PremiumLane

18 hours ago, CharlieKo said:

That's not freedom. It is a mental illness! 

Sure, buttercup, keep crying about it

Anyone who uses "Dr" John Cambbell as a source, should just be laughed at.  The dude is a moron. Check our Debunk the Funk and Dr. Susan Oliver for the debunking of Cambell's moronic takes on vaccines and Covid. 

20 hours ago, smedly said:

excess deaths still need an explanation which has not been forthcoming 

They have, it was called Covid, now please do show the evidence that it was vaccines.... 

6 hours ago, transam said:

But folk like you prefer an ice cream van thing placed there as being important whilst probably munching your Big Mac

Who are folk like me then? People who don't get outraged by made up <deleted>? I will give you that one 🙂

4 hours ago, scottiejohn said:

Wrong.  That only started at the end of the 1990's!

The fourth plinth is the northwest plinth in Trafalgar Square in central London. Was built in 1841.

It was originally intended to hold an equestrian statue of William IV, but remained bare due to insufficient funds.

In 1998,  three contemporary sculptures were commissioned to be displayed temporarily on the plinth.

A tradition that has been continued till today!

(the above has ben edited) 

Fourth plinth - Wikipedia

So, I am not wrong then, cos as stated it is used as rotating art piece.... the tradition that continues till today 🙂 

"The fourth plinth in Trafalgar Square has been used for a wide variety of art projects. 

Many such projects are currently being considered, and the Mayor of London has not, and does not, express any opinion on them."

Fake outrage from GBNews snd The Express, to get idiots frothed up

5 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

Plenty of bigotry from the Wokeists.

 

Let's start with their attitude towards...

 

• Jews/Israel.
• Conservatives (especially if they are black, cue the "Uncle Tom" and "superficially black" insults).
• Cultural appropriation (one direction only, they have no issue with black women straightening their hair for example).
• Those who reject identity politics.
• "Positive" discrimination (a synonym for supporting discrimination against white people).
• People who believe in the nation state/borders.
• People who believe in biological reality e.g. believe women do not have male genitalia or that men cannot be pregnant.

In fact, pretty much anyone who does not subscribe to their own Woke beliefs.

 

I'd argue the more Woke someone is, the more bigoted they are.

 

As for educated and enlightened? I'd say ignorant, dogmatic, sanctimonious, pretentious, gullible and neophilic are more accurate descriptions. 

 

 

 

 

 

Criticism of Israel doesn't make you anti Jewish

Toughen up, snowflake

Only idiots go on about cultural appropriation, and hardly anyone does, just more fake outrage

Conservatives love identify politics - look at Trump supporters

Again, mostly made up bs and isolated cases, no systemic oppression of white people, as I as a hardcore lefty would call it out if it happened

People have different opinions on borders sometimes, suck it up, that is what free speech is about

Just cos yo don't understand actual biology, doesn't mean we have to humor your ignorance

Like most conservatives you come across as very fragile 

2 hours ago, bamnutsak said:

 

I don't think the "whinger" (you in this case) ever thinks their "statements of facts" are whinges.

 

They are. You just lack the self-awareness to recognize it.

 

 

Well you tried

3 hours ago, transam said:

I think you misunderstood. 🙄

The anti-British in the UK, which includes SK, will love Queen Elizabeth II's memorial not being put on the plinth..... 

Is that clearer for you...........🤭

 

Ah so you are just making up some fake outrage over something that isn't happening, cos it was always destined to be a rotating art piece, but you carry on 

On 2/19/2024 at 4:19 PM, transam said:

..........and anti-Brits.........

having a rotating arts exhibit is now anti-British? Well I never! 

On 2/19/2024 at 8:23 AM, Chomper Higgot said:

The outrage, the self stoked grievance fed outrage of it all.

 

The Express assumes its readers can be diverted by the use of the word ‘woke’ from recollecting that a 1998 public consultation, commissioned by the Secretary of State and undertaken by Sir John Mortimer concluded the Fourth Plinth should be reserved for the display of continually replaced artwork and should not be used for the placement of any permanent statue.

 

The Forth Plinth has since become a popular visitor destination for art lovers and tourists alike.

 

 

Can't let facts get in the way of the outrage machine. How will the poor little snowflake gammons survive without raging at "the woke" every morning over their cornflakes? 

Just now, bbi1 said:

Only you do that buddy. Thanks for sharing something with the forum that nobody wants to know about.

hahahaha on no, not the forum!!! How will I survive? 

11 hours ago, steven100 said:

 

then you should go live in Singapore ...  hahaha

Personally don't do any drugs, I am just not dumb enough to think criminalizing drug use stops it. 

11 hours ago, still kicking said:

Singapore is not a drug-free society, but it strives to be one. Singapore adopts a zero-tolerance approach to drugs, which means that it aims to prevent and eliminate drug abuse through a combination of preventive education, rigorous enforcement, and structured rehabilitation¹². Singapore’s drug laws are among the toughest in the world, and include the death penalty for certain drug offences³⁴. Singapore’s drug-control strategy has been effective in keeping the drug situation under control, as the number of drug abusers and drug-related crimes are relatively low compared to other countries⁵⁶. However, Singapore also faces challenges such as the changing drug landscape, the influence of online platforms, and the emergence of new psychoactive substances⁵. Therefore, Singapore remains vigilant and committed to achieving a drug-free society. 🇸🇬

No <deleted>, no one said it hasn't got harsh drug laws, but some people on here are making the asinine claim that Singapore is or has eradicated drug use cos of these harsh laws, the data says different. But I guess their feels are more important. 

On 2/17/2024 at 1:14 PM, still kicking said:

I never been in a fight all my life but maybe because I don't use weed?

Poe's Law 

On 2/16/2024 at 6:25 PM, steven100 said:

Singapore knows how to handle drug users ,  hence they don't go there. 

hahaha which is utter nonsense, but carry on

This got the boomers on here all frothed up 

5 hours ago, steven100 said:

yes but I don't think it's as high as you make out ...  you won't see any nutters laying around streets in Singapore.  You won't see anyone high as a kite walking around Singapore. You won't hear of any gold shop robberies because he needed to buy drugs ...  and so on.

Singapore has strict laws and policies when it's comes to drug use and possession.

They live by the rule that ...  if you use drugs don't come to Singapore.    They have the correct response and society's thinking on drug use imo.       anyway, each to his own.

Sorry the facts don't care about your feels 

13 minutes ago, steven100 said:

 

yes ... but not in Singapore ...

Don't think so "Unfortunately, CNB’s latest figures show that the number of new drug abusers remains high. Although there is an overall improvement in Singapore’s drug situation, there is still a record-high number of drug abusers. Individuals, who are aged between 20 and 29, continue to form the largest group of drug abusers in Singapore."

1 hour ago, hotchilli said:

So congested roads that traffic crawls along they want to reduce the speed limit for 80 to 50 ????

Not congested all the time

23 hours ago, kwilco said:

I've had to claim a couple of times and they settled over the phone in the hospital and I never paid a thing.

great, good for you, gold star