LolaS

On 5/21/2019 at 6:40 PM, Andrew Dwyer said:

Thanks, the reason I asked is, I went to my Amphur almost 2 years ago to get the yellow book, long story short: it didn’t work out !!

Someone on a thread on TVF suggested I went to the Tessabahn, which I did but don’t come under their jurisdiction as they cover only the city and I am in a district outside. ( I am on the outskirts of the city and 5 minutes from the Tessabahn but 30 minutes away from the Amphur )

But, a new building has appeared recently and the gf tells me it’s the Tessabahn so I was wondering if it was worth my time trying there.

 

You are obviously correct, I need to go and ask them.

ridiculous, every Amphur have some sort of administrative unit you should look it more into details.

On 5/20/2019 at 1:35 PM, jvs said:

The woman is not being honest,if you did not pay any money yet,walk away.

Every new house in Thailand receives a blue book,if it is lost not a big problem,can be replaced in a day.

i dont see why would she lied to me.

20 minutes ago, Sparkles said:

As others have said there must be a blue book.Obviously she is not being honest with you.

 

Are you having these converstions with her in Thai or English,is something being lost in translation or does she not the understand the 'rules"

 

Stay firm you are in the right if it comes to the crunch you hav every right to thrteaten to take some legal action to get her to comply.

 

I'm presuming no agent is involved

 

of course, no agent is involved. She told me she only has blue book for her own property where she resides aka lives, but not the houses and properties she has for purpose of renting, she has many apartments and houses in chiang mai, that is the problem.

54 minutes ago, ThaidDown said:

I suspect that there is a 'blue book' as it is usually required to get a permanent electric supply.

 

If the landlord is the owner but has never lived there then there maybe no names in the book.

Ref the 'yellow book' permission from the owner or designated house master is required to be registered at their address, you cannot just go and demand one.

 

 

she told me when she bought the house they never needed to do.

1 hour ago, transam said:

If the lady is legit she can get a copy of the blue book, somebody has it...The lady also knows she must tell immigration that you are living at her place..

 

If she is dodgy, not declaring earnings, then she will be evasive...If me I would tell her if she cannot provide a blue book copy you are off...If she complains then ask her to go to the land office to explain why she is renting with no blue book.

I think we are confusing here TM30 and yellow book application. I dont have problem with TM30, process went smoothly and fast, problem is at TESABAN office, it is requirement, however she doesnt have for the house I rent because nobody ever lived there. only rent

1 hour ago, Vacuum said:

Yes, I know it's OT. But you'll need a copy of the blue book and ID card to do it.

no need, only contract is enough, She reported for the first time in person, that was it. easy process.

Just now, Vacuum said:

How about the TM30?

that is a separate issue. not related. TM30 is obtained at immigration

3 minutes ago, jvs said:

She should go get the blue book and help you out,but ......

renting it out legally she will have to pay tax.

You can never have proof of residency if the owner does not have a blue book.

If she does not want to help you ,find another place to live.

 

but I already signed the contract. that is the problem.

hello, I moved from Su thep to Padeat recently and went to Tesaban office to make yellow book,

they required blue book from my landlord, however, she told me she doesn't have it.

Because she never lived in that house, it is only for renting so she never resides there and that is why she never needed to make blue book, Tabienban.

What should I do? I am so confused.

best regards

On 3/30/2019 at 5:38 PM, Lemonlime said:

um, I am looking for a vocational program... however do you know if they accept foreigners?

yes. you need to be more specific

https://www.ic.kku.ac.th/

5 hours ago, cmsally said:

I don't think drugs are the cause. Nowadays it would be drug factories rather than plantations. It is more amphetamines than opium poppy. Drug factories and smuggling routes are better covered by trees and foliage than smoke. If it were poppies we are also past the harvesting time so not much to see there.

I thought the same. but situation would suprise you. 

1 hour ago, canopy said:

First of all note that farm burning is just one ingredient of the smoke; other things get burned like forests and one use plastics by the millions. Now back to the farmers. Some people seem to have a need to justify the farmers burning their fields as somehow a necessity. But I am afraid there is no good justification. Burning is harmful to the soil and promotes top soil erosion. In the old days before chemical farming the farmers understood the importance of tilling the stalks for soil fertility. In our generation the stalks are now a waste product sent up in smoke to get rid of it. Interesting this year they tried something new with sugar cane in some places where they refused to buy cane that was burnt. The farmers then happily harvested and sold their cane green. Then what happened? The farmers went right back to the fields and burned them anyway which was astonishing since the excuse they had for burning up to that point was to make cane easier to harvest. Quite simply the people find enjoyment and convenience in burning. It's quick, easy, and to them burnt land looks better than weeds and things. That's why they do it. It doesn't matter that they make everyone sick. It's their land and they do as they please and if you were to complain about pollution they would say you are the problem for complaining. That's the psychology at work you need to understand.

