the blonde and blue-eyed preference. Times have changed......

Source? Fevered cheese dream

15 minutes ago, In the jungle said:

 

Because F1 management demand huge sums of money to give a country hosting rights to an F1 race.

 

It is the reason why you have F1 races in god awful places like Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Azerbaijan.

Do they demand it from countries in Europe and the USA?

2 hours ago, findlay13 said:

Another Quality Tourist

It ain't Aseannow Forum without that trope 

2 hours ago, In the jungle said:

Zero chance F1 is coming to Thailand.

Why? They host Motogp, World Superbikes, Asian Le Mans Series, Super GT etc. already. 

3 hours ago, FruitPudding said:

 

I think the latter is worse 

Agreed, and she has been charged with it

2 hours ago, VinnieK said:

Double standards..

That's what it has to do with it.

Let's see what the penalty will be for the driver..

(Don't hold your breath.)

Well it will be a bit difficult to deport her, so there is that for a start.

Are you saying kicking someone in the back is equal to manslaughter due to negligent driving? 

This has got all the boomers all excited on here 

On 2/29/2024 at 8:27 PM, steven100 said:

as usual you don't follow ....   lol

 

no ..... it could be that they're lying about what restaurant actually caused the allergic reaction. 

have day off

They do love a bit of victim blaming in this forum