PremiumLane

2 hours ago, from the home of CC said:

I was speaking to two other Brits who were wanted in the UK and were allowed just to walk away and commit crimes here. By helping him in getting bail they DID aid and abet him, and to me it's apparent that the government is getting totally dysfunctional on a lot of different fronts.. 

helping someone get bail is not aiding and abetting, do you seriously think the British Embassy, and they do have their faults, sat around and discussed how they could help this guy get away? Getting bail is part of the judicial process. And what have two other Brits got to do with these guys, so because others were criminals before they left, then these must be too... some strange logic you have there

1 hour ago, strawpanda said:

though they're not going to work for peanuts

and also in environments where there are little to no standards

1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:

Andrew seems to be not exactly the nice guy.

But what I find interesting in that case and in others: Why did that woman go with him?

Did she love him? No

Was she physically forced to go with him? It seems not.

Could she have walked away? It seems yes.

Was it about money and being together with rich guys? It seems so. That's called prostitution. 

It seems Epstein and Andrew did what lots of guys would do if they would have enough money: Surround themselves with lots of pretty girls and f$#% them whenever they wanted. And I am sure all those girls will have received a nice compensation because otherwise they wouldn't have done it.

try actually reading about the case, the kinds of girls that were targeted and how they felt about it... would help

20 minutes ago, jastheace said:

it is Friday. you not in prayer, you target for die.

welcome to multiculture Britain.

now why is it you won't make statements like that when it is a white dude committing a terrorist act? Statistically there are more terror incidents from far-right white people, so can we have witty comment about that?

People like yourself are as bad as this guy, you try to demonize whole communities to cause more violence, just two sides of the same coin. 

16 hours ago, Orton Rd said:

Almost everyone will be taxed more to pay for his straw clutching give a ways, even pensioners on 14k a year will pay 400 pounds a year more. He's a multi millionaire of course with an enormous pension and a member of the upper middle class, who although he goes on and on about the workers, has never actually been one himself.

actually he has made it clear that the super rich will be paying, got proof of your pensioners being taxed a lot more, and not from the Mail or the Sun ???? 

5 hours ago, Orton Rd said:

It does work if it's done properly dead dogs do not breed

show me a study that shows t works, cos it doesn't... they don't have the capacity to kill all the dogs for a start, who is going to kill them? Where are they going to kill them? Who decides which dogs are going to be killed? See, if you apply some critical thinking then it starts to show how difficult it would be.

Sterilization does bring populations down without the problems you have with 'culling', but yes, it does need to be more than just Soi Dog doing it, should be a government program 

2 hours ago, ezzra said:

With all due respect to all of those animal lovers and helpers that are trying very hard to act humanely and avoid sufferings, but there must be a point where too many feral dogs are just too many and some controlled culling should be considered, it is a necessary evil and it's done in many countries around the world...

except it doesn't work 

3 hours ago, Samui Bodoh said:

Simply put, Mother Nature Reigns. As long as an animal population has a food source, the animals will survive and multiply to meet that food source. And Soi Dogs have human garbage.

if they can't have babies, then they can't multiply.... which is what Soi Dog is doing, bringing the population down

7 minutes ago, Jane Dough said:

And Vietnam doesn't have food

blimey, what do people eat then? ???? 

3 hours ago, Thingamabob said:

Not any more...

I see the intellectuals are out...

1 hour ago, Sticky Wicket said:

He's about as welcome as Jeremy Corbyn at a Bar Mitzvah

so really welcome then? 

3 hours ago, Misterwhisper said:

People converting to Islam because they believe their debts will be wiped out;

people believing that this was actually true...

13 hours ago, Mitkof Island said:

Another foreign criminal in Thailand. Thousands more keep looking and tossing them out.

yeah, most of them working in banking and the financial industry ????

On 11/22/2019 at 7:45 PM, nickstav said:

Did you not read the article?

it is called sarcasm, you should try in sometimes ????

damn, that is ugly

1 hour ago, webfact said:

So where is the focus in the story? Who was the ‘star’? Was it the Governor of Chiang Rai province who we saw so often briefing the media? Was it the 23 year old assistant coach Ekkapol who carried a lot of the responsibility for the safety of his young players? Was it the divers who found the boys? Was it the Australian diver/doctors who came up with the risky evacuation plan? Was it the Navy Seal who lost his life whilst trying to rescue the 13 young men?

Talk about redundancy, did the writer have a target set for a minimum amount of words this should be, it is like something a school kid would write

1 hour ago, 4evermaat said:

Kasikorn bank K+ app also has ability to request 7-eleven withdrawals.   

probably won't be able to do it. I tried to do a deposit, at a 7-11, into my own bank account, I had my bank book and passport but was told 'No can, must be Thai person with Thai ID'

On 11/15/2019 at 7:23 AM, robblok said:

Farmers such lovely people if they dont poison you with chemicals then they kill you with other selfish actions.

 

I wonder were defenders of farmers like @farmerjo are they are so vocal on farmers rights but fail to see how selfish farmers are. Believing that farmermers will use chemicals properly and care for consumers while this is yet an other example of how its money first and others have to live with the concequences.

 

In a country like Thailand bans and harsh punishment are the only way to go. Just like how street vendors encrouch more and more leaving no room for people to walk. If only they respected others then bans were not needed and people self regulated  but its all about maximizing profit at the expense of others.

 

I understand the need to dry rice but then pay for a place to do so or find a safer free place. Its things like this that led me to believe that farmers wont use chemicals responsible. (And of course the results of tests of produces in markets and supermarkets).

 

I dont mind paying more for products if produced safe. But its not just farmers its also the police allowing this and testing agencies not doing much. If testing agencies were to be tough and check far mor fining and destroying batches of bad produces bans would not be needed.

 

you do know that organic farming can and do use chemicals, right? Also, just because something is a 'chemical' doesn't make it bad, everything is made of chemicals.