 

 

No, the real reason is the drug production and smuggling in the border area of Burma, they cover their drug plantations and smuggling routes by producing smoke. The farmer you mention are few and exception. Real problems are drugs.

20 minutes ago, scorecard said:

I've never mentioned anything different on that specific point.

 

So are you saying they can do whatever they want or are you saying they (government funded universities) can just make their own regulations re employment contracts and more? 

 

 

they are exempt from labor law and financial laws that are applied to other entities. 

OMG, aqith show the picture even more alarming.  

Just now, scorecard said:

Seems that you want to play semantics.

 

Would you agree that many Thai universities were started under government edicts or whatever words you like to choose and these universities must follow set rules (such as employment regulations) and must follow the numerous regulations set down by OHEC?

negative, many financial and work(labor) rules are not applicable or exempt for universities. 

On 3/16/2019 at 10:19 PM, scorecard said:

I never said that universities are not allowed to hire foreigners, or anything even similar.

 

Again, it seems we have the point about pure government controlled / funded universities and the rules / regulations involved re employment contracts, compared to universities that sit outside of pure government controlled / funded universities and possibly quite different ownership.

 

 

there are no government-controlled universities in Thailand, they have autonomy and are funded by the package or budget allocation.  

On 3/18/2019 at 3:25 PM, manchega said:

still not seen an example of such a contract.  you can redact all personal info. I have no interest in knowing your wage...... I know exactly what the top uni - there is only one in thaialnd offers

but they do not have a long term contract, or if they do it has only come about very very recently and that is at a thai wage - 40 k or less a month , don't beleive you get the big housing allocation anymore and 

I also beleieve the contract to require signing every year along with renewal of visa every year

they have longterm contracts, yes they are thai wage but I dont see the problem with that. You are wrong, only contract that is sign every year is for part-time positions, adjunct, and foreign language positions. so-called non-tenure track 

1 hour ago, scorecard said:

I have shared many times information which comes direct and clear from the director of my uni., a full mainstream government controlled uni. And I've had the exact same details from old colleagues from other full mainstream government controlled unis., where I have worked previously.

 

You claim it's incorrect, and in areas where several universities say something consistent but you claim it's incorrect. 

 

One difference, which I mentioned many days ago, is in terms of length of contracts etc., being perhaps different at full state mainstream government unis., compared to other unis., run under different controls / ownerships. I didn't notice any response from you. 

 

I don't intend to play any games with you, just trying to get a clear understanding. 

 

 

show the proof that universities are not allowed to hire foreigners... utter nonsense. and they can also have long term contracts.

15 hours ago, scorecard said:

Just not true, are you sure your referring to Thailand?

so you have any proof?

3 hours ago, manchega said:

worked at at least 2 of those, some of them have never heard of so probably not in top 10 country university.

where is the contract indicating tenure position as opposed to signing a new one every year, which we did at chula

 

also what nonsense is this about tenure position and work permits

 

not needing work permit is one thing - but its assocation with tenure position

 

at what university do you find this lolas?

 

 

all of them!

On 3/14/2019 at 12:55 AM, scorecard said:

That all depends on the type of institution involved. And some simply don't offer tenure to foreign lecturers at all, and sometimes because their Thai professors strongly object. Been there done that!!!!!!!!!!! 

we have different experience

2 hours ago, Odysseus123 said:

I don't agree.

 

In professional qualifications the Phillipines has it all over Thailand.

 

Most Thai degrees are worth a rotten slice of durian.

 

Amyway if you fork up the money for such a scheme than they will merely come home and feed chickems..

 

Never saw a Thai with a professional degree in my home country in my life,.

 

I have seen South Koreans,Chinese,Malaysians and Indians..etc

 

But from the hub of the intellectual and cultural universe-Thailand,Myanmar,Laos and Cambodia nothing but prostitutes and bottle washers.

https://www.webometrics.info/en/Asia_Pacifico/South East Asia

2 hours ago, scorecard said:

Why is it not correct?

if you are on tenure foreigners can get longer than one year contract!!!

we are mixing part-time, adjunct position with regular one 

On 2/25/2019 at 3:24 PM, manchega said:

show me the contract, I am not interested in part time etc. show me the contract

 

full time jobs require a contract as do part time

 

no excuses 

 

facts only please

Mahidol, AIT, Chula, CMU, SUT, PSU, WU, MFU,... check by yourself.